Yep - that's True Trek all the way.Also, thousands of people die in ST ID, but "magic blood" is only used(or only works) on Kirk for some reason... it was a very cheap and poorly thought out cop-out.

Yep - that's True Trek all the way.Also, thousands of people die in ST ID, but "magic blood" is only used(or only works) on Kirk for some reason... it was a very cheap and poorly thought out cop-out.
As long as there is money in the account, Peters will fight....To paraphrase Dr. Pulaski on the subject of odds, "If you mean mathematically... Yes, the probability is not zero."
Honestly, I don't know why Axanar/Peters would want to proceed to discovery. Nothing that will come out is likely to help them. And the longer this drags out, the more time and money will be eaten up by the litigation process. Even if the judge turns down the studios' request for a preliminary injunction, I don't see how Axanar will be able to proceed with production on a feature while the lawsuit remains pending. Their fundraising has already been halted, and the longer this goes on, the more donors and staff will desert the project.
The most likely scenario, as I see it, is Axanar/Peters will file a motion to dismiss on fair use grounds. That motion gets denied. The studios get a preliminary injunction. Peters turns around and tells his donors, "Hey, I tried, but I can't justify continuing to spend YOUR money on a cause where I can't guarantee success." He surrenders and hopes he's done enough to dissuade any of the donors from suing him.
To answer one of your other questions, if I were one of the Does, I would certainly get my own lawyer.
If you wanted an "ethnically appropriate" actor to play Khan, Naveen Andrews would have worked perfectly. But the casting of BP seems, in retrospect, a rather stupid bit of misdirection.
Also, thousands of people die in ST ID, but "magic blood" is only used(or only works) on Kirk for some reason... it was a very cheap and poorly thought out cop-out.
I've said it before (probably in this thread or one of the JJ bashing threads) - if the crew of the Enterprise actually remembered week to week the miracle cures or advancements in technology they discovered then there would be zero drama.Not seeing the problem with "Magic Blood"
1) Blood base therapies are a real thing.
2) Khan's miraculous recuperative abilities are established in "Space Seed".
3) The "Magic Blood" is established in Act One.
4) It's reiterated in Act Four.
5) Miracle cures are common place in Star Trek and rarely laid out as well.
Peters is playing like the Washington Generals.
And a little girl. And a tribble. And as far as we know a thousand people who we didn't see because they aren't the main character in a film.Also, thousands of people die in ST ID, but "magic blood" is only used(or only works) on Kirk for some reason... it was a very cheap and poorly thought out cop-out.
Oh I'm sorry I wanted the Axanar lawsuit thread but I seem to have wandered into "let's rehash the same arguments about the last film" thread.
I don't know why you keep flogging this lame stuff so much?I've said it before (probably in this thread or one of the JJ bashing threads) - if the crew of the Enterprise actually remembered week to week the miracle cures or advancements in technology they discovered then there would be zero drama.
Aging? Cured it!
Warp 10 Limit? Passed it!
Turning into a salamander because you traveled faster than Warp 10? Cured that too!
De-evolving into a lizard? Cured it with babies!
Accidental first contact and need to remove the memories of said accidental first contact? Sure! We can do that!
Making life from nothing? We're Gods! We can do anything!
Why, the very meaning of life is something that can be run around like the Prime Directive - which was the infallible foundation of Starfleet except in the dozen-or-so times it was ignored or actively disobeyed in order to advance the plot.
I think he's due!
I don't know why you keep flogging this lame stuff so much?
FTFY. Although, I don't know why you expect refinement. You have absolutely zero reason to expect such a thing as it's never happened throughout the history of the franchise. TOS did it. TNG did it. DS9 did it. VOY did it. ENT did it. Nemesis was not at all more refined than TWOK and some would argue that TMP was the most "refined" movie of them all - not good mind you - just more refined.As time progresses, I expect progress, we expect refinement.
Translation: I liked the ideas when they were on TV, or in a movie 30 years ago...but not now, because reasons.The same lacklustre stuff that was done on a shoestring yesteryear should no longer be acceptable.
Translation: That's not Star Trek, except in the countless examples where it was Star Trek.Although it isn't the same.
Translation: I like arbitrarily redefining what something is and complaining when it doesn't fit by new definition.Yesteryear, they often did their best to a tough episodic timeframe.
Translation: This is the part where I shit on the "fans" who like nuTrek. MyTrek is better. I'm smarter and look down on you people.Here JJ & his coterie had a budget and the authority but they just produced a lazily written film, crammed it with FX that appealed to the lowest common denominator.
As time progresses, we expect progress, we expect refinement.
...I seem to have wandered into "let's rehash the same arguments about the last film" thread.
Oh I'm sorry I wanted the Axanar lawsuit thread but I seem to have wandered into "let's rehash the same arguments about the last film" thread.
Translation: I don't like what the home truths that the bad guy posted so let's erect some strawmen and "win the debate" against them.When people stop brining it up, I'll stop debating it.
FTFY. Although, I don't know why you expect refinement. You have absolutely zero reason to expect such a thing as it's never happened throughout the history of the franchise. TOS did it. TNG did it. DS9 did it. VOY did it. ENT did it. Nemesis was not at all more refined than TWOK and some would argue that TMP was the most "refined" movie of them all - not good mind you - just more refined.
Translation: I liked the ideas when they were on TV, or in a movie 30 years ago...but not now, because reasons.
Translation: That's not Star Trek, except in the countless examples where it was Star Trek.
Translation: I like arbitrarily redefining what something is and complaining when it doesn't fit by new definition.
Translation: This is the part where I shit on the "fans" who like nuTrek. MyTrek is better. I'm smarter and look down on you people.
Translation: I don't like what the home truths that the bad guy posted so let's erect some strawmen and "win the debate" against them.
I've always affirmed this was Star Trek. I've never once waivered in that view. Slating the film isn't slating the fans? Do you understand that?
I expect progress because I believe in progress. As time progresses, things improve , they don't stay the same. Nothing "arbitrary" (lol) about that. It's a modest expectation.
The guy had the resources in creative terms to do better. Instead he gave us lazy drivel like magic blood, cadet to captaining of the flag ship in a week, Scott-ja ja jinks pulled around in a transparent tube, Yosemite Marcus, Iceman Kahn and his family of 'tubes, all swamped with torturous migraine inducing FX. A mess. .
What's the difference?
Neil
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.