• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Chronicle - worst movie of the year award

If you didn't even watch the whole film, indeed not even half of it, then your whole argument (no matter what film it was) is rendered null and void.



For the record I saw it, enjoyed it enough for what it was. The characters were a bit annoying but it certainly wasn't a terrible movie. If you do think that you can't have seen that many (bad) movies to know what one really is
 
Christopher, I think this is thread that I've found myself agreeing with you the most.

We aren't seeing "I fell into an experiment and went bad, OMG!" like we see in comic books and the like. This film had more credibility than any other "superhero" film that I've ever seen.
 
Out of curiosity DarthTom, what would you say is your favorite movie to date?
This is after your overt declaration that you thought Twilight was OK, which has left me wondering if you were under the influence of narcotics while watching it.

-Jamman
 
This thread is terrible and completely unlike what I expected. I stopped reading the posts before I reached #17.
 
I didn't have any real interest in this movie. I am burnt out on "Found Footage" movies, and if we never get any more, it will be too soon.
 
I walked out after only seeing the first 25 minutes of Star Trek 2009...

... Then I went to the bathroom and walked back in. Damn you movie megaplexes and your super ultimate big gulp bladder blaster soft drink upgrades for just fifty cents more!
 
I have no desire to see this movie...but was intrigued that it's director is apparently the director of "Chronicle" is in talks to helm Fox's "Fantastic Four" reboot.
 
I didn't have any real interest in this movie. I am burnt out on "Found Footage" movies, and if we never get any more, it will be too soon.

It's not like other "found footage" movies (at least, I gather it isn't; it's the first one of that genre I've ever actually seen, as far as I can recall). For one thing, the director had the sense to recognize that people who are into working with cameras would actually know how to use them and would thus be able to point them steadily at things rather than shaking them around like they were going through the DTs in the middle of an earthquake. So it doesn't have the same kind of self-conscious ineptness as the camera work in a lot of other "found footage" films. More importantly, Andrew's obsession with recording everything in his life actually serves a key purpose in exploring his psychology, the way this abused and lonely child uses cameras as a barrier from the world and comes to think of them as his only true friends, becoming increasingly cut off from humanity. So it's not just a stylistic gimmick but a meaningful mechanism for character exploration. (Although, granted, there are a couple of key scenes toward the end where it's implausible that there would actually be a working camera in position to document a certain image, and a lot of the early footage is from a camera that apparently ended up destroyed so it's unlikely anyone could've recovered its footage.) And perhaps it's something of a commentary on the YouTube generation, on young people who get caught up in documenting everything even at the cost of things like privacy and intimacy, and on the way we've become so used to having cameras everywhere that their presence no longer inhibits us from misbehaving.

I mean, seriously, if Peter Parker were a teen in today's world when he got bitten by a radioactive spider, he probably would record all his superpowered feats on video much like this. The Spidey of the '60s became famous appearing in wrestling matches and TV variety shows, but today he'd probably become famous through viral videos instead. I'd kind of like to see the upcoming Amazing Spider-Man movie go that route, except that it would be criticized as a copy of this movie if it did.
 
I'll give this thread credit - I'm now actually interested in this movie, whereas before I had none whatsoever.
 
I'd kind of like to see the upcoming Amazing Spider-Man movie go that route, except that it would be criticized as a copy of this movie if it did.

I think people would be more inclined to call it a ripoff of Kick Ass rather than Chronicle.
 
I'll give this thread credit - I'm now actually interested in this movie, whereas before I had none whatsoever.

Same here. I wasn't even aware of it before this thread. Then I started scheduling a movie date with a friend and she said she was interested in seeing this, so I figured what the hell! We'll see if it's good. :)
 
I did a survey asking for my opinion on the trailer sometime last year. It didn't have the finished effects in place and I had to sign an NDA, but it sparked my interest from that point forward.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top