• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

bridge lighting in Generations

I said undersung. Not unsung. He gets love, but not enough given his design philosophy basically created what Star Trek looked like for almost 20 straight years.
Personally, I actually like his design work for the TOS films (IV-VI) better than his 24th century design work.
 
The sleek Okudagram and all-touchscreen Enterprise-A bridges will always be superior to the weird mishmash of touchscreens and recording studio switches and faders that was in TUC.
That was unrestrained Nick Meyer again. I have said many times that I think Meyer needed to be balanced out by someone like Harve Bennett who kept some of his ideas in check and had more respect for the source material.
 
The TFF bridge is actually my all-time favorite bridge. I thought it was a perfect transition point between the TOS/TMP bridge and the TNG bridge. I wish Meyer hadn't changed it for TUC.
It's a good transition point, it's just that they're in different centuries so maybe it's not time for that yet.
 
BTW, the bridge lighting on the only Trek film GR made was extremely dim and submarine-like.
Well, yeah, but that really was Wise's call.

There was a rumor at the time, and I heard it from various sources in the decade following, that the studio wanted the D destroyed due to royalty payments to Andrew Probert. In other words, it was a cost-saving move for future films. As far as I know, it's been debunked, and I think Probert has denied it.
Yeah, art staff get paid to do the work and that's it. No residuals.
@Mudd's right. It's all work-for-hire stuff. None of those production guys get points or residuals.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top