• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Classic Race All But Confirmed

I have nothing but reverence and passion for TOS. It is one of my favorite things in life.

It in no way makes my enjoyment of DSC difficult or has any adverse affect on my perceptions. If anything, DSC's dedication to the backstory and some characters from TOS causes me to love it even more, unlike the other spin-off shows that purposely attempted to distance themselves and even sort of laugh at the source material.

I love DSC for its acknowledgment and connection to TOS.
As do I. In fact, I'm thrilled at the inclusion of the Talosians! I love the fact that Pike's Enterprise is making an appearance. All good stuff as far as I'm concerned!
 

Yes, the planet Talos is no longer speculation, he said it outright.
:techman:

Something something canon something something...

I’m guessing there’s nothing in “the Cage” or “the Menagerie” that says the Enterprise couldn’t have gone to Talos before or after the events of “the cage” (is DSC set after the Cage? I can’t remember now)
 
Something something canon something something...

I’m guessing there’s nothing in “the Cage” or “the Menagerie” that says the Enterprise couldn’t have gone to Talos before or after the events of “the cage” (is DSC set after the Cage? I can’t remember now)

The Cage is set something like 'eleven years ago' in relation to TOS (but unclear as to exactly what year that part of TOS is in). Memory Alpha's best guess is 2254. Discovery starts in 2256.

I think Pike having more experience with the Talosians than just what was seen in the Cage makes sense, in light of the present day parts of the Menagerie. And as others have said, the Cage isn't exactly a solid foundation from which to build the idea that visiting the Talosians is worthy of a death sentence, either. So there is room to fill in some gaps with a good story.
 
The Cage is set something like 'eleven years ago' in relation to TOS (but unclear as to exactly what year that part of TOS is in). Memory Alpha's best guess is 2254. Discovery starts in 2256.
Ah thanks. I can never remember when DSC is supposed to be set relative to the Pike era. I know it’s before TOS but it’s a bit more murky where the Cage is concerned.

the Cage isn't exactly a solid foundation
Does the Cage even actually count as canon? Since it was never officially broadcast as a Trek episode proper (I.e. as part of the series)? I know the bits of the menagerie are canon because that was part of the actual show... but can we ignore the rest of the Cage since it wasn’t actually part of Star Trek once it was commissioned? I never liked the idea that the federation had a death penalty for anything if I’m honest.
 
Ah thanks. I can never remember when DSC is supposed to be set relative to the Pike era. I know it’s before TOS but it’s a bit more murky where the Cage is concerned.


Does the Cage even actually count as canon? Since it was never officially broadcast as a Trek episode proper (I.e. as part of the series)? I know the bits of the menagerie are canon because that was part of the actual show... but can we ignore the rest of the Cage since it wasn’t actually part of Star Trek once it was commissioned? I never liked the idea that the federation had a death penalty for anything if I’m honest.

Officially, I doubt it. Unofficially, however you want. I've never actually seen the Cage, personally. When I refer to it, I'm mainly referring to the events of that story, as I know them from the Menagerie. Somewhat clunky, but it's easier to separate the modern story and the flashback story for this sort of discussion.

I was mostly ok with the conceit of 'we have one last death penalty on the books, because doing that is so ridiculously dangerous that it simply can't be tolerated'. But nothing in the story backed that up. And then the Federation also had another separate death penalty that was also referred to as the last death penalty on the books. It's rather irritating, but I've been fine ignoring so far since it only mattered for 2 individual stories out of hundreds. The one I really hate is Burnham getting life in prison for a crime that most other starfleet hero characters would've gotten a stern talking-to for.
 
Starfleet had only one capital offense: General Order 7. Or General Order 4. I mix them up.

Federation member planets were free to use the death penalty, though. And pretty gruesome methods of execution at that. Argelius: death by slow torture, for example.

Deneb V made fraud punishable by death. Spock rattles off a list of possible final exits in “I, Mudd”.

Intriguingly, Kirk got M-5 to admit that the penalty for murder is death, suggesting that capital punishment is Federation law. Of course, the Feds aren’t exactly soft when it comes to non-lethal punishments. Twenty years in a rehabilitation colony for transporting tribbles seems a bit much.
 
Last edited:
Well, Kurtzman didn't specifically say we'd actually be physically going to Talos IV, it's appearance in the show could be an illusion, a dream/nightmare or some other way of showing it without actually going to it.
 
Well, Kurtzman didn't specifically say we'd actually be physically going to Talos IV, it's appearance in the show could be an illusion, a dream/nightmare or some other way of showing it without actually going to it.

"Are you going to visit any planets this season?
Alex Kurtzman: You will see a few planets this season, yes.

Are you visiting planets we’ve seen before?
Alex Kurtzman: Talos. We’re going to Talos."

Not sure how one can interpret that in any other way???
:shrug:
 
Starfleet had only one capital offense: General Order 7. Or General Order 4. I mix them up.

Federation member planets were free to use the death penalty, though. And pretty gruesome methods of execution at that. Argelius: death by slow torture, for example.

Deneb V made punishable by death. Spock rattles off a list in “I, Mudd”.

Intriguingly, Kirk got M-5 to admit that the penalty for murder is death, suggesting that capital punishment is Federation law. Of course, the Feds aren’t exactly soft when it comes to non-lethal punishments. Twenty years in a rehabilitation colony for transporting tribbles seems a bit much.

Perish the thought!! What about UTOPIA?!?!!!!11??

;)
 
"Are you going to visit any planets this season?
Alex Kurtzman: You will see a few planets this season, yes.

Are you visiting planets we’ve seen before?
Alex Kurtzman: Talos. We’re going to Talos."

Not sure how one can interpret that in any other way???
:shrug:

'We' is obviously the production/show. He's saying the production is doing Talos, ie, we (the audience) will see Talos. That doesn't automatically mean the ship is going to Talos, or any of the characters will set foot on it in the current 'modern day' of the show.

But I think it would make more sense for them to go there than to only use the planet in flashbacks or illusions.
 
I think in this case it can be pretty much assumed that the "We" he's talking about, is the crew of the Discovery that will be going to Talos the Planet.

That was the gist of TrekMovie.com's questions anyway.
 
'We' is obviously the production/show. He's saying the production is doing Talos, ie, we (the audience) will see Talos. That doesn't automatically mean the ship is going to Talos, or any of the characters will set foot on it in the current 'modern day' of the show.

But I think it would make more sense for them to go there than to only use the planet in flashbacks or illusions.

I think in this case it can be pretty much assumed that the "We" he's talking about, is the crew of the Discovery that will be going to Talos the Planet.

That was the gist of TrekMovie.com's questions anyway.

I honestly think you can interpret it either way.

I'm looking forward to seeing how it is woven in.

And...if they don't show the half-destroyed entry to the Talosian Community, I will riot like it's Festival.
 
I think in this case it can be pretty much assumed that the "We" he's talking about, is the crew of the Discovery that will be going to Talos the Planet.

That was the gist of TrekMovie.com's questions anyway.

It's the questions themselves that lead to my interpretation. Any 'you' (or 'we') that includes Kurtzman has to be referring to the production as a whole, not the Disco crew. I agree its likely they'll just go to the planet, but there's no reason for anyone to act like his comment is ironclad confirmation of that because it isn't.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top