• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BREAKING: Official Fan Film Guidelines Issued

What the guidelines don't cover are semi-professional fan films.

There's no such thing.

I hope CBS/Paramount will also open up a channel of communication that would allow them to vet and approve semi-pro productions.

This is it. There are two kinds of Trek films - those produced by the studios that own Star Trek, and fan films. Period, full stop.
 
This is exactly how I interpret it as well.
Me too - they are refusing to give tacit acknowledgement or support to the bootleg costume market - hardly surprising as there exists an official licencee. They don't say the production can't make their own stuff, though.
 
You're forgetting one thing. As the owners of Star Trek, Paramount and CBS get to make the rules. If they don't want this kind of content in fan films they can make that rule. Neil

I never said anything otherwise. I just think it's hilarious.
 
The disclaimer on the bottom clearly reads that CBS will choose to selectively non-enforce their copyrights for anyone who follows these guidelines, and enforcement is at the sole discretion of CBS and subject to change at any time. So if STC and NV continue to toe the line, finish their stories and close up shop; it's possible that CBS will continue to look the other way.

Or CBS could say "In light of the fact that we did not have explicit guidelines before now, as a good faith gesture we will not automatically object to productions that have wrapped shooting on an episode releasing that episode in non-physical form only."

Not saying it'll happen, but they certainly could do it if they wanted to.

I very much doubt either NV or STC or anyone else will be allowed to do anything new, but it would be a nice gesture to let them release something they are mostly done with.
 
Here's another way to look at it.. Fan films that meet all these restrictions basically get automatic approval from CBS/Paramount.

What the guidelines don't cover are semi-professional fan films. I hope CBS/Paramount will also open up a channel of communication that would allow them to vet and approve semi-pro productions.
The guidelines explicitly ban 'semi professional' outfits. Amateurs only and no star trek veterans.
 
Here's another way to look at it.. Fan films that meet all these restrictions basically get automatic approval from CBS/Paramount.

What the guidelines don't cover are semi-professional fan films. I hope CBS/Paramount will also open up a channel of communication that would allow them to vet and approve semi-pro productions.
The point is that they are not supposed to be professional at all; the guidelines even specifically use the term "amateur".
 
xLW9qdx.gif

It's ok. I'm in my refrigerator.

For those that are upset about the restrictions, it's better than what you can do with a Star Wars fan film.
I think these are all fair. Because, as has been stated, they coulda just said no more.

And I think the best is: no one gets paid for any work on it. These should be fan films, done for the love, not money.

Maybe people will take their time and skill and make original stuff. That would be the best thing out of this.
 
George Takei was never paid for his work on "Yorktown: A Time to Heal", but he was obviously an official Star Trek actor. This new rule of not using any Star Trek alumni pretty much kills any chance of "Yorktown" getting finished now. We were planning on releasing the short film in December of 2016.
 
**Pokes head in**

No death threats guys.
Yup. 9gs: that was too far, buddy.

We're all disgusted by the actions of AP and their unfortunate consequences. But I don't want the dude to die. I just want him to leave Star Trek alone and stop swindling people out of their money.
 
Fucking ouch!!!

The fan production must be a real “fan” production, i.e., creators, actors and all other participants must be amateurs, cannot be compensated for their services, and cannot be currently or previously employed on any Star Trek series, films, production of DVDs or with any of CBS or Paramount Pictures’ licensees.

What will Richard Hatch do for a living now?!?
 
I suspect this will change very little except for outlandish cases such as Axanar. Poeple will do what they want, and Paramount will only chase them if they make too much noise.

I also think a ban on "profanity" it hilarious, because real-Trek uses profanity all the time. (One suspects they mean extreme profanity, such as f-bombs, but that's not actually what the guidelines say.)

As I noted above, Trek has also depicted alcohol aplenty, and occasional drugs and smoking, but those things are now forbidden in the fan films. CBS/Paramount are allowed to have some "edginess" in official Trek, but they don't want fan films to approach those boundaries, apparently. Heaven forbid an unofficial production feature any controversial content.

Kor
 
While we're wishing, I'd like a pony.
I'd like for rules #1 and 3 to be rescinded. Not that it was likely I'd ever get finished, but #3 kills off any chance I'll ever finish my "Doomsday Machine" project.

Eat a dick, Alec Peters. (Whoops, I just violated rule #7! :p )
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCR
Honestly, I think the rules are very fair. The fact is that fan films had gotten completely out of control. At the point where you have an actual film studio raise money, hire professionals and produce multi-episode series with the Star Trek name in it, you are essentially producing a real Star Trek show, not a fan film anymore.
 
As I noted above, Trek has also depicted alcohol aplenty, and occasional drugs and smoking, but those things are now forbidden in the fan films. CBS/Paramount are allowed to have some "edginess" in official Trek, but they don't want fan films to approach those boundaries, apparently. Heaven forbid an unofficial production feature any controversial content.

Kor

It's their playground, THEY get to make the rules. They don't someone making something controversial that has blow back on THEM. If CBS/Paramount make something controversial then at least they are in control of that.

It makes total sense.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top