• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's only for proper names; for example, Scrabble, or Gowron. But human and klingon and andorian and vulcan, etc. are names of species or races, too, and wouldn't necessarily be capitalized.

x43x36.jpg


How many infringements can you count here?

While I know stealing someone's IP is theft, I never learned to count.

And besides, that work might be transformative. But get sued to find out!
 
I have some pretty long Star Trek Photostrips, many of which are just jokes, but the longest could be construed as a more serious attempt at an hour long Star Trek episode (how long it might be if one actually filmed it, I can't be sure, but it's a story in 8 parts, each part having 25 or so panels, IIRC). I'm not sure if CBS/Paramount would complain, but I doubt that one would come under "fair use."

Anyway, I doubt I should put it up here since it is . . . long and . . . off topic, probably.
 
I have some pretty long Star Trek Photostrips, many of which are just jokes, but the longest could be construed as a more serious attempt at an hour long Star Trek episode (how long it might be if one actually filmed it, I can't be sure, but it's a story in 8 parts, each part having 25 or so panels, IIRC). I'm not sure if CBS/Paramount would complain, but I doubt that one would come under "fair use."

Anyway, I doubt I should put it up here since it is . . . long and . . . off topic, probably.
Oh go ahead. My scroll wheel works just fine.
 
You do realize in my example of women's suffrage and copyright, you are the straight white male who doesn't think women should be allowed the vote because it's not "natural"?

*hands shovel back*
Not as white as you profiled me to be (based on my real name), and my sexual orientation is none of your business. But seeing as your avatar and pseudonym depict Professor Zoom (a.k.a Eobard Thawn), a straight white male and a man who's murdered several women, I think your metaphor is a bit selective. Here's that shovel back.
 
Not as white as you profiled me to be (based on my real name), and my sexual orientation is none of your business. But seeing as your avatar and pseudonym depict Professor Zoom (a.k.a Eobard Thawn), a straight white male and a man who's murdered several women, I think your metaphor is a bit selective. Here's that shovel back.

It's true, I know nothing about you in real life. I'm only comparing your postition to those of 100 years ago and this idea of what is natural and not natural---something that you brought up if you recall. Remember I called it a silly line of argument, but you kept insisting somethings are natural and encoding in our genetics and somethings aren't.

It's not a metaphor: it's a comparison.

Edited to others: true enough. Off to enjoy the day.

And I'm sorry: my intention isn't to say you are those old white men, but rather to point out how silly the natural law argument is.
 
Last edited:
It's true, I know nothing about you in real life. I'm only comparing your postition to those of 100 years ago[...]
That's your comparison, not mine. Furthermore, it is questionable whether someone like me would have existed 100 years ago, given the fact that may parents are of different ethnicities and religious denominations. (Not that it matters, because this is all basically a tangent.)
[...]and this idea of what is natural and not natural---something that you brought up if you recall. Remember I called it a silly line of argument, but you kept insisting somethings are natural and encoding in our genetics and somethings aren't.
I did not continue to insist that it was genetic. That was a one time comment that you continue to harp on. My general argument was that the concept of physical was more naturally intuitive than copyright infringement. Given the complex nature of copyright law and the fact that infringement is very time and context sensitive, I fail to see how you can dispute that.
 
Oh go ahead. My scroll wheel works just fine.
The message board I originally made them for had spoiler tags so the images wouldn't be uncovered or need to be dowloaded unless a viewer wanted to see the "spoilers." When just one part is like 25 images, it can be annoying to some their browsers drag or get hung up and is sometimes unresponsive until all those images are downloaded and displayed, particularly if they aren't interested in the photo strip. They might not even be able to scroll past it until it's fully downloaded.

And it's off topic. Any suggestions or hints how to make a new thread for Star Trek Photostrips on this BBS, or is there already a thread for that sort of thing? I don't really intuitively grasp the tools here. Is there a link one might offer me that explains the procedure here for that sort of thing?

Thanks.

Ah, another single image one.
f57i11.jpg

Musical Reminder: ~1:03 in.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
This board also has spoiler tags.

To open a new thread, click the Home button at the top-left to bring up all the categories. Next, click on the desired category, in this case Fan Art is probably the best fit for your images. Scroll to the bottom and click on the New Topic button at the bottom-right. Ta-da.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top