RR, B...or not a B should have come with a warning.![]()
RR, B...or not a B should have come with a warning.![]()
Like this: Warning: Light-hearted Shakespearean parody ahead?-- RR
RR, B...or not a B should have come with a warning.![]()
Like this: Warning: Light-hearted Shakespearean parody ahead?-- RR
Works for me.Wow, two different Stewart Sesame Street clips in the same day. Too fun.
And to the OP. Most have pretty well made the case already, but Picard was probably one of the most developed characters in all of Trek. Is there room for more? Sure there's always room for more. But do we really need to know if he prefers, boxers or briefs? At some point you have to say 'enough'.
Like this: Warning: Light-hearted Shakespearean parody ahead?-- RR
Works for me.Wow, two different Stewart Sesame Street clips in the same day. Too fun.
And to the OP. Most have pretty well made the case already, but Picard was probably one of the most developed characters in all of Trek. Is there room for more? Sure there's always room for more. But do we really need to know if he prefers, boxers or briefs? At some point you have to say 'enough'.
Precisely. Was the OP pulling our leg? The most undeveloped characters on TNG were probably Beverly, Deanna, and Geordi, in that order of lack of development. We know a great deal about the characters and families of Picard, Riker, Worf, even andorid Data, and even met most of their relations, like Picard's dead parents, Yvette and Maurice, his brother, sister-in-law, and nephew. -- RR
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.