• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BUT I'm a cheerleader!

i just think this movie withstands scrutiny, and not only from those who dislike it or have major reservations about it.
That assumption is yet to be proven. :vulcan:
o.k. i'm game. give me something you have a problem with, and if i'm around, i'll try to address it.
but i have no interest in tit for tat debates. i only want to show that from another point of view, any of your problems could be considered a strength.
Well if you are willing to concede the point that this movie does not stand up to scrutiny, because that is the premise of your thread. And if you suggest a debate without point, counterpoint, rebuttal, can happen is beyond me. But if you are conceding your original point, then I will allow you the high ground and the advantage of disproving my points.


The problems I have with this movie is...
The overly comical handling of kirk's allergy (otherwise it would of been a nicely nugget from TWOH). The popeye hands is just too over the top, it didn’t fit into the rest of humour. It made the whole movie seem more galaxy quest like.

Cadets running the ship don’t bother me, it’s been done in TWOH, but never a whole fleet of cadets had been send into action. It seems that they mobilized the entire academy. Were all the regular officers dead? The whole fleet was send away seems a little too convenient.
It’s like the US navy sending out their entire cadets in Annapolis to face a threat in the sea of Japan, while the entire 7th fleet was called away to deal with some unnamed middle east situation.
Even in that unlikely scenario the 7th fleet or a detachment of it would be called back to deal with the situation rather than sending out a fleet load of cadets.
So for the entire fleet being called away to the Laurentian(sp) system does seem a bit convenient. A better approach would be to have it said the fleet was called away to the Deveron(sp) system a little nod to TNG. (Although still very contrived, but I would be willing to forgive it due to the TNG nod.)

Uhura being the only person that can speak romulan. (it seems like a gimmick to give uhura some ability). Before you go into saying how it’s an improvement over the line “open hailing frequencies”. I would say it’s been done before-Enterprise: Sato, and the audience of today would expect a communication officer actually being able to communicate. That gimmick of giving Uhura something to do serves no purpose. Uhura told the captain the romulans are attacking. And what did pike do? He still warped into the system and got his ass kicked. Only when Nero saw that it was the enterprise, he stopped attacking.
Now if Uhura never comes aboard. Pike warps into the system, gets his ass kicked. Nero stops because it’s the enterprise. Uhura made no contribution at all, they only gave her that nonsense about lighting storms just so that it doesn’t seem blantenly obivous, she's there just for sex appeal.
The only other part Uhura plays is to kiss spock.

The overall brashness of Kirk bothered me, he seemed more like a over spoiled brat that I want to bent over and spank, than a captain you would respect. You could argue the old Kirk is just as brash, but never to this degree. This nu-kirk seems to flaunt in the face of all rules, and it is an appeal to the rebellion spirit of teenagers. This is what this movie seems to be catered towards.


Nero, oh Nero, his only motivation seems to be "uh I'm crazy I want revenge". And if you are suggesting that the writers wanted to create a 1 dimensional character, then I say if the writers wanted stupid, they have succeeded in creating stupid. I am aware of the extreme irony of creating a character named Nero after the crazy roman emperor. Yes romulans, rome, Nero, we get it. As far as the cleverness goes, it ends at the name.

Spock's completely disregard for kirk's safety by ejecting him out of an escape pod. In what universe is that even considered acceptable for any commanding officer? Does Spock not realize that Kirk could die? (As it is shown how dangerous the planet is in the later scenes.) What surprised me is for Mccoy actually going along with it, after bending all the rules to get Kirk on board the Enterprise. This is shown in the scene where Spock actually thanking Mccoy for his support in sending Kirk to his death. All that bullshit Spock was spewing about breaking a stallion, do they not realize Kirk could die? This also made Spock seem petty and vindictive. If you argue that this is the new direction the writers want to take Spock, then I say thanks but no thanks. Are we to believe that in the new timeline vulcans act like klingons? And the USS Enterprise is now the IKS Enterprise? If so Spock should of pull out his d'k tahg and stabbed it into kirk's heart, for challenging his position.

The convenient way Kirk found old Spock on that icy planet. When Kirk was being attacked by that spider like creature, it is so reminiscent of the planet Hoth in star wars, I jokingly expected kirk to pull out a lightsaber. (I can forgive convenience but not the blatant attempt to make this movie more Star Wars like.)

That scene of Spock being provoked into showing emotion was weakly done. I'm surprised how little it took Spock to lose it. The intense emotion shown by Spock had ruined what it means to be a vulcan for me. Before you argue that Spock had just lost his planet and is due for an emotional outburst. Perhaps that is true, but the fact that Old Spock told Kirk the young Spock would lose it, this ruined all surprise and the intensity of the moment, coupled with the blinding lens flare that made me look away during the entire exchange to avoid blindness. Perhaps the lens flare did serve a purpose, was it to cover up the bad acting? Like how a MC covers up the mistakes of a DJ spinning on a turntable? The last comment made by Scotty “I like this ship, its exciting!” demoted Scotty from a miracle worker and a great engineer to a mere comic relief al-la Jar Jar Binks.

Only thing chekov was good at was a bad accent. (Oh and they did throw him a bone by giving him some transporter duties). Chekov was more than an accent, but they did not show it in this movie.

Scotty has a borderline eating disorder, rather than being a member of AA. (Too much cliché)

Sulu bringing a knife to a gun fight. Nuff said.

Red matter red matter, what does it matter? The whole thing about the red matter is just too over the top. For a science fiction movie to introduce something as huge as red matter without any explanations just proves the point that this movie is not a scifi by any means. (This red matter required me to lobotomize myself to begin the "suspension of disbelief)

The scene when Kirk fired on Nero at the end of the battle. Were they trying to go with the anti hero for kirk to fire on a helpless ship? If so the build up of kirk from the rest of the movie didn’t add up.

Kirk being promoted to captain...Nuff said.

And lets not forget about the corvette scene. That had all be discussed in the Nemesis thread which was closed due to immaturity on the part of the cheerleaders.

On the movie as a whole I think the post by startrekwatcher puts it rather nicely, and is deserving of mention.


So far, your attempt so show that the cheerleaders of this film have more than just 1 liners to boast about their movie, have been proven with numerous 1 liners posted on this thread. While the only concrete post is your original post and a negative review of this film.


I rest my case.
 
Last edited:
I thought this thread would be hot sexy cheerleaders talking about how they now love "star Trek" and wants to find nerds to make love to because of the movie. That or Uhura pics in a cheerleader outfut. Instead it is thoughtful analysis of the movie. :(


Jason
 
The overly comical handling of kirk's allergy (otherwise it would of been a nicely nugget from TWOH). The popeye hands is just too over the top, it didn’t fit into the rest of humour. It made the whole movie seem more galaxy quest like.

Since that never happened in 'Galaxy Quest' and Trek is no stranger to oddball humor like that, I don't really see your point, other than as a rather poor attempt to paint this film as being overly derivative of others, which you do again later with equally slim justifications.

Oh, and abnormally swollen hands are a not uncommon physiological reaction to a number of medical issues, from kidney failure, Lupus (sorry, Dr. House), spider bites, or to allergies like Kirk had to the fictional vaccine in the film.



Was it a goofy scene? Sure, intentionally so, but it got pretty decent and ongoing laughs from the audiences at both the screenings I saw as the scene progressed through the numb-tongue and Uhura's shocked reaction, so it's hard to call the scene too over-the-top to fail at being humorous.

Cadets running the ship don’t bother me, it’s been done in TWOH, but never a whole fleet of cadets had been send into action. It seems that they mobilized the entire academy. Were all the regular officers dead? The whole fleet was send away seems a little too convenient.
It’s like the US navy sending out their entire cadets in Annapolis to face a threat in the sea of Japan, while the entire 7th fleet was called away to deal with some unnamed middle east situation.
Even in that unlikely scenario the 7th fleet or a detachment of it would be called back to deal with the situation rather than sending out a fleet load of cadets.
I thought it was made pretty clear by the film that the Laurentian System must be quite a distance away from the Federation core worlds, since no ships could arrive from there in time to deal with either the Vulcan or Earth attacks (not even with the seemingly faster warp speeds evident in the film).

It wasn't a "whole fleet of cadets" as there were clearly existing officers serving aboard those ships, even on the Enterprise which hadn't been christened yet and thus likely had a smaller crew than most and needed more cadets. The numerous cadets were probably added primarily to assist in planetwide emergency responses on Vulcan; evacuation, first aid, and marshaling/relocation of refugees, since at that point Starfleet only thought it was massive seismic disturbances of some sort. Academy cadets from the various armed forces in the present day do often assist with emergencies and disaster relief. The cadets were probably also assigned in such great numbers to gain some real world experience in the field.

It's certainly not unprecedented in Trek for cadets to serve on active duty, as in TWoK which you mentioned, Nog serving aboard the Defiant, and Red Squad being assigned missions at the Academy (albeit in a coup attempt) and aboard the Valiant.

The whole fleet wasn't away, and this was one of the few times (First Contact being another) where Earth actually had a decent defense fleet of its own for a change. Well, before it was completely destroyed at Vulcan by Nero, at least.

So for the entire fleet being called away to the Laurentian(sp) system does seem a bit convenient. A better approach would be to have it said the fleet was called away to the Deveron(sp) system a little nod to TNG. (Although still very contrived, but I would be willing to forgive it due to the TNG nod.)
The Devron System is in the Romulan Neutral Zone. Thus meaning that the Federation would definitely be at war with the Romulans if they had an entire fleet "engaged" there, and making it seem odd that Pike would be surprised that the Romulans might be potential adversaries at Vulcan when mentioned by Kirk.

I fail to see how changing the name of the system makes it any better or different than what the Laurentian System was in the film, a plot device to separate the bulk of the fleet from Earth and Vulcan, thus requiring the presence of the ships at the space station and the use of the cadets. As such, it served better than the overused "The Enterprise is the only ship in range" line from numerous episodes and films, even though the ship would often travel numerous light years in said films and episodes, thus making it highly unlikely that Starfleet didn't have any other ships around (or no civilian vessels for that matter). At least here they provided something of a plausible explanation and didn't leave the Enterprise alone at first.

Uhura being the only person that can speak romulan. (it seems like a gimmick to give uhura some ability). Before you go into saying how it’s an improvement over the line “open hailing frequencies”. I would say it’s been done before-Enterprise: Sato, and the audience of today would expect a communication officer actually being able to communicate. That gimmick of giving Uhura something to do serves no purpose. Uhura told the captain the romulans are attacking. And what did pike do? He still warped into the system and got his ass kicked. Only when Nero saw that it was the enterprise, he stopped attacking.
Just because the Enterprise's current communications officer couldn't differentiate Romulan from Vulcan doesn't make him incompetent, as he could be fluent in other equally important languages (like Klingon, who were possibly who the Federation was at war with in the Laurentian System and were definitely a threat as early as the Kelvin incident judging by Starfleet's concern about them being involved). Uhura wasn't fluent in Klingon in ST:VI, so this actually kind of plays off that in the way. It makes sense for her to be assigned as a backup comms officer fluent in Romulan if the chief comms officer was fluent in other languages.

As far as Pike warping into the Vulcan system and not dropping out of warp sooner to avoid a trap, which is a frequent complaint I have read; he didn't know the condition of the fleet yet. As far as he knew, they were engaged in battle and needed backup as soon as possible. He'd look like a real douche if he dropped out of warp early while more ships were destroyed, which he could have possibly prevented. He had no way of knowing they had already been completely wiped out.

Now if Uhura never comes aboard. Pike warps into the system, gets his ass kicked. Nero stops because it’s the enterprise. Uhura made no contribution at all, they only gave her that nonsense about lighting storms just so that it doesn’t seem blantenly obivous, she's there just for sex appeal.
The only other part Uhura plays is to kiss spock.
They raised their shields because of Uhura's confirmation of Kirk's report, which allowed the ship to survive the first volley of torpedoes (Sulu said: "shields at 32%" & "we can't survive another hit like that") which otherwise would have destroyed them outright like they did the rest of the fleet if they were unshielded. Nero would never have had the chance to recognize it as the Enterprise then.

Uhura's primary role in relation to the other characters was that of dramatic and comedic foil to Kirk early on, and later as a pillar of emotional support for Spock, to show his inner conflict when he could not. She was the model rule-abiding and confident/competent but humble cadet as opposed to Kirk's rebellious and arrogant nature, and she rebuffed him more than once because of those qualities which she did not respect.

The overall brashness of Kirk bothered me, he seemed more like a over spoiled brat that I want to bent over and spank, than a captain you would respect. You could argue the old Kirk is just as brash, but never to this degree. This nu-kirk seems to flaunt in the face of all rules, and it is an appeal to the rebellion spirit of teenagers. This is what this movie seems to be catered towards.
Kirk's frequent actions or reputation in TOS, TMP, TWoK, TSfS, Trials & Tribblations, Flashback, and numerous other examples would seem to disagree. He was somewhat less arrogant than he was here, but then he was also much more wise and experienced by that point. I saw nothing in the movie that didn't strike me as being fairly consistent with an earlier version of the character we all know, albeit in a slightly different form due to different life experiences.

Nero, oh Nero, his only motivation seems to be "uh I'm crazy I want revenge". And if you are suggesting that the writers wanted to create a 1 dimensional character, then I say if the writers wanted stupid, they have succeeded in creating stupid.
I won't disagree with you here, as Nero as presented was poorly realized. Not through any fault of Bana, since he did a great job with what little he was given, but I don't think they should have left most of the antagonist's backstory and motivation for a comic to flesh out.

If I knew my planet was going to be destroyed in the future and I was given a second chance to save it in an alternate reality by throwing a piece of the magical red Happy Fun Ball at it, the superdupernova would have been my first destination. You can take care of bizarre vengeance plots against the only guy who was actually trying to help you and a Spock and Federation from an alternate reality who had nothing to do with it later.

Spock's completely disregard for kirk's safety by ejecting him out of an escape pod. In what universe is that even considered acceptable for any commanding officer? Does Spock not realize that Kirk could die? (As it is shown how dangerous the planet is in the later scenes.) What surprised me is for Mccoy actually going along with it, after bending all the rules to get Kirk on board the Enterprise. This is shown in the scene where Spock actually thanking Mccoy for his support in sending Kirk to his death. All that bullshit Spock was spewing about breaking a stallion, do they not realize Kirk could die? This also made Spock seem petty and vindictive. If you argue that this is the new direction the writers want to take Spock, then I say thanks but no thanks.
Though the scene made it seem as if Kirk was immediately ejected for comedic effect, I'm assuming that Spock didn't just set him down on a planet with a Federation outpost nearby at random, and that they looked it up first and provided Kirk with cold weather gear. Spock may not have known about the local wildlife however. There was certainly no indication that they thought they were sending Kirk "to his death," and the escape pod's computer told him about the Starfleet outpost nearby.

While simply throwing Kirk in the brig would have been more kosher to regulations, simpler, and would have made more sense plotwise, Spock truly was "emotionally compromised" by the destruction of his homeworld, so he should not be expected to act completely rationally. Plus, while Kirk was right in declaring that pursuing the Narada was the only viable option, he went about it in completely the wrong way by calling Spock out in front of the crew. Spock was an untested commander, the crew had just experienced a massive defeat and the loss of their captain, and here you have Kirk undermining Spock on the bridge, which is dangerous for morale in that tenuous situation. He could have possibly even led a mutiny for all Spock knew of this guy from knowing him just that one day.

As far as McCoy's "support" for Spock, I believe that was referring to where McCoy urged Kirk not to fight the security officers taking him to the brig or confining him to quarters at first, not to his being stranded on Delta Vega, which McCoy was clearly bothered by.

The convenient way Kirk found old Spock on that icy planet.
Yes, that was ridiculous. When I first read about young Kirk meeting old Spock long before the movie came out, my first assumption had been that either old Spock had tracked young Kirk down to get his assistance, or that Spock had been imprisoned aboard Nero's ship and met Kirk there during an escape. There were many less contrived ways of writing the whole Delta Vega sequence than how it went down.

Firstly, I would have just had Spock watching his planet being destroyed while still a prisoner abord Nero's ship and not have it be from a planet with the wrong name seemingly co-orbiting Vulcan. You could have had Kirk captured after his spacejump and in a cell with him, where they find a way to escape. Likewise, I wouldn't have followed it up with an equally implausible meeting with Scotty on the same planet.

When Kirk was being attacked by that spider like creature, it is so reminiscent of the planet Hoth in star wars, I jokingly expected kirk to pull out a lightsaber. (I can forgive convenience but not the blatant attempt to make this movie more Star Wars like.)
It's also exactly like the ice covered Rura Penthe in ST:VI, right down to a similar looking (but bigger) white furred sabretoothed snow beast. Rura Penthe was actually in a different part of the script that was deleted from the final film, so it's clearly known to the screenwriters

Apart from that, it's also exactly like Andor, the first description of the Breen homeworld (before Weyoun described it as tropical - possibly misinformation by the Breen to the Dominion), Exo III (pre-Star wars), Rigel X, Psi 2000 (pre-Star Wars), that planet Voyager crashed on, and countless other ice planets from science fiction that long predate Star Wars, which in no way has the monopoly on cliched single environment planets with breathable atmospheres.

That scene of Spock being provoked into showing emotion was weakly done. I'm surprised how little it took Spock to lose it. The intense emotion shown by Spock had ruined what it means to be a vulcan for me. Before you argue that Spock had just lost his planet and is due for an emotional outburst. Perhaps that is true, but the fact that Old Spock told Kirk the young Spock would lose it, this ruined all surprise and the intensity of the moment...
This is completely subjective of course, just like your opinion, but I found that scene extremely well-done and acted and it did not in any way ruin Vulcans for me. People seem to have this impression that Vulcans don't lose their cool. Remember the Vulcan that lost his shipmates in the Dominion War and went all psycho killer in DS9 'Field of Fire'? Remember when Spock reverted to his primitive Vulcan self because of the mating drive's blood fever in 'Amok Time'? Vulcans had to adopt such strict emotional controls specifically because their emotions were so much more powerful and dangerous than even those of humans.

Truth be told, given what Spock went through that day and Kirk's actions and comments toward him (even if noble in purpose), Spock's reaction seemed perfectly understandable. Though taking it to near murder was over the line, but not inconsistent with either his Vulcan or Human heritage. A Kirk beat-down was definitely warranted though.

I certainly don't get your "I'm surprised how little it took Spock to lose it" comment. How could what he went through in that one horrific day be considered "little" by any rational metric? He was remarkably composed both during and after and recovered quickly from his emotional outburst after Sarek gave him the pep talk.

Coupled with the blinding lens flare that made me look away during the entire exchange to avoid blindness. Perhaps the lens flare did serve a purpose, was it to cover up the bad acting? Like how a MC covers up the mistakes of a DJ spinning on a turntable?
The lens flares didn't cover up any acting or distract me from what was going on, and I find that complaint a little silly, but I'll grant that it was extremely overdone.

The last comment made by Scotty “I like this ship, its exciting!” demoted Scotty from a miracle worker and a great engineer to a mere comic relief al-la Jar Jar Binks.
"Aye, and if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon!"

I can't believe that you've seen TOS or the movies or heard Scotty's many trademark catchphrases and think that that was somehow out of character for him or anywhere near Jar-Jar level bad.

Plus, again, while it's subjective, unlike Jar-Jar which produced mostly groans and winces in anyone over the age of ten from what I saw, Scotty's line got big laughs from the overhwelmingly adult audiences in my screenings.

Only thing chekov was good at was a bad accent. (Oh and they did throw him a bone by giving him some transporter duties). Chekov was more than an accent, but they did not show it in this movie.
Umm, not only was Chekov acknowledged as a genius wiz-kid and was a serving officer at 17, he was the only one who could save Kirk and Sulu in mid-air on the transporter with some fancy calculations, he came up with the Titan plan to get within transporter range of the Narada without being detected, and he was the one best qualified to interpret the signals from Vulcan. I say he performed quite admirably in the film, to borrow a phrase from Spock. Oh, and he was put in charge of making shipwide mission broadcasts (for comedic effect, but still) and given the conn on two separate occasions I might add. Hardly an insignificant or underutilized role, and I don't see how you could have seen the film and come away with that impression.

My post was too long, so I'll continue in the next one...
 
Last edited:
Continued...

Scotty has a borderline eating disorder, rather than being a member of AA. (Too much cliché)
What are you even talking about? You're really stretching now. Being on a remote outpost living on nothing but rations for months and asking for a sandwich or a decent meal in only one scene in the entire film means you have a "borderline eating disorder" now? Give me a break.

Sulu bringing a knife to a gun fight. Nuff said.
It's possible his phaser was knocked out of its holster when his parachute veered off course after being shot and he crashed into the rig (or he had it in his hand ready to fire when the Romulans came out and then dropped it in the crash). Kirk was armed with a phaser, so it seems reasonable that Sulu would have one as well. I would agree that it would seem silly for him to only have a sword, but the close quarters nature of the battle on the rig might make that more practical than under normal circumstances.

Red matter red matter, what does it matter? The whole thing about the red matter is just too over the top. For a science fiction movie to introduce something as huge as red matter without any explanations just proves the point that this movie is not a scifi by any means. (This red matter required me to lobotomize myself to begin the "suspension of disbelief)
Genesis Device
Trilithium
Thalaron Radiation
The Nexus
Anti-Time
Baku Reverse-Aging, Eye-Repairing, Boob-Lifting Planetary Ring Radiation

Shall I go on with Trek? Because there's plenty more where Red Matter came from. Expand into other scifi perhaps?

I hear the Force is caused by mitochondria now (pardon me, midichlorians), so it was great that they tried to explain what was just fine for 20 years as a mystical energy field with some BS technobabble instead of just saying "Anakin is the strongest Force user I've ever seen," isn't it? Some things are so implausible that it's best to just leave them as a plot device and not try and explain what is essentially unexplainable in any rational way, because you're only digging the hole even deeper. More technobabble was exactly what people were railing against in Voyager, wasn't it? You want more?

The scene when Kirk fired on Nero at the end of the battle. Were they trying to go with the anti hero for kirk to fire on a helpless ship? If so the build up of kirk from the rest of the movie didn’t add up.
The ship was already known to have passed through the same black hole/wormhole anomaly once before. Now, it was trapped inside it this time, but Kirk didn't know for sure that the Narada would be completely destroyed, he just hoped so. So he had to finish the job.

If he was a bad person, why make the point of him offering to render assistance? Spock wasn't the only one who had lost people to Nero. Kirk lost his father, many of his friends and schoolmates, and most likely his "girlfriend" (sort of). He was also probably pretty pissed off about Vulcan too, and the attempted attack on Earth. I thought it showed remarkable strength of character for him to offer to save Nero and his crew after all of that, but when Nero refused, he had to make sure the threat was neutralized.

Kirk being promoted to captain...Nuff said.
Picard jumped up a few steps to become captain at a young age during battle. Kirk was an officer as a cadet in the prime universe and a captain a few years later. Trilla Scott was a very young captain. Saavik was put in command as a cadet a couple times. Kirk's rise was meteoric, I'll grant you that, but that was done for the sake of dramatic expediency and to get everything in its proper place by the end of the film. I'm willing to suspend my disbelief quite a bit for the sake of advancing the plot.

And lets not forget about the corvette scene. That had all be discussed in the Nemesis thread which was closed due to immaturity on the part of the cheerleaders.
What about it? Yeah, the kid was rebelling against his abusive uncle and making a cry for help to his Starfleet mom who left him there. He was also pissed about his dead father and was acting out for attention.

It was an ultimately unecessary scene, but not completely unprecendented pre-teen or early teen rebelliousness.

Calling people cheerleaders and immature certainly doesn't get your point across in a reasonable way or make people take you seriously.

So far, your attempt so show that the cheerleaders of this film have more than just 1 liners to boast about their movie, have been proven with numerous 1 liners posted on this thread. While the only concrete post is your original post and a negative review of this film.

I rest my case.
I think I've rebutted your points in quite an in-depth manner and without "cheerleading" in any way. It's a silly complaint to expect every subsequent poster in a topic to go into the ridiculous level of detail in their responses that I did though.

And saying "I rest my case" when plenty of people have given extensive opinions on the film across multiple topics is obnoxious. Improve your level of debate and perhaps you'll get better replies.


Edit:

One liners are good. Brevity is the soul of wit. And verbosity=/=correct.

This had to come right before the post where I wrote 'War and Peace' on here, didn't it? :lol:
 
This had to come right before the post where I wrote 'War and Peace' on here, didn't it? :lol:

You get a free pass for a fighting the good fight, my brotha.

:bolian:

Besides, if he says long winded windbaggery is the only acceptable rebutall, you just gave him the be all, end all of "in your face".

Kudos.
 
Robauian kickassery
33415_formatted_welldone30f.gif
 
And the "Sulu bringing a knife to a gun fight", bladed weapons, usual combat and/or survival knives are standard gear for servicemembers in the field. And a sword that can collapse to a compactible state, why not?
 
All the actors were well cast. In fact, the characters were the best thing about this film. That is why it was too bad they weren't given more attention.I thought Chekov, McCoy, Kirk, Spock and Amanda did an excellent job capturing the mannerisms and essence of their original counterparts. Uhura felt a little different but I liked that she had spunk and sass. I didn't particularly care for the Spock/Uhura romance. Granted we didn't see a great deal of it but it certainly didn't strike me as something I'd really care to see again--so in that regard it is pretty much on par with the other romances Trek attempted. Scotty was a little over-the-top for my tastes. Pegg was just so one-note.

You forgot one!

Nurse Chapell (sp)

In the original series, she was pretty much a regular, but in this movie all she gets is a passing comment? Wow, that's gotta stink.

:eek:
 
And the "Sulu bringing a knife to a gun fight", bladed weapons, usual combat and/or survival knives are standard gear for servicemembers in the field. And a sword that can collapse to a compactible state, why not?

Plus, the most important reason of all: a folding Katana is friggin' badass and that scene was awesome. Sulu busting off his helmet and striking a pose got some of the biggest cheers in the movie, which, when you get right down to it, is what they're going for far more than plausibility.

Maybe Sulu never learned about "the Chicago way." ;)
 
Exactly. Let us disabuse ourselves of the notion that Trek is too good to be cool every now and then.

:cool:
 
All the actors were well cast. In fact, the characters were the best thing about this film. That is why it was too bad they weren't given more attention.I thought Chekov, McCoy, Kirk, Spock and Amanda did an excellent job capturing the mannerisms and essence of their original counterparts. Uhura felt a little different but I liked that she had spunk and sass. I didn't particularly care for the Spock/Uhura romance. Granted we didn't see a great deal of it but it certainly didn't strike me as something I'd really care to see again--so in that regard it is pretty much on par with the other romances Trek attempted. Scotty was a little over-the-top for my tastes. Pegg was just so one-note.

You forgot one!

Nurse Chapell (sp)

In the original series, she was pretty much a regular, but in this movie all she gets is a passing comment? Wow, that's gotta stink.

:eek:

yes but she got to give voice to the computer. that oughta make up for it somewhat ;)
 
What I really like about it is it's TOS. It's more TOS than the films with the actual TOS cast!

Seriously, the films with Shatner, Nimoy et all, TMP to TUC, they aren't a whole lot like the series. They have their moments, sure, but they aren't TOS.

This was TOS on the big screen. As it should be!

I can see why TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT fans may not like it though, but them's the breaks.

I am as much a fan of "Berman Trek" as I am of "Classic Trek", and I loved the new movie.

I could go on at length too, but I will say this: it was well written.
 
The overly comical handling of kirk's allergy (otherwise it would of been a nicely nugget from TWOH). The popeye hands is just too over the top, it didn’t fit into the rest of humour. It made the whole movie seem more galaxy quest like.

Since that never happened in 'Galaxy Quest' and Trek is no stranger to oddball humor like that, I don't really see your point, other than as a rather poor attempt to paint this film as being overly derivative of others, which you do again later with equally slim justifications.

Oh, and abnormally swollen hands are a not uncommon physiological reaction to a number of medical issues, from kidney failure, Lupus (sorry, Dr. House), spider bites, or to allergies like Kirk had to the fictional vaccine in the film.



Your justification: “it never happened in Galaxy Quest” can be easily refuted by “it never happened just like that in Trek either.” And if you are suggesting that the old Trek’s human is somehow on par with Galaxy Quest humour, then I must have my humour detector adjusted. I realize humour is subjective, but if you are attempting to draw parallels between Kirk’s hand and say a medical condition. These
kirkhands1.jpg
kirkhand2.jpg

hands are obviously larger, therefore over the top.

Was it a goofy scene? Sure, intentionally so, but it got pretty decent and ongoing laughs from the audiences at both the screenings I saw as the scene progressed through the numb-tongue and Uhura's shocked reaction, so it's hard to call the scene too over-the-top to fail at being humorous.
I never said over-the-top humour does not deserve a laugh or 2. If this Nu-Trek is meant to be a comedy, then it has succeeded in the endeavour.
Cadets running the ship don’t bother me, it’s been done in TWOH, but never a whole fleet of cadets had been send into action. It seems that they mobilized the entire academy. Were all the regular officers dead? The whole fleet was send away seems a little too convenient.
It’s like the US navy sending out their entire cadets in Annapolis to face a threat in the sea of Japan, while the entire 7th fleet was called away to deal with some unnamed middle east situation.
Even in that unlikely scenario the 7th fleet or a detachment of it would be called back to deal with the situation rather than sending out a fleet load of cadets.
I thought it was made pretty clear by the film that the Laurentian System must be quite a distance away from the Federation core worlds, since no ships could arrive from there in time to deal with either the Vulcan or Earth attacks (not even with the seemingly faster warp speeds evident in the film).
Where was it mentioned that the Laurentian System is quite a distance away? Here is a direct quote from the movie that mentioned the system.
“We received a distress call from Vulcan. With our primary fleet engaged in the Laurentian system, I hereby order ALL cadets to report to hanger 1 immediately, dismissed.”
Notice ALL cadets was order to duty, including first year plebs. It’s like Annapolis allowing their first year cadets to serve abort an active warship. I’m sorry it just does not happen.
It wasn't a "whole fleet of cadets" as there were clearly existing officers serving aboard those ships, even on the Enterprise which hadn't been christened yet and thus likely had a smaller crew than most and needed more cadets.
If you are suggesting that the cadets are only a minority portion of the fleet. I see no evidence of that.
The numerous cadets were probably added primarily to assist in planetwide emergency responses on Vulcan; evacuation, first aid, and marshaling/relocation of refugees, since at that point Starfleet only thought it was massive seismic disturbances of some sort. Academy cadets from the various armed forces in the present day do often assist with emergencies and disaster relief. The cadets were probably also assigned in such great numbers to gain some real world experience in the field.
Again nowhere in the real would any plebe would be assigned to active duty onboard a warship, rescue mission or not. And if it is a rescue mission requiring evacuation of Vulcan, then shouldn’t freighter, transports, the merchant fleet, be also include in the rescue fleet? 7 star ships just isn’t enough to evacuate a planet.

It's certainly not unprecedented in Trek for cadets to serve on active duty, as in TWoK which you mentioned, Nog serving aboard the Defiant, and Red Squad being assigned missions at the Academy (albeit in a coup attempt) and aboard the Valiant.
All those precedence you mentioned only include senior cadets. They serve their term as a work study in senior year before graduation. Nowhere does that include first, second, third year cadets.
The whole fleet wasn't away, and this was one of the few times (First Contact being another) where Earth actually had a decent defense fleet of its own for a change. Well, before it was completely destroyed at Vulcan by Nero, at least.
By saying “the whole fleet wasn’t away” are you saying that the whole fleet of officers, crew isn’t away? Cause it seems that the ships were only docked at earth without any crew aboard, thus needing the entire academy to fill those positions. So the whole fleet is away, minus a few empty ships.
So for the entire fleet being called away to the Laurentian(sp) system does seem a bit convenient. A better approach would be to have it said the fleet was called away to the Deveron(sp) system a little nod to TNG. (Although still very contrived, but I would be willing to forgive it due to the TNG nod.)
The Devron System is in the Romulan Neutral Zone. Thus meaning that the Federation would definitely be at war with the Romulans if they had an entire fleet "engaged" there, and making it seem odd that Pike would be surprised that the Romulans might be potential adversaries at Vulcan when mentioned by Kirk.
Engaged does not mean war, there could be a giant standoff between the federation and the romulans while they stare into the anomaly created by Picard. And if Nero did alter time during the encounters with Kelvin, who is to say that there wouldn’t be war. But that would mean the writers had to put alot more thought into this plot, a wishful thinking on my part.
I fail to see how changing the name of the system makes it any better or different than what the Laurentian System was in the film, a plot device to separate the bulk of the fleet from Earth and Vulcan, thus requiring the presence of the ships at the space station and the use of the cadets. As such, it served better than the overused "The Enterprise is the only ship in range" line from numerous episodes and films, even though the ship would often travel numerous light years in said films and episodes, thus making it highly unlikely that Starfleet didn't have any other ships around (or no civilian vessels for that matter). At least here they provided something of a plausible explanation and didn't leave the Enterprise alone at first.
Changing the name of the system does not matter to the average audience, I doubt most of the viewers would even know the significance of Devron system. What I am trying to say is that, by posing this little nugget to the trek fans. Most of us would be so wrapped up into thinking possible scenarios, and how this could and could not happen, imagine all the discussions that would ensue. This would cause anyone to forget the obvious use of ”the plot device to separate the bulk of the fleet from Earth and Vulcan”, as you put it. Again, this is wishful thinking on my part, hoping the writers to be so thoughtful.
 
CONT.

Uhura being the only person that can speak romulan. (it seems like a gimmick to give uhura some ability). Before you go into saying how it’s an improvement over the line “open hailing frequencies”. I would say it’s been done before-Enterprise: Sato, and the audience of today would expect a communication officer actually being able to communicate. That gimmick of giving Uhura something to do serves no purpose. Uhura told the captain the romulans are attacking. And what did pike do? He still warped into the system and got his ass kicked. Only when Nero saw that it was the enterprise, he stopped attacking.
Just because the Enterprise's current communications officer couldn't differentiate Romulan from Vulcan doesn't make him incompetent, as he could be fluent in other equally important languages (like Klingon, who were possibly who the Federation was at war with in the Laurentian System and were definitely a threat as early as the Kelvin incident judging by Starfleet's concern about them being involved). Uhura wasn't fluent in Klingon in ST:VI, so this actually kind of plays off that in the way. It makes sense for her to be assigned as a backup comms officer fluent in Romulan if the chief comms officer was fluent in other languages.
I wasn’t talking about the current communication officer. I should apologize and clarify the line
“and the audience of today would expect a communication officer actually being able to communicate.”
That was directed towards Uhura, today’s audience expects Uhura to be fluent in languages. By today’s standard it is no longer acceptable for Uhura to simply say “open hailing frequencies”. As for Uhura being fluent in romulan, that had no impact on the outcome what so ever. To quote from the movie,
Uhura: “Sir I’ve pick up no romulan transmission, or transmission of any kind in the area.”
Even if the regular comm officer didn’t speak romulan, atleast he could tell the difference between romulan transmission and no transmission. Unless it is what you suggested, he is incompetent. So if you analysis the scene Uhura made no contribution, making the whole scene unnecessary and redundant.
As far as Pike warping into the Vulcan system and not dropping out of warp sooner to avoid a trap, which is a frequent complaint I have read; he didn't know the condition of the fleet yet. As far as he knew, they were engaged in battle and needed backup as soon as possible. He'd look like a real douche if he dropped out of warp early while more ships were destroyed, which he could have possibly prevented. He had no way of knowing they had already been completely wiped out.
That is not my complain, my complain is Uhura’s presence did not alter the outcome, thus making her unnecessary.
Now if Uhura never comes aboard. Pike warps into the system, gets his ass kicked. Nero stops because it’s the enterprise. Uhura made no contribution at all, they only gave her that nonsense about lighting storms just so that it doesn’t seem blantenly obivous, she's there just for sex appeal.
The only other part Uhura plays is to kiss spock.
They raised their shields because of Uhura's confirmation of Kirk's report, which allowed the ship to survive the first volley of torpedoes (Sulu said: "shields at 32%" & "we can't survive another hit like that") which otherwise would have destroyed them outright like they did the rest of the fleet if they were unshielded. Nero would never have had the chance to recognize it as the Enterprise then.
There is a full minute of screen time between the instance Enterprise dropped out of warp and Nero firing on it. And Pike even had time to order(quote from movie): “divert auxiliary power from port nacelle to forward shields.” This diversion of power is what saved the Enterprise from being destroyed outright. Not Uhura.
Uhura's primary role in relation to the other characters was that of dramatic and comedic foil to Kirk early on, and later as a pillar of emotional support for Spock, to show his inner conflict when he could not. She was the model rule-abiding and confident/competent but humble cadet as opposed to Kirk's rebellious and arrogant nature, and she rebuffed him more than once because of those qualities which she did not respect.
That’s stretching it. Uhura’s early rebuff of Kirk was just to show that Kirk is a womanizer which we all know. And she served her purpose in that little strip show of hers. As for being an emotional support for Spock and showed his inner conflict when Spock can not, this movie had made it perfectly clear, the Nu-Spock had no problems showing his emotions what so ever.
The overall brashness of Kirk bothered me, he seemed more like a over spoiled brat that I want to bent over and spank, than a captain you would respect. You could argue the old Kirk is just as brash, but never to this degree. This nu-kirk seems to flaunt in the face of all rules, and it is an appeal to the rebellion spirit of teenagers. This is what this movie seems to be catered towards.
Kirk's frequent actions or reputation in TOS, TMP, TWoK, TSfS, Trials & Tribblations, Flashback, and numerous other examples would seem to disagree. He was somewhat less arrogant than he was here, but then he was also much more wise and experienced by that point. I saw nothing in the movie that didn't strike me as being fairly consistent with an earlier version of the character we all know, albeit in a slightly different form due to different life experiences.
If you are saying that Kirk should act like that because he is young, and he lost his father. I agree, but that does not mean that I have to like this version of Kirk. Which brings me back to my original point, because I am not a teenager, and this Kirk is targeted towards that demographic, this came to mind.
KIRK_IS_A_JERK.jpg


Spock's completely disregard for kirk's safety by ejecting him out of an escape pod. In what universe is that even considered acceptable for any commanding officer? Does Spock not realize that Kirk could die? (As it is shown how dangerous the planet is in the later scenes.) What surprised me is for Mccoy actually going along with it, after bending all the rules to get Kirk on board the Enterprise. This is shown in the scene where Spock actually thanking Mccoy for his support in sending Kirk to his death. All that bullshit Spock was spewing about breaking a stallion, do they not realize Kirk could die? This also made Spock seem petty and vindictive. If you argue that this is the new direction the writers want to take Spock, then I say thanks but no thanks.
Though the scene made it seem as if Kirk was immediately ejected for comedic effect, I'm assuming that Spock didn't just set him down on a planet with a Federation outpost nearby at random, and that they looked it up first and provided Kirk with cold weather gear. Spock may not have known about the local wildlife however. There was certainly no indication that they thought they were sending Kirk "to his death," and the escape pod's computer told him about the Starfleet outpost nearby.
So are we to play fill in the blank for the lack of explanation on the part of the movie? Ok I’ll go along with that. So sending Kirk to that planet was a punishment, he is meant to suffer. Well that just shows how petty spock is. And you are suggesting Spock did some research and know Kirk would be rescued? Well from what the movie showed, there seem to be only 2 starfleet officers on that outpost, Scotty and that Ewok. They are not equipped to mount a search and rescue, and Spock surely know that.
 
cont.

While simply throwing Kirk in the brig would have been more kosher to regulations, simpler, and would have made more sense plotwise, Spock truly was "emotionally compromised" by the destruction of his homeworld, so he should not be expected to act completely rationally. Plus, while Kirk was right in declaring that pursuing the Narada was the only viable option, he went about it in completely the wrong way by calling Spock out in front of the crew. Spock was an untested commander, the crew had just experienced a massive defeat and the loss of their captain, and here you have Kirk undermining Spock on the bridge, which is dangerous for morale in that tenuous situation. He could have possibly even led a mutiny for all Spock knew of this guy from knowing him just that one day.
:lol: are you seriously saying that with a straight face? Mutiny? :lol: ok so are we to believe an emotionally compromised Spock would act like a Klingon when his command is challenged? Is this the USS Enterprise or the IKS Enterprise? Spock should of pull out his d'k tahg and kill Kirk on the spot.
As far as McCoy's "support" for Spock, I believe that was referring to where McCoy urged Kirk not to fight the security officers taking him to the brig or confining him to quarters at first, not to his being stranded on Delta Vega, which McCoy was clearly bothered by.
No I’m referring to this quote from Spock: “I am aware that James Kirk is a friend of yours. I recognize supporting me as you did must be difficult” That was directed towards Mccoy, which suggests Mccoy supports the action of sending Kirk to that icy planet. Has the whole crew gone mad? Oh wait this is the IKS Enterprise.
When Kirk was being attacked by that spider like creature, it is so reminiscent of the planet Hoth in star wars, I jokingly expected kirk to pull out a lightsaber. (I can forgive convenience but not the blatant attempt to make this movie more Star Wars like.)[/QUOTE]
It's also exactly like the ice covered Rura Penthe in ST:VI, right down to a similar looking (but bigger) white furred sabretoothed snow beast. Rura Penthe was actually in a different part of the script that was deleted from the final film, so it's clearly known to the screenwriters[/QUOTE]
Known to the writers, but not shown... hmm But that is not even the point, what makes it Star Wars like is not only that it seems like Skywalker on Hoth, and all its missing is a couple of Tauntauns. It is also because that first Kirk encounters a polar bear, just like Qui Gon Jinn encounters a giant fish in phantom menace. And then a bigger spider comes and knocks off the bear goes for kirk, just like a bigger sea monster comes around eats the fish goes after Qui Gon. There is just too much similarities.
That scene of Spock being provoked into showing emotion was weakly done. I'm surprised how little it took Spock to lose it. The intense emotion shown by Spock had ruined what it means to be a vulcan for me. Before you argue that Spock had just lost his planet and is due for an emotional outburst. Perhaps that is true, but the fact that Old Spock told Kirk the young Spock would lose it, this ruined all surprise and the intensity of the moment...[/QUOTE]
This is completely subjective of course, just like your opinion, but I found that scene extremely well-done and acted and it did not in any way ruin Vulcans for me. People seem to have this impression that Vulcans don't lose their cool. Remember the Vulcan that lost his shipmates in the Dominion War and went all psycho killer in DS9 'Field of Fire'? Remember when Spock reverted to his primitive Vulcan self because of the mating drive's blood fever in 'Amok Time'? Vulcans had to adopt such strict emotional controls specifically because their emotions were so much more powerful and dangerous than even those of humans.
Truth be told, given what Spock went through that day and Kirk's actions and comments toward him (even if noble in purpose), Spock's reaction seemed perfectly understandable. Though taking it to near murder was over the line, but not inconsistent with either his Vulcan or Human heritage. A Kirk beat-down was definitely warranted though.[/QUOTE]
As you said this is subjective I grant you the point that Vulcans do lose it sometimes. It just seem unspock like when he loses, but many have pointed out, this is a new time line. And perhaps the blinding light directed my eyes to look away and missed the intensity of the scene. This is entirely possible. And now thinking back I do enjoy the Kirk beat down, I’ve been wanting to do it myself ever since the kobayashi maru test.
 
cont.

The last comment made by Scotty “I like this ship, its exciting!” demoted Scotty from a miracle worker and a great engineer to a mere comic relief al-la Jar Jar Binks.[/QUOTE]
"Aye, and if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon!"[/QUOTE]
While that sounded like Scotty, this Scotty sounded way too sarcastic and cheerful. The old Scotty always sounded a bit grumpy. “Ay, my haggis is in the fire for sure”. You can argue that Scotty grow to be grumpy as he gets older, sure I’ll buy that. But, having Scotty swimming through the water tubes, and “hafe they gut sandwiches”, just sounds like “me sir so hungry”.
I can't believe that you've seen TOS or the movies or heard Scotty's many trademark catchphrases and think that that was somehow out of character for him or anywhere near Jar-Jar level bad.
In TOS and movies Scotty was never used as comic relief, while he did tell a few jokes. It is the difference of laughing with him vs laughing at him. Laughing at him made him seem Jar Jar like.
Only thing chekov was good at was a bad accent. (Oh and they did throw him a bone by giving him some transporter duties). Chekov was more than an accent, but they did not show it in this movie.
Umm, not only was Chekov acknowledged as a genius wiz-kid and was a serving officer at 17, he was the only one who could save Kirk and Sulu in mid-air on the transporter with some fancy calculations, he came up with the Titan plan to get within transporter range of the Narada without being detected,
Walter Koenig had an accent, but he was comprehensible. That accent did not sounded like it was making fun of Russians. While Anton Yelchin is completely inaudible. That whole plan he came up with, did not catch a single word.
and he was the one best qualified to interpret the signals from Vulcan.
have no idea what you are talking about with that one.

I say he performed quite admirably in the film, to borrow a phrase from Spock. Oh, and he was put in charge of making shipwide mission broadcasts (for comedic effect, but still) and given the conn on two separate occasions I might add. Hardly an insignificant or underutilized role, and I don't see how you could have seen the film and come away with that impression.
Yes his having way too much fun with that accent. Does he not realize the stereotype it portrays? If he wasn’t born Russian, people would be yelling racist.

Scotty has a borderline eating disorder, rather than being a member of AA. (Too much cliché)
What are you even talking about? You're really stretching now. Being on a remote outpost living on nothing but rations for months and asking for a sandwich or a decent meal in only one scene in the entire film means you have a "borderline eating disorder" now? Give me a break.
How many screen time did Scotty get? The majority of screen time was the initial meeting on the outpost. And during the entire time he was talking about food. So if you don’t know who Scotty was before the movie, you would come away with the impressing he is all about food!
Sulu bringing a knife to a gun fight. Nuff said.
It's possible his phaser was knocked out of its holster when his parachute veered off course after being shot and he crashed into the rig (or he had it in his hand ready to fire when the Romulans came out and then dropped it in the crash). Kirk was armed with a phaser, so it seems reasonable that Sulu would have one as well. I would agree that it would seem silly for him to only have a sword, but the close quarters nature of the battle on the rig might make that more practical than under normal circumstances.
More practical to use a katana? So the marine of today should forego their closet quarter fire training for fencing lessons? Just because Sulu is known for fencing, does not mean all Asians are kungfu fighting. Just because John Cho looks Japanese, does not mean he carries a katana. For Abrams to even employ such stereotypical clichés, its borderline racism.
 
Red matter red matter, what does it matter? The whole thing about the red matter is just too over the top. For a science fiction movie to introduce something as huge as red matter without any explanations just proves the point that this movie is not a scifi by any means. (This red matter required me to lobotomize myself to begin the "suspension of disbelief)
Genesis Device
Trilithium
Thalaron Radiation
The Nexus
Anti-Time
Baku Reverse-Aging, Eye-Repairing, Boob-Lifting Planetary Ring Radiation
Shall I go on with Trek? Because there's plenty more where Red Matter came from. Expand into other scifi perhaps?
I hear the Force is caused by mitochondria now (pardon me, midichlorians), so it was great that they tried to explain what was just fine for 20 years as a mystical energy field with some BS technobabble instead of just saying "Anakin is the strongest Force user I've ever seen," isn't it? Some things are so implausible that it's best to just leave them as a plot device and not try and explain what is essentially unexplainable in any rational way, because you're only digging the hole even deeper. More technobabble was exactly what people were railing against in Voyager, wasn't it? You want more?
I’m not asking for a long explanation of its molecular composition. I’m asking for anything even a 1 liners will do. Anything to explain away that nagging question in my head, what the fuck is that giant red jello ball? It does not have to be smart it does not have to make sense, all it needs to do is ease my brain into a sense of belief.
The scene when Kirk fired on Nero at the end of the battle. Were they trying to go with the anti hero for kirk to fire on a helpless ship? If so the build up of kirk from the rest of the movie didn’t add up.
The ship was already known to have passed through the same black hole/wormhole anomaly once before. Now, it was trapped inside it this time, but Kirk didn't know for sure that the Narada would be completely destroyed, he just hoped so. So he had to finish the job.
I can’t believe you are pushing that lame excuse. Lets put aside the fact that if the ship pass through the wormhole it would be a different universe and will not affect Kirk and all that Abram BS. The wormhole was clearing shown opening up with in the ship, and not outside of it. How does a ship survive after being pulled inside out? And it is clearly shown on screen that the ship is breaking apart.
If he was a bad person, why make the point of him offering to render assistance? Spock wasn't the only one who had lost people to Nero. Kirk lost his father, many of his friends and schoolmates, and most likely his "girlfriend" (sort of). He was also probably pretty pissed off about Vulcan too, and the attempted attack on Earth. I thought it showed remarkable strength of character for him to offer to save Nero and his crew after all of that, but when Nero refused, he had to make sure the threat was neutralized.
That is my point, the writers obviously didn’t intent on going with the anti hero angle. And yet the offer to help did not seem genuine. Unlike the old kirk’s in TOS, when the romulans was first introduced, Kirk defeated the warbird, that offered to help is genuine. As for this Nu-kirk he just seems to be going through with the motions, and he is almost happy when Nero didn’t want his help. And just casually said oh yeah lets blow him away.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top