• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Changing opinions

I haven't read it since the 90s but I think I would still like The Return just for all the ideas they put forward, like the slow assimilation procedure, the weird transwarp platform, the Defiant-class Enterprise, Borg dogs, I think Picard and Crusher are commandos at one point, the visit to the V'Ger planet. That was the first one I read of that series so I didn't mind all the contrivances and reusing story elements there compared to later on.
The only reason I bought the novelisation of Broken Bow recently was because Diane Carey had gone off on her own and smartassed the script.
 
Interesting - I knew that happened in Broken Bow, but I didn't know it had slipped into earlier ones too.

The first time I noticed it was the novelization of "Endgame," where after future!Barclay introduced Janeway as "The woman who literally wrote the book on the Borg," Janeway thought, "I never wrote a book, doesn't the man know what 'literally' means?" which confused me because, well, when I saw the episode, nothing seemed unreasonable about Janeway having written a book about the Borg.

It's been a long time since I read it, but one Carey-ism I remember from "Equinox" is describing Voyager's dedication plaque having Janeway's name on it as first Captain, which is probably a detail from her sailing days, since that's not something that appeared on any Trek plaques.

(Well, except the NX-01. "Hadn't appeared to date," at least.)
 
Last edited:
Kind of a one-two punch of opinions that have changed over time... First, my reading of the novels has finally pushed into the post-Nemesis era, so I've had the last four (hardcopy) New Frontier novels in my to-read stack, and... I said this over in the thread on rereading New Frontier, the magic was just GONE the moment that I started reading After the Fall, and it really only got worse as I continued on, to the point that I actively stopped reading Blind Man's Bluff and put it aside, because I just... I didn't CARE about what was happening at that point. It was just unpleasant to read.

But, because of their closeness in the timeline, that also brought me to Before Dishonor in roughly the same timespan. And... Well, I'd always been of the opinion that it was some of the worst elements of Peter David's excess of comic book sensibilities with none of the restrain of prior endeavors, that maybe he'd been writing New Frontier for too long and couldn't switch gears.

But what came to my mind as a "reconsidering things" aspect is that... While I think that having the mutiny happen damaged the characters involved too severely to continue having them on the crew, the characters THEMSELVES were not irredeemable, not even in this situation. The problem is that the whole book kicks off with us knowing that the reason that Picard and company are willing to act on Seven's word about the Borg. So instead of being characters who are acting out of genuine concern for the mental health of their superior officer, believing him to be acting irrationally on the basis of a traumatic experience he has not fully recovered from, they're just... obstacles in the narrative.

Granted, I'm not so sure that the mutiny plot could have EVER worked this early in the game, but the way that they get framed in this book just frames them as not just fools who are willing to let the Borg steamroll everything, but even acting in opposition to the events of Star Trek First Contact, and one of its earliest moments of audience catharsis, when Data says "I believe I speak for everyone when I say to hell with our orders." Now, here we are, and whatever reasonable arguments that could be made about obeying Starfleet Command panicking (which, additional side note, I'm not even a big fan of Jellico, and I think that he's being over-the-top antagonistic towards Picard in this book as well, which also doesn't help...), they don't get made.

Like... Having read Q&A first, I was honestly finding myself wishing that there was even one novel that slotted between the two, allow a better idea of who these characters ARE, because Q&A, while introducing the characters, was understandably more centered on the perspective of the Picard-Q plotline than being the firm establishing character piece for these new characters.

Honestly, the more I roll it over in my head, the more I genuinely regret that we DON'T have more of these three, because I just feel like Before Dishonor is character assassination of characters barely established - in treating them like villains in this book, it makes me want them all to have a better appearance elsewhere so that they could have been narratively redeemed, even knowing that the "reward" for that is that they'd still have to dovetail back into THIS mess.

So yeah, my view has changed to sympathy for the newbies for being stuck in an instance of poor writing.
 
Well, I did write Q & A believing that Kadohata and Leybenzon would be recurring characters for a long time. Sigh.

In Titan: Orion's Hounds, I set up the Gum Nebula (a real-life region bigger than the Federation and its neighbors combined) as a region large and diverse and rich enough that the Titan could spend years and years exploring it... and then the very next novel said the Titan had left it behind.
 
Don't you guys have like, handover notes for the next author?

We can suggest things that we hope our successors will pick up on, but other authors' books are theirs to write as they see fit. If Marco Palmieri (Titan's editor) had wanted to pick up on the idea of the Gum Nebula as a recurring setting as I hoped, he would have advised subsequent authors accordingly. But he seemed content to let the Titan authors strike our own paths.
 
I was a lot less impressed in long after rereading Balance of Power (used to like seeing Wesley again, now not really liking seeing that he's pretty disillusioned) and Q-Squared (initially helped by the novelty of seeing the alternate universe with Jack Crusher alive and Will & Deanna together and Jean-Luc and Beverly getting together, now hurt by finding Trelane pretty blah and the tone being overly dismissive) and Mosaic (the novelty of seeing Janeway not quite so idealized and invulnerable as in the show, now she seems still too overly idealized even in youth).
 
Don't you guys have like, handover notes for the next author?

Not as often as you might think (or as often as authors might like). Generally, it’s the editor’s job to make sure the next author picks up the threads of a book in a series, but the actual enforcement of that varies depending on a lot of factors - the editorial team’s involvement, the subject material, the publisher, the whims of the license-holder, etc.

I’ve worked in on-going fiction streams with a quite few intellectual properties, not just Star Trek, and I’ve had different degrees of collaboration with the previous/next writer. For example, stuff like Star Trek: The Fall and Star Trek: Coda had a tight focus over their mini-series arc, so in those cases I worked closely with my colleagues to maintain the flow of the story. We traded lots of emails, calls and work-in-progress. On something like the Warhammer Horus Heresy saga, we had bi-annual in-person meetings and ongoing email chains discussing the scope of the main story arc, but when it came down to the actual writing of individual books, we pretty much did our own thing; conversely, in the ‘main’ Warhammer 40,000 continuity there was little or no obligation to reference the works of other authors, as long as you adhered to the core lore of the IP. On the Doctor Who stuff I did, writers were expected to acknowledge the broad strokes of previous stories, but not tied down to making everything marry up perfectly. When I worked on IPs like Halo, Stargate, Tannhauser or Dark Future, I had more or less a free hand.

Often the accepted guidance seems to be: as long as the work is in line with the source IP and doesn’t massively contradict the content of other tie-ins, go ahead.

It’s not all happy collaboration, though... I’ve had some unwelcome experiences working in ongoing series – like assuming I was free to take a character in a certain direction and accidentally torpedoing another writer’s next book pitch; having characters I’d created and invested in get killed off without any warning; other authors in a series who assumed they had the authority to red-pen and edit my work before it was published; and editors/publishers/licensors who either didn’t care at all about continuity, or who enforced it with such draconian measures that it was nigh-impossible to do anything interesting...

Personally, I always try to make myself available to discuss story content if someone following or preceding me wants to have that conversation, and I reciprocate if I feel there’s a need – like asking “Hey, do you have any plans for that planet? Mind if I blow it up?
 
Peter David wasn’t provided with a copy of the manuscript for Q&A while writing Before Dishonor (though he did have the manuscript for Resistance). It baffled me that three of the four novels in the first wave of the TNG relaunch were commissioned from writers who predated the modern continuity, and that the editor didn’t seem to do much to create harmony among their works. Q&A was the only one of the four that felt like it was actually trying to kick off a relaunch and start to establish new characters worth getting invested in.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top