Given how 'Star Trek: Voyager' turned out - not too disappointed with this announcement.
Given how 'Star Trek: Voyager' turned out - not too disappointed with this announcement.
Given how 'Star Trek: Voyager' turned out - not too disappointed with this announcement.
But before one minute of footage is even shot? Before the lead actress is even cast?Do all the "we're so f*cked" people know how many times showrunners change? This is not a huge deal. Yeah, I'd like Fuller to run the show too. But it ain't the end of the world.
I enjoy the movies for what they are, but that feeling is not what needs to be done on TV and in the Prime timeline. They are two separate worlds for a good reason.
I would have liked to see them get Manny Coto back. He did a very good job with ENT Seasons 3 & 4 - and it would have been interesting to see his take on a Star trek series set in TOS era (IMO).I'd have been more interested in Ron Moore doing the job because nuBSG was such a different take on that material. More than anything I'd prefer a successful writer/producer who likes Star Trek but had not worked on it before. Fuller was intriguing for the many good things he's done since Voyager ended.
Indeed. Kurtzman is also no stranger to TV, which means he will know how to work within their schedules and considerations.Kurtzman has already proven his Trek chops to me with the Abrams films. This isn't the first rodeo for many of the folks involved. The show will be fine. The only way it won't is if the concept is weak.
But before one minute of footage is even shot? Before the lead actress is even cast?
It could still turn out great. But my confidence level in the project has dropped a tick.
Exactly. I'm not excited over Discovery but I was open to giving it a chance. But, there is this constant drumbeat of doom and gloom that seems so overblown that it makes me wonder were the expectation level is at.There's a reasonable explanation to it happening. Fuller is busy.
Since day one I've been cautiously optimistic about it leaning more cautious. That has not changed one iota. Not for the better. Not for the worse. Why not? Because we still no next to nothing about the show. For me this is as big of a deal as Sulu being gay in Beyond. In other words, not one at all!
People just seriously need to calm down. Maybe Discovery will fail after season one. Maybe it will be the best series ever. Maybe it will be something in betweeen. Maybe it will never air. But at the end of the day, it really is just a TV show. Bryan Fuller not being a show runner on the newest incarnation of Star Trek will not play a big part in the world's greater events.
I see costs ranging from 6 - 8 mil per episode for GoT.
Discovery, at $9 million, is tied with Sense8 for the most expensive tv show ever made.
If anyone wondered if CBS really had faith in it and how much they'd support it, there's your answer.
This should probably be quoted at least once per page
What did you say? I wasn't paying attention"Please sign my petition to force CBS to bring back zombie Gene Roddenberry as showrunner."
From the looks of it, that won't help either as no one is bothering to read any of the posts before theirs.
"Please sign my petition to force CBS to bring back zombie Gene Roddenberry as showrunner."
Fuller was a junior writer at the time treated very shabbily on VOY. Using his episodes of that show as a barometer for his quality output is a little unfair, placing all of the blame for VOY on him is absolutely ridiculous.Given how 'Star Trek: Voyager' turned out - not too disappointed with this announcement.
Yeah. Obviously, they should be using a clone.As soon as they hired him, fans would start complaining.
Please see the response to Goldsman's hiring for a reasonable responseFuller was a junior writer at the time treated very shabbily on VOY. Using his episodes of that show as a barometer for his quality output is a little unfair, placing all of the blame for VOY on him is absolutely ridiculous.
Yeah. Obviously, they should be using a clone.
It should be the first clone, from the seventeenth series.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.