I think STNV and STC might be ok, based on the fact that what they're doing is making new episodes of a 50 year old cancelled tv show. (Note that STC complied with the request to change its logo, presumably to avoid confusion.)
Axanar, in contrast, can be seen as in direct competition with the new stuff CBS and Paramount are producing.
Add to that the salaries and merch, and BOOM. Heads explode.
I think STNV and STC might be ok, based on the fact that what they're doing is making new episodes of a 50 year old cancelled tv show. (Note that STC complied with the request to change its logo, presumably to avoid confusion.)
Axanar, in contrast, can be seen as in direct competition with the new stuff CBS and Paramount are producing.
Add to that the salaries and merch, and BOOM. Heads explode.
I think that they'll be fine, but I think that they may get more restricted in what is and is not allowed to happen.
I haven't read today's blog post yet, but I have enjoyed reading previous ones. Thanks for doing the work. It's very informative.I think STNV and STC might be ok, based on the fact that what they're doing is making new episodes of a 50 year old cancelled tv show. (Note that STC complied with the request to change its logo, presumably to avoid confusion.)
Axanar, in contrast, can be seen as in direct competition with the new stuff CBS and Paramount are producing.
Add to that the salaries and merch, and BOOM. Heads explode.
I think that they'll be fine, but I think that they may get more restricted in what is and is not allowed to happen.
STC also filed for tax-exempt non-profit status, as I noted on my blog today. This means they have to file fairly detailed financial reports and disclosure statements with the IRS. I reviewed the bulk of the materials today and it goes far beyond what Peters and Axanar put out in their annual report.
To be clear, Axanar Productions is a closely held for-profit business corporation. Legally, Peters doesn't have to disclose a damn thing to the public. But by seeking nonprofit status and going through the IRS, STC is at least making an effort to show CBS it is complying with its non-profit requirement for unlicensed productions.
I haven't read today's blog post yet, but I have enjoyed reading previous ones. Thanks for doing the work. It's very informative.I think that they'll be fine, but I think that they may get more restricted in what is and is not allowed to happen.
STC also filed for tax-exempt non-profit status, as I noted on my blog today. This means they have to file fairly detailed financial reports and disclosure statements with the IRS. I reviewed the bulk of the materials today and it goes far beyond what Peters and Axanar put out in their annual report.
To be clear, Axanar Productions is a closely held for-profit business corporation. Legally, Peters doesn't have to disclose a damn thing to the public. But by seeking nonprofit status and going through the IRS, STC is at least making an effort to show CBS it is complying with its non-profit requirement for unlicensed productions.
STC's efforts to keep everything above board is encouraging. It's my favorite fan production and I'd hate to see it go away.
Slightly off topic, but lets make these guys honorary members of the forum
Slightly off topic, but lets make these guys honorary members of the forum
CBS is keeping watch on a lot of stuff and taking action.
The comments on the Enterprise-D Restoration Facebook link are gold. Particularly Peters:
![]()
Peters and others are all over there. Even Paul Dykstra is defending Axanar. I'm not sure if this is reality anymore, or just fantasy.
CBS is keeping watch on a lot of stuff and taking action.
I really think they should directly issue a statement to notify everyone at once what their intentions are rather than having this sort of thing just filter through via hearsay and rumor.
I'm curious... Is it possible for an actor in the US to "waive" their fee
Slightly off topic, but lets make these guys honorary members of the forum
Each disk more pornographic than the last.
CBS is keeping watch on a lot of stuff and taking action.
I really think they should directly issue a statement to notify everyone at once what their intentions are rather than having this sort of thing just filter through via hearsay and rumor.
I haven't read today's blog post yet, but I have enjoyed reading previous ones. Thanks for doing the work. It's very informative.STC also filed for tax-exempt non-profit status, as I noted on my blog today. This means they have to file fairly detailed financial reports and disclosure statements with the IRS. I reviewed the bulk of the materials today and it goes far beyond what Peters and Axanar put out in their annual report.
To be clear, Axanar Productions is a closely held for-profit business corporation. Legally, Peters doesn't have to disclose a damn thing to the public. But by seeking nonprofit status and going through the IRS, STC is at least making an effort to show CBS it is complying with its non-profit requirement for unlicensed productions.
STC's efforts to keep everything above board is encouraging. It's my favorite fan production and I'd hate to see it go away.
Having done a good deal of nonprofit filings back in the day, I have to say STC's filings are exceptionally well done. I've never seen any of their episodes, but the guys running the operation clearly know how to talk to the IRS.
While I'm on the subject, and in response to Peters' comments that STC also pays people, a couple of notable items from the STC filings:
(1) "[STC] has no employees; it has many volunteers and a few professional independent contractors. As with the directors above, these individuals do receive expense reimbursements not exceeding $1000 per episode or, to date, $2000 per tax year."
(2) "ome of the professional 'guest stars,' episode directors, stage managers, cinematographers, video editors, special effects experts, etc. have been compensated in sums approaching $4000 per year – about $500-$2500 per episode, depending on the skill level. All are working for approximately 10% of the amount they would usually bill a for-profit production company."
Slightly off topic, but lets make these guys honorary members of the forum
Each disk more pornographic than the last.
Given these are 5.25 floppies, all 200 probably contain a total of three pictures at best.![]()
I'm curious... Is it possible for an actor in the US to "waive" their fee
From my understanding SAGafra members have to be paid at least scale... But can donate that back to the production should they choose...
I haven't read today's blog post yet, but I have enjoyed reading previous ones. Thanks for doing the work. It's very informative.
STC's efforts to keep everything above board is encouraging. It's my favorite fan production and I'd hate to see it go away.
Having done a good deal of nonprofit filings back in the day, I have to say STC's filings are exceptionally well done. I've never seen any of their episodes, but the guys running the operation clearly know how to talk to the IRS.
While I'm on the subject, and in response to Peters' comments that STC also pays people, a couple of notable items from the STC filings:
(1) "[STC] has no employees; it has many volunteers and a few professional independent contractors. As with the directors above, these individuals do receive expense reimbursements not exceeding $1000 per episode or, to date, $2000 per tax year."
(2) "ome of the professional 'guest stars,' episode directors, stage managers, cinematographers, video editors, special effects experts, etc. have been compensated in sums approaching $4000 per year – about $500-$2500 per episode, depending on the skill level. All are working for approximately 10% of the amount they would usually bill a for-profit production company."
You really should watch them. They're doing good work, and getting better with every episode.
Instead of bashing Vic and STC, Peters should have been studying that operation and learning how to do it the right way. But ego and ambition have been the downfall of many a great man, and a buttload of not so great ones.
I'm curious... Is it possible for an actor in the US to "waive" their fee
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.