McGann himself is fantastic but apart from his performance the TV movie is mediocre at best.Is the Paul McGann/8th Doctor movie worth checking out?
I'd have to disagree with you there, the TV movie was great.
McGann himself is fantastic but apart from his performance the TV movie is mediocre at best.Is the Paul McGann/8th Doctor movie worth checking out?
You said as much yeah. Actually I was disagreeing with you. So, what makes it great? Is it a good introduction to Doctor Who? Is it original or thought-provoking? Is it funny? Are there any standout performances from any of the supporting actors? Is it expertly plotted? Is the story memorable?McGann himself is fantastic but apart from his performance the TV movie is mediocre at best.Is the Paul McGann/8th Doctor movie worth checking out?
I'd have to disagree with you there, the TV movie was great.
Well it is memorable for being both the Seventh's last chronological appearence, and the Eighth's first. And the Master's last appearence until some 11 years later.You said as much yeah. Actually I was disagreeing with you. So, what makes it great? Is it a good introduction to Doctor Who? Is it original or thought-provoking? Is it funny? Are there any standout performances from any of the supporting actors? Is it expertly plotted? Is the story memorable?McGann himself is fantastic but apart from his performance the TV movie is mediocre at best.
I'd have to disagree with you there, the TV movie was great.
Well it is memorable for being both the Seventh's last chronological appearence, and the Eighth's first. And the Master's last appearence until some 11 years later.
Well it is memorable for being both the Seventh's last chronological appearence, and the Eighth's first. And the Master's last appearence until some 11 years later.You said as much yeah. Actually I was disagreeing with you. So, what makes it great? Is it a good introduction to Doctor Who? Is it original or thought-provoking? Is it funny? Are there any standout performances from any of the supporting actors? Is it expertly plotted? Is the story memorable?I'd have to disagree with you there, the TV movie was great.
Since never. The TV Movie is the only place where he ever makes that claim, and never again."Uhhm, the Doctor is half human? Since when?
It does, because by now even casual fans know the regeneration scene from it.Well it is memorable for being both the Seventh's last chronological appearence, and the Eighth's first. And the Master's last appearence until some 11 years later.You said as much yeah. Actually I was disagreeing with you. So, what makes it great? Is it a good introduction to Doctor Who? Is it original or thought-provoking? Is it funny? Are there any standout performances from any of the supporting actors? Is it expertly plotted? Is the story memorable?
It's notable for those things. That doesn't necessarily make it memorable.
It does, because by now even casual fans know the regeneration scene from it.Well it is memorable for being both the Seventh's last chronological appearence, and the Eighth's first. And the Master's last appearence until some 11 years later.
It's notable for those things. That doesn't necessarily make it memorable.
Yep.It does, because by now even casual fans know the regeneration scene from it.It's notable for those things. That doesn't necessarily make it memorable.
From frequent out-of-context repetition of that clip, yes. The rest of it, not so much.
I know that they're non-canon, but what's the deal with the Peter Cushing movies? My local library has them.
I know that they're non-canon, but what's the deal with the Peter Cushing movies? My local library has them.
The Doctor is a human scientist, not a Time Lord and Susan is a lot younger.
Other than that they are not too different, well worth a watch.
The first one is a remake of Dalek Invasion of Earth and has Bernard Cribbens in it.
I quite like them as enjoyable oddities.
I know that they're non-canon, but what's the deal with the Peter Cushing movies? My local library has them.
The Doctor is a human scientist, not a Time Lord and Susan is a lot younger.
Other than that they are not too different, well worth a watch.
The first one is a remake of Dalek Invasion of Earth and has Bernard Cribbens in it.
I quite like them as enjoyable oddities.
That's the second one. Basically, they're remakes of the first two TV Dalek serials. The Daleks were really the break-out stars that initially made the TV series a success, and were arguably iconic before the Doctor himself became so; the early '60s was the time of "Dalek-mania" in Britain. To cash in on their popularity, Amicus films adapted 'The Daleks' and 'The Dalek Invasion of Earth' as cinematic movies, with a few tweaks to make them work a bit better as standalone stories unconnected to a larger narrative - this was before the mythology we now take for granted had been established in the show; the Doctor was still an enigma whose origins were unknown, so the films' writers had greater freedom to disregard that element of the show. Doctor Who (for that is his name) is a human scientist who invents "Tardis" (proper name, no definite article), and whisks his two granddaughters, Susan (younger than the TV version) and Barbara, and Barbara's boyfriend Ian, off to Skaro.
The TV cast were not involved because they were busy making the series.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.