More from the jury foreman:
Link
That was certainly my take on all the "partying" nonsense presented by the prosecution and particularly for its use as a motivation for premeditated murder: really weak, and of course no substitute for evidence of the crime in question.
"Much of the time we were in that trial," he added, "much of it dealt with her actions afterwards. And that's something that, although it is disgusting, it is heinous, we weren't really able to take into consideration with the coming down with the verdict with the indictments."
.
.
.
They eventually found Casey Anthony, 25, not guilty of murdering Caylee, but guilty of lying to police four times during their investigation.
"We knocked those out right away because the evidence was there," the jury foreman said, referring to the guilty charges.
.
.
.
"When the prosecution rested ... I was stunned," he said. "I thought there would be more. I really did. And I was waiting for more. ... A lot of us felt that way, that there was not enough evidence to fill in the gray area that we needed to be filled in."
"We don't know the cause of death," he said in a portion of the interview aired Monday. "Everything was speculation."
On the other hand, the prosecution gave details on Casey Anthony's partying, perhaps as a circumstantial case for a motive.
"Motive was not something that we had to prove, or anything," the jury foreman said. "We felt that the motive that the state provided, in our eyes, was just kind of weak -- you know, that a mother go out and do something like that to her child just so she could go out and party. That's what was presented to us."
Link
That was certainly my take on all the "partying" nonsense presented by the prosecution and particularly for its use as a motivation for premeditated murder: really weak, and of course no substitute for evidence of the crime in question.