Discovery is the current and future face of the franchise. Further, the showrunners have basically been given the keys to the kingdom and are in charge of TV Trek in general. Why wouldn't Star Trek fans want to discuss that direction, even if they don't like it? This is a discussion forum, after all. There's no "big fan of Discovery" requirement for admission.
I can understand why people who really like Discovery get tired of seeing it criticized, but, at the same time, I can tell you that it gets equally tiring sifting through endless posts, often mocking, that boil down to "like it or leave."
Never said discussion wasn't warranted or welcome, nor would I say that anyone needs a membership card to participate. Please don't put words in my mouth. Trying to cause trouble and vomiting negativity at people repeatedly is not discussion, though. I personally have not seen you doing that...so I'm assuming you're advocating for others positions there.
People often post as though the producers are their audience, as if their posts are a suggestion box entry. Others just do it because they want the conflict. Neither rmotivation is something that makes sense to me.
I'd have to say that if you go to a message board dedicated to fan discussion about a series or movie, regardless of your take on it, you should EXPECT to have to "sift through endless posts" that lean toward support and praise. Most people go to talk, speculate, debate the merits of something they LIKE.
On the other hand, the critical posts are often there to derail or start conflict in topics that are not dedicated to complaining or criticizing. People seem to feel compelled to counter the positivity, as if someone is keeping score somewhere and you can't possibly just sit back and allow it to continue...because damnit my voice needs to be heard!
I can be a
football fan, but if I dislike the Dallas Cowboys, I don't feel compelled to go specifically into Cowboys forums and drive their fans shithouse by needling them about how much their players underperform and suck, their management is incompetent, and their coaches are idiots. I'll stick to talking about teams I like and follow, and leave those fans to their peace.
Perhaps the point is that it's not the debate and criticism, it's the way people present those opinions. Some do it pointedly, smartly and respectfully. Others come across as the kid in the classroom just flicking the ears of the kid in front and saying antagonistic things under their breath trying to illicit a violent explosion.
I find one approach reasonable, balanced, respected. The other...not so much. That's not me "discouraging discussion or debate." If anyone feels that way, that's on them. I simply question the behavior.
We've actually gotten waaay of track. I'd like to go back to discussion of the show.