RMB can easily prove that calling AP a liar is not defamation, as there is very public evidence of his lying.
As for the "loan"; he would need to prove that it was a loan rather than pay-for-services; such evidence would be a loan contract, installment agreement or statement. I highly doubt such documents actually exist.
I think RMB would be smart to try and have it dismissed on grounds of improper jurisdiction; let AP try and refile in CA.
As for the "loan"; he would need to prove that it was a loan rather than pay-for-services; such evidence would be a loan contract, installment agreement or statement. I highly doubt such documents actually exist.
I think RMB would be smart to try and have it dismissed on grounds of improper jurisdiction; let AP try and refile in CA.