See, I disagree with this. Picard certainly would not be thrilled that a crew member brought this up to a new species, but I really don't think he would prioritize the Prime Directive over a plea for asylum after seeing the way he fought for Data and refused to commit genocide against the Borg, even knowing first hand how menacing they are.I have no problem with the episode, and I like Archer. Bakula's one of my favorite captains.
The problem is this - in a lot of episodes they screw up, which means the captain - Archer - takes full responsibility. In that episode, he couldn't. Nothing that happened was his fault - he did what hehad to do in a bad situation. Pikard would have done the same - you can't insult a species you just met... thats bad for business. Especially when the Federation doesn't even exist yet - you'll get a bad reputation when word gets around. he had to throw Trip under the bus so Starfleet didn't look like they did anything wrong, which they didn't.
And speaking as a Navy veteran, I'd be more than little nonplussed at being thrown under the bus for something leadership had very clearly set a precedent for more than once, as Trip rightfully pointed out to Archer. Literally the only difference between the Vissisns and every other species Archer thought fit to interfere with is that he and the other Captain became BFFs in quick fashion. Gotta love cronyism.
Given Sisko's decision in "Cardassians", I'm not sure things would have gone significantly differently in this case.
Heck, if the writers had really wanted to go dark in that episode, they might have had Rugal kill himself rather than leave with his biological father.
In the end, we were supposed to feel very sorry for both aliens... what do you guys think was the better outcome? I feel like, in a way, Riker's 'friend' died as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.