Now that's an interesting bit of perspective.
I think one inner truth of the series is that Walter can't see Junior as an adequate vessel for his hopes for immortality in his descendants' memories. Junior is flawed, so flawed that he ruined his father's life. If the series never addresses this I think it would be a gigantic artistic failure for the project as a whole.
It was initially about his family, but only until the Grey Matter offer, at which point it became solely about ego.Then why didn't he just take the money from the Gray Matter people instead of all this? If he truly cared about his family in any kind of objective way, he, being an intelligent man like he is, would have to know that becoming a meth cook would endanger them more than just swallowing his pride & taking some charityI've seen it coming since even before he was working with Fring. It was never about the family. It was about HIS family. He was a peon nothing of a loser who was going to die of cancer, & leave his family with nothing to reflect HIS influence
Eh, I don't really buy that. Clearly ego always played a big part, but I also think early on he DID sincerely care about and want to provide for the family.
It's obvious in his interactions with Junior all through the series.
He just got way too greedy and power-hungry, and let his ego get the better of him.
I didn't say he never cared about them. I said that all this business was never about them, & if he does or did ever care about them, he does/did so a great deal less than he cares about himself
If it's written & presented well, it holds as much merit as any alternative, because this isn't a mob show or a serial killer show. We don't & didn't necessarily have to assume the character is flawed to their evil ways as you would in the Sopranos or Dexter, but it is true that the evil ways are chosen & willfully so. So a righteous ending could hold as much water as the badass guy gets away with it one, because the truth is... Walt isn't a bad ass. He's a pathetic man, whose been cloaking it in badassery ever since he blew up Tuco's place. You're a bad ass if you pull that stunt when you don't have cancer. Someone with a death sentence inviting that kind of death is just patheticThe ambiguity of the phrase "breaking bad" is built into the show as it has been written. Breaking morally, going bad is one meaning. The other meaning is that a put-upon guy is heroically fighting bad. The show has played a little fast and loose making Walter really badass, and selling the fun of seeing Walter win. Making him lose may actually be more realistic but is realism and moral honesty what the audience really wants?
It really does paint a picture of how much illness, disability & infirmity play a role on this show, highlighting throughout this ever brutal world, that human life is really exceedingly fragileRan across this on Junior: http://sistermagpie.livejournal.com/206293.html
I think what drove Walt to kill Mike was Mike once again seeing through his bullshit and refusing to submit to his authority as the Man, and some jealousy over Mike having Jesse's loyalty which Walt feels should be his and his alone.
...
I'll miss you, Mike. You were a true badass. ...
So--would Walter pull the trigger on Jesse to save his own neck?
The latest ep reminded me that there's one little thing that bugs me about this show, and I hate to mention it since I haven't looked forward to new shows this eagerly since The Wire. But they use gimmicky shots. Last night it was the POV of the hand opening the safe deposit boxes. A few episodes ago it was an upward shot through a table and a map which had somehow become transparent. Hitchcock always said the camera should be placed so the viewer feels they could see what it's seeing, it subconsciously draws them in. Every time they use a shot like that it takes me out of things a little. It seems like a gimmick that the show doesn't need. But that's small beer...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.