Tell that to the five appearances in the Roger Moore Bond movies from The Spy Who Loved Me to A View To A Kill and their last appearance in The Living Daylights.The KGB doesn't even appear this often in Bond films.

Tell that to the five appearances in the Roger Moore Bond movies from The Spy Who Loved Me to A View To A Kill and their last appearance in The Living Daylights.The KGB doesn't even appear this often in Bond films.
STOP ANALYZING MY WIDER AND COGENT POINT.![]()
I suppose it could serve as a counter balance to the ideas of exploration and diplomacy. It's whole narrative point is "this isn't how we do things".f the writers come up with a great story that somehow uses Section 31 for exploration and diplomacy,
I suppose it could serve as a counter balance to the ideas of exploration and diplomacy. It's whole narrative point is "this isn't how we do things".
Yep. Variations on a theme. Something Trek does quite (too?) often.But wasn't that what they just did in season one? A whole story about "this isn't how we do things" starting with Burnham's mutiny over the Vulcan Hello.
Yep. Variations on a theme. Something Trek does quite (too?) often.
Or when you binge watch.I think it sticks out a little more when you are doing back-to-back multi-episode arcs dealing with the same themes.
Or when you binge watch.![]()
I was done with B5 in the 90's.I haven't binge-watched TOS in a long while. Probably something I'll do once I'm done with Babylon 5.
Why do post-DS9 writers keep missing the point of '31, anyway?
I was done with B5 in the 90's.![]()
Because they are a very tempting way to introduce 'edginess' and conspiracy storylines into the show while still appearing loyal to its core concepts. DS9 was very good at balancing the idea of a complicated reality (it's easy to be a saint in paradise) with the question of whether good people need bad people on the battlements to keep their naive ideas of peace and harmony safe. If Discovery manages a storyline like that, I'll be quite happy. But post DS9, Section 31 have been instead moustache twirling bad guys with the subtlty of a nuclear bomb, and there has also been a thread (which actually began in DS9 in a slightly more deniable way) of implication that s31 goes right to the top, and is not a small group of devious fanatics but the very framework of the federation. That, I have no interest in at all. I'm the first to point out where we oversell Gene's Vision™ but I don't want all the ideas of an optimistic future to be a facade for a silent government by terror and assassination.Why do post-DS9 writers keep missing the point of '31, anyway?
I don't believe Discovery has outright went against this yet. The badges are weird when it comes to a clandestine organisations to begin with, but can be brushed off – or even explained, maybe the black badge is not a S31 one badge at all,* but a Starfleet one (like Jeffrey tube wiring guys or something), which they use for some reason. The way the recruitment of the Emperor happened may be acceptable, especially in the context of her useful location that they might want exploiting.ENT got it right. Harris operated in the background and sent messages over subspace, only appearing in the shadows and not bringing the entire Klingon Augment plot out into the open for the rest of Earth's government and Starfleet to see.
Brave man.Something I've just started watching. Really enjoying it.
Brave man.
I still can't vent my frustrations enough about Nu-Trek's thirty-one coming complete with evil secret underground lairs (mwahahaha!) like they really are SPECTRE.No badges. No insignia. No operating in broad daylight and speaking about themselves in front of groups of people who have no business knowing about the existence of the organization the way Admiral Marcus did in STID..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.