presumably Koord, at least, or else why be on Nimbus III at all? although the colony's intent seems to have been sabotaged...Only two out of billions? Statistically unlikely.
presumably Koord, at least, or else why be on Nimbus III at all? although the colony's intent seems to have been sabotaged...Only two out of billions? Statistically unlikely.
Agreed. Of all the arguments you can make against TFF, Luckinbill is definitely not one of them. I think he gave an excellent performance. I don't think Connery would have pulled it off as well. It's just not his type of role, IMHO.I think the film would have been a lot worse, and also even more mocked, if Connery had played him (including that he would have been completely unbelievable as Spock's half-brother).
I remember watching ST 5 shortly after it came out and was .... very disappointed compared to the previous few entries. But..... time has changed that for sure. After many other Trek films (and some Star Wars) that have let me down far more (i'm looking at you Into Darkness and SW Prequels) , this film is pretty damn decent. Minus some weak special effects it was pretty well crafted. Most importantly its heart was in the right place. After my re-watch I decided to take a stab at a Fanedit of it (i've done several others previously but not Star Trek yet). If anyone would like to give it a look send me a PM i'm sure you will find it an interesting watch as it seems pretty unique to what i've seen out there.
Mine is 1hr 32 minutes so about 15 minutes. Plot is fully intact minus the thread about Kirk knowing he would die alone (which I think was a bit strange). Forgot to give kudos to Jerry Goldsmith for knocking the score out of the park and the DP for a well shot film. Otherwise I just cut moments that were not consequential to the plot that had pushed humor or over the top elements. So its tone is closer to 6 (which I love).About how many minutes did you cut out? I've seen some people talk about re-edits that were pretty drastic.
Thanks!
Fixed that for you.and fixed special effects for the Klingonsatellitespace probe target practice
Flashbacks to her upbringing would have been a great way to explore her Romulan heritage.
There were 3 writers on the film, each with different voices. In particular David Lauhery, from what I understand, was brought in at the studios behest to inject 'humor' into the script as audiences loved the gags in ST 4. I sure did too. But the only reason the humor worked in ST4 was because of the context of the characters being trapped 300 years before their births and not understanding the customs and technology at the time. It felt organic and real. And it worked thanks to from what I understand rewrites by Nick Meyer (once again saving the day for Trek). But for 5 much of the humor was forced and made fans uncomfortable. A great example of this was Scotty hitting his head on his own ship right after saying 'I know every inch of this ship'. Ugggg..... And then theres Kirk falling down El Capitan after saying 'I fully understand the gravity of the situation'. Even the Original Series was never that outright goofy. That stuff belongs in 'Three's Company' , not cerebral Sci-fi. Thats why removing items like them from the film only benefits from it as they were studio injected junk.I don't mind the humour in the movie but I do feel that Shatner's Kirk needs a director to reign him in a bit. Some of the dialogue was too heavy-handed and needed another once-over.
Well, there's this from TWOK:TSFS (the film that really brought humor back)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.