• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BOYCOTT THIS FILM!!!

I have alreay left this forum.

I haven't been posting here for quite some time.


well, I killed myself in protest over the boycotting the boycott's boycott.

I've been dead for seven hours in order to boycott the boycott of the boycott's boycotting boycott boycott boycott boyco
I was already dead before this boycotting process began. I killed myself in anticipation of all this boycotting, creamated myself, buried my own urn next to a tree in my own backyard where my ashes are seeping into the groundwater as we speak.

I bow before your superior boycott boycottiness.
 
The guy who created Felicity is directing it. That's pretty much all the reason I need.

Well, the guy who directed Nashville and the film M*A*S*H also directed episodes of Bonanza, Hawaiian Eye and Route 66 early in his career, but I don't hold that against him.

I would like to add this to my own post:

Even though Felicity was not my 'cup of tea' (interest-wise), there is no denying that it was a well-done and crisply-written TV show.

Then allow me to elaborate:

I thought Felicity was tweeny soap opera drek.

Furthermore, I thought Alias was a cheap knockoff of a decent spy show (La Femme Nikita), I think Lost is moronic (Polar bears on a frigging tropical island???), I would rather gouge my eyes out than subject myself to MI3 again, and Cloverfield was LAAAAAAAAAAAMMMME. Now, as this man has never produced or directed a single thing in this universe that I've actually found entertaining, I see no reason why I should be jumping for joy that he has been given the reins of a franchise I actually like.

Therefore, boycotting Trek XI? Not an issue for me. Easy call...
 
well, I killed myself in protest over the boycotting the boycott's boycott.

I've been dead for seven hours in order to boycott the boycott of the boycott's boycotting boycott boycott boycott boyco
I was already dead before this boycotting process began. I killed myself in anticipation of all this boycotting, creamated myself, buried my own urn next to a tree in my own backyard where my ashes are seeping into the groundwater as we speak.

I bow before your superior boycott boycottiness.

In fact my mother had me aborted, having forseen that I would become a Star Trek fan and get passionate enough to start boycotting things I care about.



Hey.. I posted in Esperanto and nothing???
 
If Paramout would stop restricting the realase of some very basic information, maybe people woeuld be more enthusiastic.

Of course it is not mandatory (correct spelling by the way :) ). You gotta realize, sometimes information on movies doesn't start until 2-3 months before it even comes out. At least we have a teaser, so we know the movie is for real.[/quote]

I'm 58 and this will be my first ever movie..

And Gee, this forum has a spell check poster included..
 
Just don't get me started on Keri Russell's haircut during Season 2.

If J.J. Abrams can't explain why Khan remembers Felicity's hair being short, even though Khan's appearance was in season one and she didn't cut her hair until season two, I am boycotting this movie!

"But you... I never forget a haircut!" - Khan Noonien Singh
:guffaw:I'm sure the movie tie-in novel will explain everything.
 


I'm fascinated by siegezunt's new avatar, and so desperately want to say something horribly inappropriate... :p

But I'm willing to boycott that as well.
 
The new Kirk should do the Picard maneuver every five minutes...

I assume you mean the tugging on the uniform, and NOT the move he made as Captain of the Stargazer...

I think the New Kirk should create a "Kirk Maneuver" which would entail frequently pulling his trouser material out from between his butt cheeks due the pants being improperly fitted in the seat.

...and then re-master all of TOS (including TOS films) to amend them with a scene showing Shatner doing the Kirk Maneuver.
You are assuming correctly ;) And I agree with your idea. Kirk should have his own maneuvre! :techman:
Ask any hot yeoman... they all know the 'Kirk Maneuver'! It is canon!! :techman:
 
I assume you mean the tugging on the uniform, and NOT the move he made as Captain of the Stargazer...

I think the New Kirk should create a "Kirk Maneuver" which would entail frequently pulling his trouser material out from between his butt cheeks due the pants being improperly fitted in the seat.

...and then re-master all of TOS (including TOS films) to amend them with a scene showing Shatner doing the Kirk Maneuver.
You are assuming correctly ;) And I agree with your idea. Kirk should have his own maneuvre! :techman:
Ask any hot yeoman... they all know the 'Kirk Maneuver'! It is canon!! :techman:
How silly of me. What was I thinking, really? ;)
 
:bolian:I'll boycott if:

The film doesn't have at least one person sitting on a tribble.

It's not in esperanto.

The nacelles don't move or shoot Pez candy

Worf isn't holding the deflector dish in his teeth

Any character struggles with his/her/its sexuality

No one reverses the polarity

and if Denny Crane doesn't defend Kirk at some point from criminal charges.

Other than that, I'm stoked.
 
If I am drunk and stoned for the entire run of the movie and unable to leave the house, I will boycott the movie.
 
I'm boycotting the film if it respects anything resembling canon appears in the film.
I'm also boycotting if there is a palpable lack of Mexican food or headgear.
If Gozer appears, I'll run straight into the movie and void my boycott
 
i will boycott this film...in the Mirror Universe anyway. in this universe i'll treat Trek XI like i did Crystal Skull...i'll buy everything associated with it from ice cream to legos to cereal!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top