I knew that, but Firespray is ship class, not a name.
I know but it’s also it’s name nowI knew that, but Firespray is ship class, not a name.
That's the class and has been for a long time.So is Slave I now the Firespray or is it a Firespray class ship?
A dark jedi or a gray jedi is as much a Jedi as a dwarf planet is a planet, a guinea pig is a pig, a Welsh rabbit is a rabbit, or vegan cheese is cheese. The fact that the term is, indeed, wrong does not preclude from people using it in-universe.No, it's an oxymoron term that was only created to allow a little extra player creativity and flexibility for custom characters within the framework of the existing rules of the old pen and paper RPG, not actually intended to be a part of the world building. It is an utterly meaningless term, second only to "Grey Jedi" in terms of stupidity.
There's a reason they don't use either in canon media. You're either a member of the Jedi order, or you're not. You're either a Sith, or you're not. You're either a Witch initiated into a Dathomirian Coven, or you're not. You're either a free agent beholden to no organised belief structure or creed but your own, light or dark . . . or you're not. See how this works?
I'll admit, characters like Ahsoka, Ty Yorrick, Ventress and Maul mean that Star Wars could do with a term analogous to "Ronin" for any force wielder trained in the Jedi arts--yes, Sith fall under this too, just ask Qui Gon--wandering the galaxy, beholden to no Order. But for now, they're no such appropriate catch-all term.
. . . but if the 'Visions' novel is any indication, they may have imaginatively gone with "Ronin"!
I mean Lucas did explicitly base Palpatine on Nixon, so . . .There's also the part where the guy gets elected to head office on the grounds he will stop the Bezos and his ilk, only to continue to give all the money people support in secret. Then, a few years down the road, when he refuses to remove himself from office, starts a coup.
Why break the pattern now?Wrong again.
Now now, let's not bring grammar and objective reality into this when we have a false narrative to maintain!It's not called the Firespray. Fett referred to it as "my Firespray gunship." If that were its name, he would have said something like "my gunship, the Firespray," or simply "the Firespray." Firespray is just the name of its class.
No, it's more a case of Disney and/or the toy companies don't think it's wise to plaster that word all over the lego aisle, so they're just dancing around it instead of actually changing it. And in fairness it's probably a wise move.Are some folks really finding the name 'Slave I' offensive?
It's not like Fett is a nice or virtuous person. Makes sense he'd have a nasty name for his ship.
100% False equivalence. "Jedi" is a religious theology, not a zoological classification. When someone leaves the Catholic church for example, we don't suddenly start calling them "Grey Catholics", do we? That'd be dumb. Apostate, or atheist perhaps. But mostly, they're just people who used to be a part of an organization/belief system, and now they're not.A dark jedi or a gray jedi is as much a Jedi as a dwarf planet is a planet, a guinea pig is a pig, a Welsh rabbit is a rabbit, or vegan cheese is cheese. The fact that the term is, indeed, wrong does not preclude from people using it in-universe.
Same difference.100% False equivalence. "Jedi" is a religious theology, not a zoological classification. When someone leaves the Catholic church for example, we don't suddenly start calling them "Grey Catholics", do we? That'd be dumb.
Nope. Different difference.Same difference.
People call non-Amish people with “amish” all the time, because of superficial similarities in clothing or customs, and there's Christian atheism to deal with. Force use will inevitably get people labelled Jedi. I'm sure Motti almost tried to call Vader that.
100% False equivalence. "Jedi" is a religious theology, not a zoological classification. When someone leaves the Catholic church for example, we don't suddenly start calling them "Grey Catholics", do we? That'd be dumb. Apostate, or atheist perhaps. But mostly, they're just people who used to be a part of an organization/belief system, and now they're not.
They might object.... that's possibly the worst example you could've picked. Though I don't think anyone would object to calling Ahsoka a "lapsed Jedi." Kylo Ren was "raised Jedi." Kanen is a "cafeteria Jedi," what with his ignoring the Order's orders on romantic relationships.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.