Temis the Vorta said:So in the end, Jedi precognition is their true weapon. They could just as easily be carrying blasters. But by carrying lightsabers, they psych non-Force-users out by sending the message that they're so unbeatable, they can go into battle with a weapon whose only advantage is that it looks cool.![]()
I feel compelled to point out the ability to cut through nearly anything is a pretty useful thing lightsabers do that blasters don't. The other major aspect of their use is that they are defensive - they block blaster bolts and incinerate bullets, but only in the hands of force sensitives. They also double as flashlights
I think Darth Sion summed up Jedi in combat perfectly when he said "The Force is a blade, without it one is defenseless."
As for forcefields, I can't recall anyone in the PT/OT era of star wars running around with personal shields. Destroyer droids have them, but presumably there is something about shield generators that precludes an organic being from simply strapping one on.
Modern fencing sabres have virtually no weight. People use them just fine.
(snigger) Flying Guillotine...
Modern fencing sabres have virtually no weight. People use them just fine.
They can't cut a person in half. Well, it'd take a very long time, anyway...
The thing that always gets me about lightsaber use in the SWU is that, if the Jedi and Sith are Force-users, and have telekinesis, they shouldn't even *be* fencing - they should be standing somewhere else, concentrating on making the weapon zip around in the air. And by extension, a lightsaber is therefore not the best weapon for a Force user... They need a Flying Guillotine or something...
Why couldn't a blaster be designed to blast through anything? Just use the same "material" as a lightsaber does. You cut with "bullets" rather than a blade. If you want a long, thin, blade-like cut, you change the pattern of the bullets. (I'd want to have many different patterns under my control from concentrated point to buckshot-scatter).I feel compelled to point out the ability to cut through nearly anything is a pretty useful thing lightsabers do that blasters don't.
Oh right, that's what I want. A stealth nanobot lightsaber. I'm thinking that it would be remote-controlled mechanically but if you can command them via telekinesis, so much the better.They need a Flying Guillotine or something...
You're all forgetting the first description of a lightsaber. "A more civilized weapon, for a more civilized time."
The Jedis don't use a lightsaber because it's the best weapon. They use it out of tradition and a sense of chivalry.
You're all forgetting the first description of a lightsaber. "A more civilized weapon, for a more civilized time."
The Jedis don't use a lightsaber because it's the best weapon. They use it out of tradition and a sense of chivalry.
Why couldn't a blaster be designed to blast through anything? Just use the same "material" as a lightsaber does. You cut with "bullets" rather than a blade. If you want a long, thin, blade-like cut, you change the pattern of the bullets. (I'd want to have many different patterns under my control from concentrated point to buckshot-scatter).
As far as I can tell, a lightsaber has an offensive component (cutting) and defensive (blocking). The defense is in essence a force field and the offense serves the same purpose as a blaster ray. But a blaster can also project force further away, and if you have all those bullet-pattern settings, you have a much more versatile instrument than a simple blade whose shape you can't alter.
Need new mods!!!!
Redesign the blaster to do what you want it to - constantly generate power if that's what you want. "Blaster" is just a generic term for energy gun. There isn't just one style.I think part of what enables the lightsaber to cut through anything is that it's constantly being generated - if you wanted the same effect with a blaster you'd need to hold down the trigger for however long you wanted to burn through.
Precision??? I'm in a fight, not doing brain surgery! (Well, very messy brain surgery, maybe.) Precision is not high on my wish list. I'd just as soon use TK to drop a boulder on my opponent from a great distance.Additionally, the precision needed to cut something at range would be much greater than melee.
Design a personal shield to do what you like - have panels whose angle can be controlled to play richochet. If lightsabers don't lose power, why should a personal shield be any different?Range as whole is less critical for jedi - they can use telekinesis. Personal shields are no substitute for a jedi-wielded lightsaber in terms of defense - they lose power and you can't choose where to redirect blaster fire.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.