• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Can a trimenase shuttle replacement work?

westwords2020

Commander
Red Shirt
Among the early concepts for the space shuttle back in the early seenties was an unique proposal in which three identicat spacecraft hulls were attached in a parallel stage arrangement that luanches the complete package horizontally.

The outer hulls flank the center hull which achieves orbit while the right and left flank vehicles at as a first stage and have turbofan flyback capability for reusability, landing horizontally.

Major advantage is that as all hulls are the same, you only design them once and save on design costs of seperate flyback boosters.

If the trimenese spaceframes are identical, then the common hulls would each contain a large cargo bay that in booster or first stage mode would be filled with propellants while the designated orbiter contained mission equipment. Any hull could be a booster first stage or orbiter as dictated by mission needs. It is not impossible for the flanking stages to carry a cargo pod that is jettisoned after engine burnout and before staging.

The orbiter would have sufficent payload capability to carry an unmanned spacecraft intended for geosyncronos orbit or on to the moon and beyond.

For safety, the crew would be housed in the nose with a launch escape tower that would pull the pilot/passenger nose to saftey wih an upward rather than side ejection.
 
The mockup models (similar to what you describe) that were made by the various aerospace companies bidding on the original Shuttle are sitting in a glass case by the Skylab mockup in the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum in D.C. They've been sitting there in that case for several decades....

Congress mandated the change from manned boosters lifting the Shuttle to using solid rockets back in the 70's to 'save a few bucks' (which it didn't).
 
Congress mandated the change from manned boosters lifting the Shuttle to using solid rockets back in the 70's to 'save a few bucks' (which it didn't).


What you meant to say is that Jake Garn got it pork-barrelled to get Morton-Thiokol more business in Utah with a multi-piece SRB design.

...and then Garn bumped Crista McAuliff off of STS-51D and onto STS-51L.




I think ill of few people...
 
Oh I agree with you there.... I've ranted for years on this board and others about the solids being the WRONG way to go.

We're down 2 Shuttles and two crews (about $5Billion) and now they're going to use the solids again in the next design - when and if it ever comes on line...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top