• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BREAKING: Official Fan Film Guidelines Issued

The fan film community needed to self police... and instead they stood by and did nothing.

Yeah, please explain how exactly the fan film community was supposed to prevent Alec from doing what he did. From what I understand, people were raising concerns about Axanar well before the lawsuit dropped and he just brushed them off.
 
^ And just who, exactly, in the fan film community was in a position to stop him? Calling him out would've accomplished... what, exactly? From what I've seen/heard of him, Peters isn't the kind of guy to take a hint. Even the Acme safe dropped on your head kind of hint.
This came instantly to mind. Who was in a position to tell AP to cool it? And if someone had tried it I can easily see AP bragging about other productions being afraid of his competition.

If CBS' C&D and even lawsuit couldn't get AP to cool it I don't see how any fanfilm producer could have done it.

While I believe CBS/F has full right to exercise their defence and control of IP I still think they could have humiliated AP without cutting everyone else off at the knees who had been playing nice.


The guidelines were always there, unspoken: don't make too much noise and don't profit. Those were far simpler guidelines than exist now. Any reasonable person--which includes the vast majority of fanfilm makers--could easily understand what lines not to cross.

Eveidently AP thinks rules are for anyone else and he alone has the right to ignore whatever rules he wishes.
 
^ And just who, exactly, in the fan film community was in a position to stop him? Calling him out would've accomplished... what, exactly? From what I've seen/heard of him, Peters isn't the kind of guy to take a hint. Even the Acme safe dropped on your head kind of hint.
For want of a nail...
 
I don't know which is worse: the lop-sided way the hosts on the video presented the story, or all the idiotic comments posted in reply.

Oh God, I only made it through 45 seconds of that. "Opinion" pieces masquerading as news irks me to no end "Don't care if it's MSNBC or FOX....I'm always not sure if frustrated more with the programs themselves or the people who treat it like it's a legitimate objective news source.
 
[/QUOTE]
For want of a nail...

That completely fails to answer the question about how you think Axanar was supposed to have been stopped before all this happened. What, was someone supposed to nail Alec to a tree or something?
 
Seems Peters could learn a thing or two from Cawley and Mignogna about publicly handling adversity.

Have we heard anything from Cawley about the new rules yet? I've been looking around but haven't found anything. I'm sure I'm not the only one who is wondering how NV is taking the news.
 
So another question, does this mean that sound effects can not be used or recreated? Nit picky but valid. Thinking of things like the red alert sounds or computer beeps or phasers / photons etc.
 
Yeah, please explain how exactly the fan film community was supposed to prevent Alec from doing what he did.
Why?

The answer to that question is in the answer to the more important one... exactly how did Peters get into a position where he could cause all this?

If you know that answer, there are any number of points where Peters' influence could have been effectively neutered to where he could never have made a malignant production of the level that would have triggered CBS/Paramount.

But lets be honest... you aren't looking for an answer from me, any answer I give you'll fight. So what you really want is a fight, not answers. I'm not interested in a fight, so there really isn't anything left to say.
 
I agree with you, @Shaw, though I kind of see it from both sides. The best plan I can think of would be to go to CBS in such a case, and let them know what's going on. Of course, speaking out in the open would be fine, too. I get that one doesn't really wish to attack other fan productions, but when one guy is wielding a proverbial gun and waving it around in every other production's face, everyone needs to speak up and tell them to knock it off. Now, it would be difficult with someone like Alec, who clearly has no concept of shame, but at the very least your public displeasure would be noted and seen by other fans. Another plus to that would be not having people working on other fan productions getting involved with the producer of the offending film. That won't stop them from continuing, but they won't be getting any support from the fan production community, and that goes a long way.

Still, at the end of the day, regardless of whether or not anyone's words would have made a difference, Axanar fucked it up for everyone, and of course they're blaming everyone else. When that kind of delusion takes hold, getting through to them is nigh on impossible.
 
Why?


But lets be honest... you aren't looking for an answer from me, any answer I give you'll fight. So what you really want is a fight, not answers. I'm not interested in a fight, so there really isn't anything left to say.

Wow, Shaw, you clearly know all about me and what I'm thinking. I'm not trying to get mixed up in any drama here, but I honestly don't see what other fan productions could have been expected to do to stop Axanar before it got out of hand and the fact that you refuse to back up your claim makes me think you don't know either.
 
What about the use of music? Where does that fall into it? Many of the fan films use the scores from the various TV Series and films (interchangeably and often very very badly spotted and edited - drives me nuts). With the music you have to consider CBS/Paramount and whomever holds the rights, such as Intrada or LaLa Land Records (and so on and so forth). Licensing music is expensive and I was always surprised the larger fan films got away with their use.
I would think the rule about clips from Star Trek not being used could also cover the music usage.

Neil
 
You know, Rocket-Dave does bring up a valid point. Nobody could have stopped Alec Peters. Christian Gossett tried, and he was a friend on the inside of the project. If Peters wouldn't listen to him, how can you have expected him to listen to anyone on the outside?

Alec Peters made the decision to play chicken with a train and didn't know when to step off the tracks.
 
Last edited:
Star Trek novelist Peter David chimes in on the guidelines. Basically, we're damn lucky.

So thanks mostly to the efforts of the “Axanar” people, the guys who raised a million bucks to produce a “Star Trek” based film which resulted in a lawsuit, Paramount has now issued specific guidelines for anyone who wants to make a Trek fan film. And naturally fans are unhappy about it.

My response?

You guys are damned lucky.

When I was producing a “Star Trek” fanzine back in the 1970s, Paramount issued a decree: No one could write “Star Trek” fanfic. It was copyright infringement, plain and simple, and not to be allowed. At one convention I attended, Paramount lawyers actually came into the dealer’s room and confiscated peoples’ fanzines from right off their tables.

The fact that they loosened up to the degree that they have should be something fan filmmakers should feel damned grateful for. You want to make fan films about space adventures but you don’t like the Paramount decrees? Fine. Create your own damned characters and universe and do whatever the hell you want. You own the copyright and have the ability to tell any kind of story for however long you want. That’s my advice. Otherwise live with it.

PAD
 
On one hand I'm glad there are guidelines now, but on the other hand some of these are a little overboard IMHO.

"The fan production must be family friendly and suitable for public presentation. Videos must not include profanity, nudity, obscenity, pornography, depictions of drugs, alcohol, tobacco, or any harmful or illegal activity,"

I mean Star Trek itself has "violated" a few of these!!!
All of them, actually. And I notice that "obscenity" and "illegal activity" are really vague terms that could be twisted however they choose.

For example, one of the fan films has same-sex marriage as part of the plot. Some people consider that obscene (yes, I know it's legal in the US now, but that hasn't changed some peoples' opinions).

Yes, and I'm fine with that, because it's their property, and they don't want to deal with the headache of a fan production doing something that could come back against them. For example, show a child actor getting drunk in a fan production, and who gets to feel the heat from that? CBS/P, because all people will see is the giant STAR TREK in the title. This makes perfect sense for CBS/P.
Hmm. I don't remember... is tranya an alcoholic drink? The reason I mention this is because the actor who played Balok in "The Corbomite Maneuver" was only about 6 or 7 years old. No, Balok didn't get drunk, but it was still a child actor playing a character drinking a beverage presumably meant for adults.

Every Warner Bros. cartoon is 8 minutes or less. You get character intro, rivalry, conflict, resolution, and a crap ton of jokes all in that tiny amount of time. Hell, one of my favorite Dr. Who stories is the one where Paul McGann becomes the war Doctor and that's 6:48 seconds.
Night of the Doctor was a lot longer than 6.48 seconds.

I've just been wondering if these guidelines would have to be applied to fan fiction as well. They do reference them as fan productions and not just fan film.
They could shut down fanfic sites if they really wanted to. As mentioned, they could even raid the dealers' room at a convention. Or they could prohibit people from selling print 'zines on eBay.

But they can't prevent people from writing stories or poems, drawing pictures, and showing them to friends, any more than Marion Zimmer Bradley's estate could swoop in and confiscate any Darkover material sitting in my desk drawer (the order came down that if anyone has such material at home, we were to either destroy it immediately, or rewrite it so that it couldn't possibly be identified as a Darkover story).

If I were to write a Star Trek story for next month's NaNoWriMo entry, there's not a damn thing anyone can do to stop me... because NaNo entries are not posted on that site, nor are they even read by anyone who runs the site. Some people post excerpts of their stories, but that's not something I ever do.

As Peter David said, lawyers could raid a convention dealers' room. But due to sheer impossible logistics, they can't raid the private collections of fans on (at least) three continents, or police what people write for their own amusement and never post anywhere.

That said, most fanfic writers understand that they have to post disclaimers saying that they don't own Star Trek, its characters, and have no intention of trying to profit from what they've written. Reputable fanfic archive sites are quite stern in that regard.
 
Re: PAD. Blah blah blah...yes, it's CBS/P's call as to what can be allowed, and we should all kiss their feet that they allow anything at all. What they decree to be okay changes over the years. In the '70s they confiscated fanzines, in the '90s they shut down fansites. Doesn't mean we can't lament a little over the valley we're sliding into right now.

...This too shall pass.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top