• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Happening right now on Twitter: RMB's lawyer friend keeps telling him: Shut. Up. For. Your. Own. Good. And he just won't.
fetch.php

Team Axanar are enjoying their 15 minutes immensely, which does explain the psychology that brought them to this point.

Bunch of folks from CBS have started following @AxaMonitor on Twitter.

Interesting.

The one thing I noticed when I read the legaleese in the Lucasfilm entry form is that they never really license anything to you. You are licensing everything to them.

Yes, CBS won't be licensing fanfilms.
 
The one thing I noticed when I read the legaleese in the Lucasfilm entry form is that they never really license anything to you. You are licensing everything to them. You can create a film to enter the contest, but in entering the contest, you assign all rights to Lucasfilm. And once the contest is over, you don't even have a license to make a film that you have to license to CBS in order to make.

Using Lucasfilm as a model, the kind of thing fan-film supporters are looking to do isn't possible. I can't see any studio licensing "more" than the brief wisp of use that Disney does.
Bingo. Many people have tried to hold up Lucasfilm as a model - but folks who participate in those contests are giving up the rights to their production for the "honor" of being included on a commercial product that the they make NOTHING off of - its the equivalent of doing a job for the "exposure."
 
How Axanar Needs to End

By Lukas Kendall

I feel compelled to explain the truth behind the Axanar lawsuit. People get swept up in the colorful legal motions being filed by both sides. Those are just theater. What is important is behind the scenes. This conflict, far from possibly facilitating the official licensing of Star Trek fan films, is holding them up—badly, wasting everybody’s time and hurting regular people.

Ideally, not-for-profit Star Trek fan films would be simple for fans to register and legally distribute. It’s not far-fetched: Lucasfilm has official rules for Star Wars fan films and even offers awards and makes available downloads of sounds and music (http://www.starwars.com/star-wars-fan-film-awards). However, Star Wars is an easier property to administer than Star Trek: it has a shorter history, a sole owner (although acquired by Disney, Lucasfilm is administratively intact) and a younger audience that seems interested in making a different kind of fan film—shorts (limited by the rules to five minutes) rather than the hour-long episodes of Star Trek.

For Star Trek fan films to be legitimized, it will take an enormous amount of work and risk for sympathetic CBS executives. (CBS owns the Star Trek intellectual property and television rights, while Paramount Pictures owns the movie rights. For purposes of this article, I will refer solely to CBS as they administer Star Trek licensing.) First and most importantly, CBS cannot do anything that even remotely sets a legal precedent of compromising its rights to Star Trek. That’s how people get fired. Executives would have to convince their colleagues and lawyers at multiple levels to help devise this…why? There’s no money in it—it’s good P.R. and that’s about it. It actually loses money, because of the time they have to spend supervising it. There is every reason for bosses and lawyers to say no and almost no reason to say yes. This is why, prior to CBS suing Axanar, CBS officially pretended like the fan films did not exist—it was legally and bureaucratically the only way to let them exist.

Secondly, you have to figure out how to make sure nobody profits off of the fan films. But “non-profit” is not the standard that should apply. The real standard should be “non-commercial.”

Fan films are produced by amateurs on a volunteer basis. (Sounds reasonable, right?) But films are expensive—there’s no way around that. Even if people contribute volunteer labor, there are production needs that cost hard money: from locations and equipment to food. “Mission creep” inspires the producers to seek better talent behind and in front of the cameras, and raise money to pay for it. They go from family and friends pitching in, to soliciting private donations, to using crowdsourcing (on Kickstarter, Indiegogo, et al.) to raise six and even seven figures. (That’s not hypothetical, that’s what happened.)

So let’s say CBS establishes official fan film rules. I am truly at a loss as to how they would police them. It’s like they’d have to become the NCAA. Do you limit donations to…what? An arbitrary number? Do you ban the use of crowdsourcing platforms (tilting the playing field towards the independently wealthy)? Audit people to ensure compliance? Who pays for that?

There has to be some financial definition of non-commercial but I’m not sure you can put a number on it. No matter the rules you devise to keep the fan films amateur and non-commercial, some (not all) will find loopholes. Make a limit of $50,000 per fan film and you will see them produced in 15-minute segments. Make it $50,000 per hour and you will push money underground. Allow appeals for exceptions and you will be deluged in appeals. Fans are motivated enough to make their own Star Trek episodes—of course they will be determined and clever enough to find ways to raise more money and make better films.

Which brings us to Axanar.

If there was any way to abuse CBS’ goodwill in looking the other way on the fan films, Axanar did—and then some. This is something they and their followers will dispute…but please. They raised over a million dollars in multiple efforts. They used their donor funds to lease a warehouse in Castaic (an hour north of Los Angeles) and turn it into a soundstage which they bragged would be a base for ongoing commercial ventures. They attempted to cast their film through the Hollywood agencies with professional talent. They shamelessly ran a store for bootleg Star Trek merchandise under the guise of “perks” for “donors” (like Axanar coffee—not making that up). They fostered an atmosphere—or at least did not discourage it—that Axanar was true Star Trek and the J.J. Abrams films were dogshit. They got in fights with other fan films. They built a cult of personality around the principal (what could go wrong?). Lately, they’ve taken to censoring negative comments on their official website and forums like a bad parody of a communist state.

Personality matters, and the personality of the Axanar principal has rubbed people the wrong way. By his own admission, he paid himself a salary because Axanar is his full-time job. Sorry, but this is the opposite of what making a fan film is supposed to be. Axanar is not a hobby, it is a profession, allowing him to enjoy the lifestyle of a film producer and specifically a Star Trek film producer: adulation, creative fulfillment, travel, glamour and attention, paid for by Star Trek fans. Sure, it’s hard work, and relatively low-pay, but it’s exactly what he wants to do—be the captain of his own Star Trek ship. (He even cast himself as Captain Garth until his team threatened to revolt over the obvious problem that he can’t act.)

This is why Axanar has developed a legion of “hate watchers” in addition to supporters—because the principal has made himself into a reality-show character. Some people love him, most love to hate him.

So let’s discuss the Axanar lawsuit. Having obtained pro bono counsel, Axanar is vigorously fighting back. There are three things they can achieve by doing this: 1) They can drag this out for months, if not years. 2) They can embarrass and annoy CBS through bad press. 3) They can, possibly, use the legal proceedings to turn up unflattering facts about CBS and Paramount’s finances, business deals and ownership of Star Trek.

If you think any of that (particularly no. 3) gives Axanar leverage, think again. All they are doing is making CBS dig in their heels. Legally, politically and in every possible way, CBS will never agree to a settlement that allows Axanar to be made. It would be a massive humiliation and an admission that they can be abused and bullied by people they perceive to be thieves. There is no way a corporation of that size (two corporations, actually) gets everybody to sign off on such a capitulation. Better to lose money than lose face.

It’s also impossible for Axanar to win their lawsuit. I won’t bother to dissect the court motions. If Axanar were to somehow prevail, it would basically means there’s no such thing as copyright. I would be shocked if they got as far as depositions, let alone trial. Just watch the principal’s web appearances (or don’t): what lawyer would allow him to be deposed?

So why is Axanar fighting the lawsuit? To some degree, because the principal is delusional—and he found a law firm that loves the publicity and is egging him on. But mostly, it’s because he has no idea how to get out of this mess. He just wants to postpone the disgrace of admitting he has failed his donors.

This is not a victimless crime. That $1.3 million Axanar raised came from real people, who love Star Trek and gave Axanar their precious cash to make more of it. And the principal behaved in such a reckless, egregious and self-aggrandizing way that he was bound to be sued. It’s shameful.

If Axanar wanted, they could end this lawsuit by the time you finished reading this article. All the principal has to do is call the CBS executives (he knows them) and offer this: 1) We will wind down operations completely and 2) refund as much donor money as we can on a pro-rata basis.

The problem is that CBS would say yes but add a third item: that the principal accepts a lifetime ban from any commercial involvement with Star Trek. We’re talking Pete Rose-banned-from baseball. He does not go on to make a documentary about Axanar, write the memoirs of Captain Garth, sell props and sign autographs at conventions. They want him to vanish off the face of the earth. That’s how much they loathe and distrust him.

Number three would probably prevent the principal from agreeing to this proposal. Because he likes being a big shot, and more importantly, he knows he will need the money that comes from being a minor Star Trek celebrity. And he’ll have nothing better to do.

The best way to help donors get over their disappointment that they will never see Axanar is to give them the script. I’ve read it (the final draft) and sorry…it’s not very good. It’s basically a fan film, servicing fan ideas, repetitive and shallow on any real level. But that’s beside the point. Axanar successfully made their donors think they were getting the best thing since sliced bread. When they eventually read the script, some people will still believe that. But most will go, “Oh…Okay.”

A thorny issue remains of what to do with the warehouse which Axanar spent donor money to lease and renovate into a shooting stage. In the short term, that stage has a significant “burn rate” that will exhaust the donor money and get Axanar evicted—unless Axanar leases it for commercial use. Both options are problematic. The stage cannot be liquidated (dismantled) in order to repay the donors, but clearly somebody—be it the landlord or the next tenant—is going to benefit from the donors’ largesse. CBS obviously would not want the Axanar principal, or John Does, to continue to operate the stage, because they cannot be allowed to benefit from their bad actions. Ideally there would be some kind of trustee who operates it commercially to make back the donors’ money and get them whole—perhaps a public auction of those rights…yuck, what a can of worms.

You may be saying, won’t CBS want damages? $150,000 per infringement or whatever it says in the lawsuit? Of course not. Does CBS want an article in The Hollywood Reporter that they are collecting donor money from a fan film in a legal settlement? No! Talk about the most odious press imaginable. I’ll bet Axanar could even get out of having to pay CBS’ court costs.

So this is the best-case scenario: Axanar shuts down, permanently, refunds as much money to donors as possible, and tries to help CBS with the P.R. mess. Eventually, CBS finds a way to authorize the fan films…minus Axanar, which will never be made.

I would bet anything that CBS would accept this—but CBS cannot propose it legally. Axanar needs to propose it and have CBS accept. Which they can do. It only takes a phone call.

Will Axanar do that? No. Not right now. It’s too painful for the principal. But eventually he’ll have to. And for the good of everybody, it needs to be sooner rather than later.

Why am I writing this?

Because as much as I love hate-watching Axanar, I empathize with all the people being hurt by this fiasco: Primarily, the Star Trek fans who gave their money. But there are also the makers of the other fan films (now in jeopardy), the CBS executives dealing with this shit (better people than anybody realizes), and even the John Does at Axanar who just wanted to make a Star Trek film.

This needs to end. And for it to end, public pressure needs to mount on Axanar to throw in the towel, refund the donor money and accept humiliation and punishment. If CBS can get out from under this madness, I have no doubt they will make a good-faith effort to license the fan films. They just can’t do that in a climate of people raising hundreds of thousands of dollars in Kickstarter money and using Star Trek as a license to print money. That’s their job.

I’m joking, but not really. Ordinarily I’d stand for the little guy against the giant corporations—but this is different. The Axanar principal is stealing something that doesn’t belong to him to make money and have fun, and that’s offensive to all of us who live our lives not stealing things, even though we may want to. It’s that simple.

The Axanar principal needs to see that his public support from Star Trek fans is crumbling. He has to get to the point where he sees there is no way out, because only then will he fall on his sword and martyr himself to help all the future Star Trek fan films (if not his).

Forward this essay to all Star Trek fans.

Now you know…and knowing is half the battle!
I rarely make it through posts that long, but very well done.
PS-You are "Lucky Bastard" Kendall? :-)
 
Last edited:
Fan films are produced by amateurs on a volunteer basis. (Sounds reasonable, right?) But films are expensive—there’s no way around that. Even if people contribute volunteer labor, there are production needs that cost hard money: from locations and equipment to food. “Mission creep” inspires the producers to seek better talent behind and in front of the cameras, and raise money to pay for it. They go from family and friends pitching in, to soliciting private donations, to using crowdsourcing (on Kickstarter, Indiegogo, et al.) to raise six and even seven figures. (That’s not hypothetical, that’s what happened.)

This is where the contradiction comes in for me. It isn't a fan film if you need outside revenue to make it.

CBS needs to set two simple rules: 1) No fundraising. 2) No selling of the product or anything related to it.
 
Is it just part of a prudent legal strategy that C/P is so silent? Lots of comments here and within other social media platforms, but I am not reading about any Communication from the Mother Ship? Low profile to keep fan chatter directed away? Legal instruction? Distracted with the New Series? Shy?

Absolutely. They actually ARE professionals.
 
How Axanar Needs to End

By Lukas Kendall

First off, fantastic write up!

If there was any way to abuse CBS’ goodwill in looking the other way on the fan films, Axanar did—and then some. This is something they and their followers will dispute…but please. They raised over a million dollars in multiple efforts. They used their donor funds to lease a warehouse in Castaic (an hour north of Los Angeles) and turn it into a soundstage which they bragged would be a base for ongoing commercial ventures. They attempted to cast their film through the Hollywood agencies with professional talent. They shamelessly ran a store for bootleg Star Trek merchandise under the guise of “perks” for “donors” (like Axanar coffee—not making that up). They fostered an atmosphere—or at least did not discourage it—that Axanar was true Star Trek and the J.J. Abrams films were dogshit. They got in fights with other fan films. They built a cult of personality around the principal (what could go wrong?). Lately, they’ve taken to censoring negative comments on their official website and forums like a bad parody of a communist state.

I'm not sure anyone else could have written the above any better than this. All excellent points that need to be considered by Axanar supporters. It's the simple truth. (And yes, I used to support Axanar too!)

Personality matters, and the personality of the Axanar principal has rubbed people the wrong way. By his own admission, he paid himself a salary because Axanar is his full-time job. Sorry, but this is the opposite of what making a fan film is supposed to be. Axanar is not a hobby, it is a profession, allowing him to enjoy the lifestyle of a film producer and specifically a Star Trek film producer: adulation, creative fulfillment, travel, glamour and attention, paid for by Star Trek fans.

Exactly! CBS / Paramount did not ask him to become a full-time producer of his own Star Trek show / movie. They are fully within their rights to go after him for how he's treated this whole thing. He's living his dream, so to speak, however he was never given permission to do it. CBS and Paramount actually hire people to make Star Trek as their full-time job. They are the only ones who can do that.

This needs to end. And for it to end, public pressure needs to mount on Axanar to throw in the towel, refund the donor money and accept humiliation and punishment.

I do agree with this.. I suppose the question that I have is, how can we publicly put more pressure on them to throw in the towel? (as in examples I suppose).

The problem is that CBS would say yes but add a third item: that the principal accepts a lifetime ban from any commercial involvement with Star Trek. We’re talking Pete Rose-banned-from baseball. He does not go on to make a documentary about Axanar, write the memoirs of Captain Garth, sell props and sign autographs at conventions.

This is actually something I was wondering about and I think is the only way forward. I don't hate Alec Peters although I question his behavior and the things he's done in his past. With how he's exploited people and Trek I think that this is the best option. It would suck for sure but he's dug himself into this hole by not being honest. In the end CBS and Paramount need to protect themselves from people like him. I would actually be okay with Axanar moving forward (even with RMB still there) if Alec had nothing to do with it anymore.

The Axanar principal needs to see that his public support from Star Trek fans is crumbling. He has to get to the point where he sees there is no way out, because only then will he fall on his sword and martyr himself to help all the future Star Trek fan films (if not his).

This is actually the one thing that I fear the most. Alec coming out of this saying that he saved all fan-films when it's clear that his actions have had a negative effect on them right now. Sadly, it's the type of thing he'll likely do.
 
How Axanar Needs to End

By Lukas Kendall

...

Now you know…and knowing is half the battle!
Well written.

My only quibble is that this is not a PR nightmare. Axa fans are a tiny subset of Trek fans, and older school Trek fans (for the most part) to boot. This is also why CBS/Paramount aren't saying anything in public. There is no reason to dignify the complaints of the fly that is smashed by your windshield.

As for the Valencia property, there's no reason why C/P can't get it in a settlement and then pass management off to a company, perhaps to sell the interests. Nice PR to give that money back to the fans or to a charity, but not necessary. If Axa fans complain that the money should have gone back to the donors, they might want to be reminded of the rules of crowdfunding, and what AP has been telling them - that they don't get refunds under the current system. This is one of the reasons I've been telling donors to look into other options for refunds. A few were given out, yes, as that made it possible to eject people from the donors' group on FB (there was no perk to fulfill if there was no donation). Then that well dried up.

Other wells are far from dry:
  • Charge back on credit cards
  • Complaints to Square or Paypal or any other $$ provider
  • Complaints to the donor's bank
  • Communications with a local crusading consumer affairs reporter looking for an interesting story
  • Formal complaint lodged with the California State Attorney General's office, or the equivalent in a donor's country if the donor is not American
But you're right. C/P will want the entire operation shut down and a Pete Rose-style ending. Possibly also their props back (after all, they are an asset owned by AP and could be a part of a settlement. This would also rather neatly keep them from being used in some potential future museum or traveling exhibit).
 
If CBS can get out from under this madness, I have no doubt they will make a good-faith effort to license the fan films.

I have doubts that any brand owner would ever seriously consider licensing fan films. Letting them slide and go under the radar is one thing, but officially sanctioning them is another matter entirely. It could create a similar slippery slope to the very one they are trying to avoid by allowing Axanar to continue.

No, the best case scenario is that Axanar is shut down and future fan-filmmakers learn never to cross that invisible line again.
 
This is where the contradiction comes in for me. It isn't a fan film if you need outside revenue to make it.

CBS needs to set two simple rules: 1) No fundraising. 2) No selling of the product or anything related to it.
Fundraising is just a way to let more fans participate in a fan film. Otherwise only independently wealthy people could make a decent product.

And CBS can't set rules explicitly without giving the appearance of waiving their IP rights.
 
This is where the contradiction comes in for me. It isn't a fan film if you need outside revenue to make it.

CBS needs to set two simple rules: 1) No fundraising. 2) No selling of the product or anything related to it.

This is exactly right, and I expect that the upshot of this will be the end of fan films being able to use online crowd funding to raise money. CBS won't and effectively can't monitor everything that folks do but they can make it impractical for folks to publicly ask people on the Web to give them money with the promise of producing something for them to consume.

So, the end of that will and probably should happen.
 
Last edited:
If you want to get a taste of how AP and his director characterize trolls, go find the axanar podcast 31 on libsyn and start listening about minute 35 more or less. it takes a while to build, but what they say will get your attention. If you can stick it out you can also hear some sexist idiocy and a big personal dis of a TOS star before it all ends.

In fact if you haven't listened to the whole thing, its worth it to become crystal clear about these guys.
Thanks for the reminder! This was the podcast that stood out to me as highlighting the honest characteristics of these people - and how much they loved themselves! Very illuminating.

@Lukas Kendall, I'm repeating what others have said but: Great article! :techman: Long, but worth it.
 
I think we're already seeing the end of that. Look at how much Star Trek Continues has raised with their current fundraiser.

Neil


Yep. A little karmic, there.

Look, there's no entitlement to fan films. Originally they were a hobby driven by the enthusiasm and ingenuity of their creators. Then - surprise! - it turns out that there's a demand for entertainment produced by enthusiasts primarily for other knowledgeable enthusiasts - essentially a market, underserved by the studios but willing to exchange money for product that satisfies them.

Then finally, along comes the piece that enables that market to get money to the producers in exchange for product: crowdfunding, an idea innovative and idiosyncratic enough to blur the essential nature of the transaction.

It's almost the definition of how and why businesses work. No wonder it took only a couple of years for all the lines to be crossed.
 
Yes, I am that Lukas Kendall - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0447620, www.filmscoremonthly.com

Thank you for your nice words.

Yes, it's a longshot if not impossible for the fan films to be licensed/sanctioned/legitimized. If I'm CBS, I would need them to sign an agreement that's draconian in keeping all rights to Star Trek and the newly created derivative work for CBS while absolving the studio for any responsibility for the content or consequences. (What happens if God forbid somebody dies making one?) It's a TON of work for the studio. They would need to assign a CBS rep who is the judge, jury and executioner of the fan productions—okaying budgets, scripts, and final cuts. Possible, but a massive leap of faith and basically an act of charity on the part of CBS. It also raises all kinds of thorny issues having to do with WGA royalties due to writers any characters or concepts used, not using any actor likenesses, not using any actual Star Trek music recordings (due to AFM union issues) and much more.

All I know is that as long as there are abusers like Axanar, it's absolutely impossible for CBS to try.

Incidentally, I think we've already seen with the announcement of the new show a lessening in the demand for the fan films.

Lukas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top