I'm sure their "chief technologist" is working hard to fix the problem.
CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar
- Thread starter Richard Baker
- Start date
- Status
Lord Foot In Mouth - aka Alec Peters.
Mr. Lane, via Axamonitor: “Alec does not own Axanar Productions and has never claimed to.”
My recollection was that the California S Corporation filing listed Alec as the 100% shareholder. Last I heard, if you own 100% of the stock, you are the owner.
While looking for a source for this, I stumbled upon something else peculiar. According to this site, there is an "Axanar Productions" filed in Nevada in 2012 with Alec as all the officers: http://www.nevadacorporates.com/corp/449843.html
Is this just bad data? What is this about?
My recollection was that the California S Corporation filing listed Alec as the 100% shareholder. Last I heard, if you own 100% of the stock, you are the owner.
While looking for a source for this, I stumbled upon something else peculiar. According to this site, there is an "Axanar Productions" filed in Nevada in 2012 with Alec as all the officers: http://www.nevadacorporates.com/corp/449843.html
Is this just bad data? What is this about?
Not sure what gets asked more often; what LFIM means, or who's Cash Markman?
I'm expecting the report to be filled with nonsense. I've already had Axanar defenders of the faith spreading across my social media (and trying to join our club groups - despite being in the wrong country to join a British fan club) so I'm guessing there's some troop rallying in prep to fight against anyone pointing out huge inaccuracies in the numbers.
I'm expecting the report to be filled with nonsense. I've already had Axanar defenders of the faith spreading across my social media (and trying to join our club groups - despite being in the wrong country to join a British fan club) so I'm guessing there's some troop rallying in prep to fight against anyone pointing out huge inaccuracies in the numbers.
Alec must fear a donor lawsuit more than the IRS if he is willing to let Mr. Lane claim that "donor funds were not used for personal expenses" because
a) donor funds were kept in Alec's personal account and spent freely as he desired without clear records, at the same time Alec was claiming in public that they were 'operating as a California not for profit'
b) all corporate law wrt/ taxes, withholdings etc was just flat out ignored
c) "if the above is sloppy bookkeeping... people have advised him of this"
Lessee.
?
Nope.
More like
a) donor funds were kept in Alec's personal account and spent freely as he desired without clear records, at the same time Alec was claiming in public that they were 'operating as a California not for profit'
b) all corporate law wrt/ taxes, withholdings etc was just flat out ignored
c) "if the above is sloppy bookkeeping... people have advised him of this"
Lessee.
?Nope.
More like
Last edited:
I don't recall it being on his analysis of corporation tie-ins. Wonder if it filed taxes last year?
Despite it being only hearsay legally, I am truly dazzled by Mr. Lane's enthusiastic cutting away of all the security-by-obscurity defenses Axanar could have against government action.
And at the same time, how either he or Axanar could think it a *good* thing to tell questioning donors and the press that the money was just going into Alec's pocket like a sole proprietorship, when they advertised it and created it otherwise. That makes the stink of redirecting most of it into an investment he owns even worse.
And at the same time, how either he or Axanar could think it a *good* thing to tell questioning donors and the press that the money was just going into Alec's pocket like a sole proprietorship, when they advertised it and created it otherwise. That makes the stink of redirecting most of it into an investment he owns even worse.
Maybe they were full of women?
No, just pictures of Boomer.
You don't need to be a tax expert to understand that piling the money up all together is a bad idea. The IRS wants real live concrete numbers, not 'almost $50k' or '17% of whatever the hell I made'.
Providing the benefit of every single doubt in the universe still makes this spectacularly poor bookkeeping, and all by a person who was required to take Tax Law (because it's on the Bar exam).
Providing the benefit of every single doubt in the universe still makes this spectacularly poor bookkeeping, and all by a person who was required to take Tax Law (because it's on the Bar exam).
I'd love to see the IRS make LFIM squirm just as bad as the next person, but anymore, I doubt it'll happen
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...7000-jobs-will-that-help-you-escape-an-audit/
http://federalnewsradio.com/managem...ring-freeze-throw-customer-service-curveball/
Some more shoes are going to have to drop first to raise his profile and make him a more tempting target for prosecution.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...7000-jobs-will-that-help-you-escape-an-audit/
http://federalnewsradio.com/managem...ring-freeze-throw-customer-service-curveball/
Some more shoes are going to have to drop first to raise his profile and make him a more tempting target for prosecution.
Perhaps there is a tripwire somewhere that makes the case qualitatively different. Not filing at all, vs just omitting reports of some compensation? Also, having a history of bankruptcy might raise some priority flags, one could speculate.
If there is one thing I know about the IRS is that EVENTUALLY they will find you. If may take years but they will find you. It doesn't take much for a computer to review which corporations have not filed returns and raise flags.
The Nevada listing is correct; it was the first iteration of Axanar Productions Inc. Peters let the Nevada registration lapse and he registered the corporation in California in 2015.
To the person who had see any part of this posting about axanar. I do think you should go to this writers guild of america west Look for the BASIC AGREEMENT OF writers guild of america west. It is a 630 pgs of a pdf file if you want to read the pdf you eill look at the rules that they have gave to axanar to go by. I DON'T think any of you would go by this if you do a story or any part of writer your way of story or make on a film or for the internet?, i will not use it. You should just read the full pdf file DON'T skip no pages. Then you come back to this page and post your comments about this then?.
- Status