• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Could Star Trek V been saved?

FYI, in their continuing effort to make their show more like TNG, SNW retconned the Enterprise as the flagship. Yeah, it makes little sense, but there you are.

But back to TFF: Even if Starfleet thought Kirk was the most awesomest captain ever and only he could accomplish the mission, it still made no sense to send him out in the Enterprise-A when a perfectly good ship (the Excelsior) was sitting right next to the Enterprise in Spacedock.
To be fair, I think only M'Benga actually says it and the show portrayed him as having tons of issues, to put it mildly, so maybe there's wiggle room here...
 
Reportedly, Bob Justman hated recurring off-ship characters and scotched the return of Kor for later episodes because in the vastness of space, meeting the same person stretched plausibility. I'm with Bob. Khan made sense as a one-off for a movie follow up, but that's it.
He did. And Fontana hated "small galaxy syndrome", as per this 1967-06-30 Fontana-penned memo about Sturgeon's "He Walked Among Us":

bafkreiapcpswchy6mkusex4pxiaytzmnewlwc3ugswbwks3ma65kqiphzm@jpeg


Scene 31. It is a small galaxy, populated by not more than 50 people. I know this because wherever we go, Kirk and Spock always recognize everybody they meet. If, indeed, they are to recognize Theodore Bayne, we must know why. If we do it this way, we should establish at this point that Bayne, a skilled surgeon, is still quite a bit of a visionary, and something of a crackpot who is know for his wild theories or whatever you will have.
 
Can you repost this on my thread here? (I'd do it but I was the last poster on the thread over a month ago.)

 
I truly wish we had producers and writers of the calibre and common sense of Justman and Fontana these days. Good heavens knows what they’d think of not just SNW but the cringe-fest that was Picard season three.
 
Small Universe Syndrome has been a staple of Trek since the TOS movies. Khan meets Chekov again? Really?
I think it works as a one-off because that makes it a coincidence. And it helps with the audience, especially back then, to have someone who knew Khan and could fill people in. Even though the person they picked wasn't there, which moots the point.
Spock's parents.
Made sense in context of the movies. Assuming the Vulcan only has one Federation Ambassador, or a go-to, Sarek works.
Kirk's exs.
Once in a fantasy in "Shore Leave" is fine, and once as a story point works, after that, it's stretching it. He had, I think, three live ex's show up in the series and one in the movies. But if we stuck to realism, we'd never have had Bibi Besch and that would have been a genuine shame.
Spock's ex.
Made sense in context of the episode - Spock went back home to see her.
McCoy's ex.
Never saw her. Never mentioned either. In fact, if you go by only the aired live action episodes, you'd never know McCoy was ever married or had a kid. The first mention of a daughter at all was in TAS "The Survivor." Unless you mean the tie-in media but I'm assuming you're not because:

Books could be even worse.
 
I think it works as a one-off because that makes it a coincidence. And it helps with the audience, especially back then, to have someone who knew Khan and could fill people in. Even though the person they picked wasn't there, which moots the point.

Made sense in context of the movies. Assuming the Vulcan only has one Federation Ambassador, or a go-to, Sarek works.

Once in a fantasy in "Shore Leave" is fine, and once as a story point works, after that, it's stretching it. He had, I think, three live ex's show up in the series and one in the movies. But if we stuck to realism, we'd never have had Bibi Besch and that would have been a genuine shame.

Made sense in context of the episode - Spock went back home to see her.

Never saw her. Never mentioned either. In fact, if you go by only the aired live action episodes, you'd never know McCoy was ever married or had a kid. The first mention of a daughter at all was in TAS "The Survivor." Unless you mean the tie-in media but I'm assuming you're not because:
Not sure "makes sense in the context of the episode" is quite the out you think it is.

Our heroes are consistently running in to exes, relatives, mentors and others in the oddest places.
 
Well, you either get an expository conversation where we learn of a pre-existing relationship, or a montage showing a developing one over time, or a forever-love-at-first-sight-until-something-happens-to-end-it story.
 
Once in a fantasy in "Shore Leave" is fine, and once as a story point works, after that, it's stretching it. He had, I think, three live ex's show up in the series and one in the movies. But if we stuck to realism, we'd never have had Bibi Besch and that would have been a genuine shame.
Areel Shaw.

Ruth.

Carol Marcus.


Never saw her. Never mentioned either. In fact, if you go by only the aired live action episodes, you'd never know McCoy was ever married or had a kid. The first mention of a daughter at all was in TAS "The Survivor." Unless you mean the tie-in media but I'm assuming you're not because:
I guess my terminology was poor but Nancy Crater was an ex crush at least.


Made sense in context of the episode - Spock went back home to see her.
Again, my bad on poor terminology. Someone Spock knew and had a crush on him.


Made sense in context of the movies. Assuming the Vulcan only has one Federation Ambassador, or a go-to, Sarek works.
Was referring to Journey to Babel. Again, my bad for being brief and glib.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top