Guy has a point, certainly. And I'm not Robert Beltran's agent, I can't speak for the Man and am not in any position to be concerned with his best interests. But Fan Films have great potential to lead to embarrassment and there's no cause to invite it. Especially burdened with an already lack-luster career. So, yes, I feel that Renegades is a sort of a step down for Beltran. It's bad enough to be in a proper, cheap movie.
Nevertheless, cheapness has - in very rare instances - benefitted some original productions, in the past. The original TERMATOR, for example was made most decidedly on the cheap. And look at the results: it became internationally famous, well-regarded and influential. But its cheap productions values were not just presented to the audience, raw, as if to say ... "what can you do ... you know?" It wasn't like that.
Unfortunately, Fan Films aren't known for using their limited resources in this way. They bite off more than they can chew, because STAR TREK incorporates too much fantasy design that has to be included. The bridge of the Enterprise, or a similar set, doesn't look like anything you can just dredge up, from somewhere. This becomes such a drain on the budget, I've even seen Fan Films shot on bluescreen, with a still image of an empty Enterprise-D bridge superimposed on it.
The whole thing was shot in this manner. When what they should do is take aspects of STAR TREK that are affordable and can be done extremely well ... and expound upon them. Like Tom Riker's survival years. Or even Khan's survival years after Ceti Alpha 6 exploded. Aspects of STAR TREK that are very self-contained and more easily told. Instead, they try to present Starfleet in action without good resources. Without any resources, actually ...
Nevertheless, cheapness has - in very rare instances - benefitted some original productions, in the past. The original TERMATOR, for example was made most decidedly on the cheap. And look at the results: it became internationally famous, well-regarded and influential. But its cheap productions values were not just presented to the audience, raw, as if to say ... "what can you do ... you know?" It wasn't like that.
Unfortunately, Fan Films aren't known for using their limited resources in this way. They bite off more than they can chew, because STAR TREK incorporates too much fantasy design that has to be included. The bridge of the Enterprise, or a similar set, doesn't look like anything you can just dredge up, from somewhere. This becomes such a drain on the budget, I've even seen Fan Films shot on bluescreen, with a still image of an empty Enterprise-D bridge superimposed on it.
The whole thing was shot in this manner. When what they should do is take aspects of STAR TREK that are affordable and can be done extremely well ... and expound upon them. Like Tom Riker's survival years. Or even Khan's survival years after Ceti Alpha 6 exploded. Aspects of STAR TREK that are very self-contained and more easily told. Instead, they try to present Starfleet in action without good resources. Without any resources, actually ...