• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Blade Runner! Any Good?

Snick27

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Lets say im in my mid to late 30's and i love Scifi. But i realized ive never seen Blade Runner.

I thought it was that movie Escape from NY. So is it worth getting this movie?

Any why so many versions of it? Should i just watch the final cut and forget the rest?
 
I think it's pretty good. Can't go wrong with the source material (Do Androids Dream of Electronic Sheep?) either.
 
How the hell does a sci-fi fan get to their late 30s without even realising they haven't seen Blade Runner?
 
if you have insomnia and need some sleep, then Bladerunner is a fantastic flick. it is the epitome of overrated crap
 
Try and catch the Broadway musical version -- it's a hoot.

ETA: Seriously, if the final cut doesn't grab your attention in the first 10 minutes, give up as it's obviously not for you.
 
Last edited:
"Blade Runner" is a movie that was heavily influential in science fiction for years after its release. The story is an interesting one and the visuals are stunning even to this day. The mood of the film just grips you and never lets go until the end.

"The Final Cut" would be the version I recommend seeing, but the original with the much derided voice over by Harrison Ford has a sentimental place in my heart since it's the version I grew up with.

All this said, it is NOT a fast paced, action flick. There are action scenes, but they're only part of a much larger tapestry in the story. If you want something that will go by quick, this isn't the flick for you.
 
A few years ago, my girlfriend borrowed it from the library because she said it was a classic and thought we should see it, but I'm fairly sure the real reason was because she had a crush on Han Solo. About halfway through the film, I could hear her snoring, and I thought that was very disrespectful of her towards this classic movie. The next thing I know, I'm being woken up by a high-pitched whine. Turns out that I had fallen asleep shortly after her, and there was some fault on the DVD that caused it to go crazy around the 90 minute mark.

So, yeah... Blade Runner put us both to sleep. :alienblush:

I don't think it's a bad film, and I don't think it's badly paced or anything like that, I just wasn't expecting a film-noir style detective story and I'm not usually interested in that kind of story. I feel that if I watched it again now I'd enjoy it much more, at the very least I'd be able to make it to the end of the movie this time. I just haven't gotten around to watching it again. :shrug:
 
Final cut is indeed the best call, but I'd suggest checking out the other cuts if you really, really enjoy the final one.
 
It's good, watch it. I wouldn't rank it in a top 10 sci-fi movies but I don't find it coma inducing either.

It's just a solid good sci-fi story with Harrison Ford which is a big plus as he does great in the role. Also Edward James Olmos (captain Adama) and Daryl Hannah (hottie from the 80s, "California Mountain Snake" from Kill Bill)
 
Blade Runner is a classic, and is certainly Ridley Scott's best film. But if you're expecting nonstop action tailored to MTV-era attention spans, you're looking in the wrong place. It's a moody, philosophical film noir set in the future, a layered, thought-provoking piece that challenges the viewer and demands multiple viewings. And it's one of the most visually and stylistically influential films in science fiction cinema; its footprints are all over the cultural landscape.

That said, I didn't enjoy the theatrical cut. It wasn't until I finally saw a version without the plodding voiceover that I understood what the film was really about. I think the narration dumbed it down and even changed the meaning of some very important things about the story.


As for the OP's question of why there are so many versions, it's because, as is so often the case in US cinema, the version of the film finally released to theaters was not the one the director wanted. IIRC, the company that put up the completion bond on the film (which went way over schedule and budget) kind of took control of its final editing, or else it was the studio. So we got the voiceovers to "clarify" the story and we got a tighter cut and we got the imposed, thoroughly illogical "happy ending" tacked on. But years later, film scholars and fans discovered an early workprint that was closer to the original intent, and it became well-regarded and somewhat legendary. Additionally there was the network television version with a number of scenes restored, and the international version with some other differences. So there was a growing interest in seeing the film as it was meant to be seen. Eventually we got the "Director's Cut," which wasn't literally that but was pretty close. Now the "Final Cut" really is Scott's personally overseen restoration of the film, not only recutting it the way he wanted but using digital technology to fix some of the production errors (most notably replacing the face of an obvious stuntwoman in a bad wig with the real Joanna Cassidy's face).

So if you only want to see one version of the film, the Final Cut is probably the way to go. The rest are worth tracking down if you're interested enough in the process to explore the variations, but that's more for devoted fans or film students.
 
Yes, it's great! Get the director's cut. I saw the original hack job in the theaters and walked out like :wtf: :wtf: :wtf: I want my money back. :p

Then I got the director's cut (I guess that's also what people refer to as the Final Cut) for Xmas. Wow! It's actually a great movie.

Caveat: slow stuff doesn't bother me as long as the plotline/characters/situation are basically interesting. I also loved Lost. So if a fast pace is a must for you, this probably isn't the movie for me.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top