• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Borg of Enterprise....

Temporarily, yes. The Borg-infested Earth was the only time that was changed. Eventually, it got changed right back.

Yes, but that would mean the Borg-dominant timeline should have never happened and the crew shouldn't have seen the assimilated Earth. Although at this we might as well just accept what we see, since the alternate future of "Past Tense" should have never been seen either since there was no timeline where Sisko failed.
 
^ No, those 'temporary' timelines were necessary in order that the 'real' timeline should be fulfilled.

It's not like those alt-timelines "never" happened; that's logically impossible. It's just that they did happen, and were later erased. There is a difference.
 
I liked "Regeneration" as a Borg episode even if it made a bad Enterprise episode, but yes it messed up the Star Trek timeline even further than already in Voyager when it was revealed that the Hansens were studying the Borg, or in Generations when it was revealed that the refugees were El Aurians or included them among other species.

Knowledge about a 'lost' or 'mystery' species would be recorded, especially when some sightings have similarities (mysterious cyborg aliens, you don't ignore that quickly).
If the El-Aurians on purpose did not tell the Federation about the Borg Collective it rather speaks a lot about the El-Aurians' mentality (we should not warn the Federation about this civilization of cyborgs that will probably come for it and its people when the Collective realizes that it has technology and resources the Collective can use, the Federation must meet the Borg on its own).

Even Hansen's crackpot theory about some mysterious species traveling through space in large cube shaped vessels would probably end up in some archive, even if it is just some silly idea that can not be confirmed nor denied.
The moment Picard and the Ent-D crew ran into a Borg ship and came back to tell the tale should have might some lights go on (cyborgs? cube shaped vessel? Wasn't there some crackpot scholar who had this theory about a 'Borg Collective', some mystery species that has only been seen at the edges of explored space?)

Section 31 covering it all up? Forcing the El-Aurian refugees to remain quiet for example, why would they?
If anything they would encourage research and investigation into this unknown species as it could clearly be some kind of threat. They would want more information about this species in order to have counter strategies and new weapons be developed for the inevitable day that the Collective would show up.
They would probably hire Hansen through a third party to investigate the Collective, or perhaps even send probes way back on the 22th century in the rough direction of the Delta Quadrant once Archer had send his report of the events of "Regeneration".

No, I honestly think there should not have been a Borg episode in Enterprise (or the Enterprise series to begin with but that is another subject) or any references to the Federation knowing about the Borg Collective before "Q who". (the idea that Guinan and other El-Aurians knew about the Borg but never told anyone is a whole different can of worms)

Perhaps Seven of Nine should have been a Starfleet member or Federation civilian who got assimilated by the Borg after "The best of both worlds."
 
^ No, those 'temporary' timelines were necessary in order that the 'real' timeline should be fulfilled.

It's not like those alt-timelines "never" happened; that's logically impossible. It's just that they did happen, and were later erased. There is a difference.

Nope, at least not for Past Tense. Sisko was never meant to fail, so there should never have been a future where he did. There was no interference from the future that helped him. (edit: the only exception might be that the timeline was created simply because he stayed in the past). FC is more complicated, so I'm just not going to try to make sense of it.
 
^ No, *Sisko* wasn't meant to fail, but the "original" Gabriel Bell (or the person everyone thought was Bell) was always supposed to die so Sisko could take his place. In essence, Sisko was always Bell.
 
To my mind the problem with FC is we simply don't know whether they truly restored the timeline. For it to be perfectly restored would require that everything played out exactly as before, making the actions of the E's crew part of the original timeline, a causality loop. However it is never established beyond doubt that this is the case, all we know is that they return to what they hope is their future. Later movies show them adventuring in what appears to be more or less the familiar prime trek timeline, but how could we, or even they, know for sure.

Our characters are limited by an in universe perspective, millions of things outside of their little bubble could have subtly changed and they would likely never know. The best we can say is that if the timeline wasn't restored, it was pretty close, or any noticeable changes simply went uncommented upon onscreen.
 
To my mind the problem with FC is we simply don't know whether they truly restored the timeline. For it to be perfectly restored would require that everything played out exactly as before, making the actions of the E's crew part of the original timeline, a causality loop.
Sam Carter: Didn't that tape say there were no fish in your pond?
Jack O'Neill: Close enough.

:D
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top