• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps... but considering the fact that Alec tends to have a hard time keeping straight what he is and what he controls, he could have been blowing smoke up the ol' tailpipe.
Sure, but the balance of probability would weigh in favour of him being involved right up to the hinge.
 
It is my opinion that Alec has been squirreling money away in his various entities since August of 2015, when he - again in my opinion - was told by CBS that he better stop or else.

As he needs the physical space to store his props - although Propworx is rumored to be in trouble as well - and he desperately wants to cling to the notion that he is a big-time producer, he has to preserve the studio.

To do that he needs funds that can't be touched, and he has been actively shuffling them into hidey holes for some time.
 
Sure, but the balance of probability would weigh in favour of him being involved right up to the hinge.

He's done it before. (For those who don't want to click a link: Peters claimed that props from the BSG auction would be shipped by Collectible Shipping Service, a company that he presented as being third party. One of the prop buyers did some digging and it turned out that CSS was owned by Peters and run by a business associate of his. He 'fessed up after the information came to light.)
 
It is my opinion that Alec has been squirreling money away in his various entities since August of 2015, when he - again in my opinion - was told by CBS that he better stop or else.

As he needs the physical space to store his props - although Propworx is rumored to be in trouble as well - and he desperately wants to cling to the notion that he is a big-time producer, he has to preserve the studio.

To do that he needs funds that can't be touched, and he has been actively shuffling them into hidey holes for some time.

It will be interesting to see how long they can keep their escrow balance a state secret.

Mr. Bawden said they have an accountant sorting things out... which results will get picked over by outsiders if/when published. Behind that will be anything the IRS might wish to audit. Discovery reviewing books to see where funds/benefits might have accrued to individuals. Potentially, state review of whether labor laws were followed. And maybe even a consumer protection probe.

And publishing all them, AxaMonitor.

Not the most ideal hidey hole :rofl:
 
Last edited:
Gabriel Charles Koerner of Trekkies fame has a fun thread up on his Facebook page. Lots of interesting discussion of various issues surrounding the production of Axanar, and some pictures of the partially completed sets. Alec had made a bunch of comments, but deleted them yesterday - typical behavior for him.
Link?
 
Thanks. Not seeing the set photos. Were those in Alec's now-deleted replies?

EDIT: Wait,now I see them.
 

Well I read the thread and see that Dean Newbury, the fellow who was a production manager and who is being so reasonable, is selling the line "nothing was wrong about building a studio because it was all spelled out in the kickstarter and fans knew they were giving their money to it". But he tries to present it as having the intention of being a west coast Trek fanfilm site, not a business.

To me, any person like him thinking of getting involved with the project, and reading that pitch on KS, would have to say "hey, wait, WTF, make non-Trek productions with a permanent studio facility built off the fundraising, isn't that money diverted from the fan film and isn't that trading on studio IP for profit?".

Instead he argues "what do you expect should be done with resources after the film is done? How would it be responsible to not use them?"

Hey, lets rob the bank. Then build a store with the proceeds. Why can't we make a profit off that? Once the store is built, what do you expect a person to do with it?

DON'T TAKE WHAT YOU CAN PLAINLY SEE IS STOLEN MONEY. DON'T BUILD THEIR STORE FOR THEM. DON'T SAY YOU HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE MONEY AND HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY TO JUDGE ITS ORIGINS. That's what.

The same goes for all the Axanar staff. Once the Kickstarter made it clear that a permanent business doing non-Trek for-profit productions was to be built (a fact Axanar staff constantly cite) by trading on Trek IP value in this project (a fact they omit), there was no way any Axanar participant could plead total innocence. Trapped, even blindsided, yes. But then staying on and claiming they were only part of the "clean" parts making the fan film, no. Staying on meant supporting all the objectives, as plainly stated in the KS.

Its a very small project with a clear statement of objectives seeking public money, including a goal clearly not ethical in the context. Responsibility for the whole cycle attaches individually to everyone who stayed after the change was made to tack on the for-profit future. Building sets directly advanced the for profit studio. Not a paper's width between them.
 
Last edited:
Profile http://www.winston.com/en/who-we-are/attorneys/hughes-diana-l.html shows her to be a specialist in fair use and contention thereby in new media areas. They may be strengthening their bench either in hopes of forcing a better settlement or making sweeping discovery inquiries within which they could go fishing for things they can dispute. In for a penny...
.......................
I'm sure this continued W&S agenda must be heartening to Axanar. OTOH, W&S must hope the circus builds so they can get max PR out of any scrap of IP law they can dispute.
......................
I don't see either of those parties aligning their behavior with the interests of fans other than Axalites, though. Everyone else is collateral.
Indeed. Though I still maintain the opinion that the supporter fans are also of no interest to W&S outside of usefulness as it would directly pertain to their Case, their Client, and the Firm/Attorneys agenda of the chance to effect IP law, which the defendant mentions on the production website.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Just saw this. Bollocks about haters
:wtf:

Okay, how is Mike Bawden a spokesperson for Axanar? He doesn't know anything. That whole discussion he was like "I don't know, I'll ask Alec," "I don't know, Alec hasn't gotten back to me yet," "I don't know, Alec doesn't tell me anything," "I told Alec he needs to do that, but he didn't."

Seriously, this guy needs to quit on principle or learn to lie effectively, especially if LOOOORDFIM is going to keep having hissy-fits and throwing him to the wolves that way.
 
:wtf:

Okay, how is Mike Bawden a spokesperson for Axanar? He doesn't know anything. That whole discussion he was like "I don't know, I'll ask Alec," "I don't know, Alec hasn't gotten back to me yet," "I don't know, Alec doesn't tell me anything," "I told Alec he needs to do that, but he didn't."

Seriously, this guy needs to quit on principle or learn to lie effectively, especially if LOOOORDFIM is going to keep having hissy-fits and throwing him to the wolves that way.

He's not a spokesperson, he's a PR rep. He just flummoxed an edition of a show that has effectively skewered his client in the past.

That's how.
 
In the FB discussion thread cited just above, an Axalite claimed the coffee was donated-end-of-story to Axanar for sale in the donor store (implying it wasn't a formal business arrangement with Axanar). Any truth to this?
 
Well, if it gets out he has copies of actual Axanar principal e-mails. Loeb & Loeb could subpoena him for a deposition, and get a court order for him to turn over what he has. If that happens Terry won't be the one who picks and chooses what gets used from the e-mail archives he has. Again, I understood that (again assuming the Facebook post was genuine) he was meeting with his own attorney - but again, although not named as a defendant - he is a person who was a part of Axanar and he could be deposed by Loeb & Loeb directly regarding what he knows and any evidence he has.
Certainly anything he has is discoverable and I suspect that a conversation with the folks from Loeb has happened or soon will. But that only goes toward the causes of action in the lawsuit not toward any criminal activity.
 
In the FB discussion thread cited just above, an Axalite claimed the coffee was donated-end-of-story to Axanar for sale in the donor store (implying it wasn't a formal business arrangement with Axanar). Any truth to this?
Not actually true. The coffee was offered for sale to the general public through a website published by Hansa Coffee. The story behind the coffee, mostly in the Hansa guy's own words, is on AxaMonitor here.
 
:wtf:

Okay, how is Mike Bawden a spokesperson for Axanar? He doesn't know anything. That whole discussion he was like "I don't know, I'll ask Alec," "I don't know, Alec hasn't gotten back to me yet," "I don't know, Alec doesn't tell me anything," "I told Alec he needs to do that, but he didn't."

Seriously, this guy needs to quit on principle or learn to lie effectively, especially if LOOOORDFIM is going to keep having hissy-fits and throwing him to the wolves that way.

Mike Bawden is the worst PR representative I've encountered. And in my time as journalist, I've encountered plenty.
 
Ok, so here's a little observation. Alec offered Terry stock in Industry Studios. He didn't say "I can speak to them and see if I can offer you..." or "we discussed it and they are willing to offer you..." . Ergo, Alec is one of the principals of Industry Studios.
He did. You're right. I totally missed that.
head-slap.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top