Actually I think that's 5 TeraWatts....

Actually I think that's 5 TeraWatts....![]()
Okay, so scrap all the ideas save two. How feasible is it to beam energy from space to earth in a usable form? This seems far fetched to me, but if it will one day be a reality than the second idea of building energy collectors in space is also good, just perhaps in a better form.
Can anyone here speak to the possibility of the first idea?
Actually I think that's 5 TeraWatts....![]()
OOps, how about some salt for that foot?
Submarine and surface shiip reactors go up to 500 MW. A reactor that was transportable by aircraft ran at 1.5 MW output and kept one of the Antarctic stations powered for a decade.
So, where are your numbers, Taccy?
My space turbine will go up to 5 million MW.
That's 5 gigawatts. It only takes 1.21 gigawatts to make a Delorean time travel.Seriously, that's an order of magnitude more juice than a commercial nuke plant puts out. Have you ever seen how much waste heat a 500 Mw plant puts out? You'd have to have thousands of acres of radiator to lose that heat. The ISS has 1680 square feet of radiator for it's heat load.
Popular Science has featured articles where all houses would be running on a hydrogen power source before 2010, and said power source would be no larger than a refrigerator.
Guess what --?
What do you mean? Hoverboards are real. Robert Zemeckis says so.
Popular Science has featured articles where all houses would be running on a hydrogen power source before 2010, and said power source would be no larger than a refrigerator.
Guess what --?
I'm still waiting for my damned hoverboard!!!![]()
It's not 2015 yet.I'm still waiting for my damned hoverboard!!!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.