• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bunch of new covers, plus a blurb for That Which Divides

Dayton has posted about the cover of That Which divides on his blog:

It was brought to my attention earlier today that Simon & Schuster has updated their online catalogues with several new book covers, including a handful for upcoming Star Trek titles. Among the new additions is this VERY MUCH NOT FINAL cover for our forthcoming novel, That Which Divides.

The reason I know it's not the final cover is because I saw this image a couple of weeks ago, and was asked for my input. I provided feedback based on info from the actual manuscript, which the cover artist didn't have at the time he created this interim image. He was working from some pretty basic info provided to him by my editor, and given what he had to work with, this is actually a pretty slick image. My feedback was aimed more at tweaking the image to bring it in line with the events from the manuscript this is supposed to depict, and to "juice it up" some. I'm still waiting (and excited) to see what he brings with the next go-around.
 
I'm not too keen on the Rise Like Lions cover. I actually preferred the earlier cover with Martok and Dukat on it, although I guess Picard is to be a major character in the novel.
 
I'm not too keen on the Rise Like Lions cover. I actually preferred the earlier cover with Martok and Dukat on it, although I guess Picard is to be a major character in the novel.
Just a shame they used a flipped image of him again so that his face looks all wonky.

.
 
Just a shame they used a flipped image of him again so that his face looks all wonky.
I've sent a heads-up to S&S, and the editor says they'll see if it can still be fixed. It might not be possible if it's too far along, but we'll do what we can.
 
DorkBoy [TM];5194478 said:
I like the "Rings of Time" cover too. I don't think its a concept drawing, it just looks like they were going for a "60s sci-fi cover art" vibe. Back in the 60s and 70s, and a little bit in the 80s, a lot of sci-fi books had covers like these. Hand painted spaceships, often stylized with blurry watercolor edges, and very bulbous like the Enterprise is depicted here.

There was a famous painter named John Berkey who used to do that sort of thing; it was a very distinctive art style. (He may not be the only one who did them, I'm not sure.) I remember when he did the box art for the video game Star Control 3 and I felt like I was stepping back through time to my childhood just looking at it.

Anyhow, it reminds me of the covers of the sci-fi books I used to read as a kid. Fits with the title, too - I keep thinking "old school sci fi" when I read it - "The Rings of Time." :)

This sums up my reaction to this cover perfectly. I can see why it might not sit well with some people, but I absolutely love it, and I hope it does become the final cover.
 
Those all look great - although it looks a lot like someone has left some margin indicators on the Forgotten History cover. And the cover of Storming Heaven suggests things are not going to end well for Starbase 47-Vanguard...

Well it is being written by David "Destroyer of Worlds" Mack.
 
I like the newer versions of both covers. RoT now looks even cooler, but TWD is still a bit meh. I like covers that are somewhat descriptive of the books.
 
Note that there have been a few changes made to those covers already:


Maybe I'm missing something. The link you have takes me to the same cover I saw the when this thread first started. To me it looks just as abstract as before. As near as I can tell, it's the same exact cover.

I did notice the changes to the That Which Divides cover though.

 
Note that there have been a few changes made to those covers already:


Maybe I'm missing something. The link you have takes me to the same cover I saw the when this thread first started. To me it looks just as abstract as before. As near as I can tell, it's the same exact cover.

I did notice the changes to the That Which Divides cover though.


Hmm. Something must have gone wrong for you. I tried that link and got a much more photo-realistic version of the scene . . .
 
Maybe I'm missing something. The link you have takes me to the same cover I saw the when this thread first started. To me it looks just as abstract as before. As near as I can tell, it's the same exact cover.

I did notice the changes to the That Which Divides cover though.

I had that, just had to clear my cache, and pah-zam there are the new versions.
 
Just a shame they used a flipped image of him again so that his face looks all wonky.
I've sent a heads-up to S&S, and the editor says they'll see if it can still be fixed. It might not be possible if it's too far along, but we'll do what we can.
Quick update: it's been fixed, though they might not have updated the one in the catalog yet. But the final version has been corrected. Thanks for the heads-up — we caught it in the nick of time! :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top