Could a Black Hole destroy a whole galaxy?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Lookingglassman, Aug 22, 2007.

  1. Newtype_A

    Newtype_A Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    Pretty much ANYTHING could destroy a whole galaxy, given enough time. The better question is, could a black whole destroy a whole galaxy before every star in that entire galaxy completely burned out and the universe as we know it fizzled out like a firecracker?

    No, it couldn't. Even if you found a black hole that was big enough to plausibly cause that kind of destruction (remember, galaxies are So Big, So Absolutely Huge...) the more likely result would be that most of the galaxy would end up in orbit of the black hole; wouldn't destroy it, just change shape.
     
  2. Newtype_A

    Newtype_A Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    Not really. The sun would still be a black hole even if the Borg came along and crushed it down to a mass 2.9 kilometers wide. The only thing that MAKES it a black hole in the first place is the fact that you can't see it, because it's smaller than it's own Swartzchild Radius. All that would mean is that there's a region 100 meters thick where the acceleration due to gravity is equal to or slightly greater than the speed of light.

    No reason why it would be constantly collapsing, and since physicists don't really have any idea how (or if) the laws of physics work under those conditions, there plenty of speculation but very little fact.
     
  3. Neopeius

    Neopeius Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Location:
    55 years ago
    I thought the whole point was that it takes an infinite amount of time to get from the event horizon to the center because of the relativistic differential involved. A black hole is a very specific condition, a sort of funnel-shaped piece of energy. No matter can withstand that kind of density.

    So it's meaningless to talk of diameters or shapes of a black hole. They don't really have one. All they have is an event horizon.
     
  4. Chaos Descending

    Chaos Descending Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Location:
    Grand Canyon State
    Well, when it comes right down to it, it's not exactly wrong to refer to the surface of the event horizon as the "surface" of the black hole itself.
     
  5. Neopeius

    Neopeius Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Location:
    55 years ago
    It's certainly true that the event horizon is the only meaningful boundary to a black hole.
     
  6. Hippokrene

    Hippokrene Lieutenant Junior Grade Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Could you elaborate on this? Are you saying the gravitational field of a black hole sometimes turns off?
     
  7. iguana_tonante

    iguana_tonante Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Location:
    Italy, EU
    ^Of course not. It just happens that there are moments in a black hole's life where there are not available matter to suck in, so it sucks nothing. When matter passes by, the black hole sucks it, and if the conditions are right, the super-heated matter it will emit X-ray radiation during its fall.
     
  8. splodenode

    splodenode Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    why dont the x-rays get sucked in too?
     
  9. iguana_tonante

    iguana_tonante Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Location:
    Italy, EU
    ^Because they are emitted outside of the event horizon.