I like it. Does that make people who like the current direction Contras of some sort?
I'm reading the book at the moment. I'm about half way through. It's nowhere near as good as Peter David's other work, however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
I'm reading the book at the moment. I'm about half way through. It's nowhere near as good as Peter David's other work, however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
To name two things. It involves a "fan favourite" and a wall, also some gallows humour.
I rather liked it as well, unlike the other relaunch novels, I've read this one twice.
But "Before Dishonour"... eessh. It was painful. When you get lines like "Geordi had never noticed how much the computer voice sounded like Lwaxana TroI" (NUDGE, NUDGE, WINK, WINK READERS, AREN'T I THE FUNNIEZ!?!) you start to lose the will to live.
I loved Before Dishonor! Nobody mentions Spock in this thread -- seeing Spock, Seven, the Planet Eater, the callback to PD's earlier Borg novel,
If they had to increase Spock's size so that he could put a saddle on the Planet Killer and ride it into the fight with the Borg.
If they had to increase Spock's size so that he could put a saddle on the Planet Killer and ride it into the fight with the Borg.
And that's why Dr Keniclius 5 created the giant Spock clone in "The Infinite Vulcan".
If they had to increase Spock's size so that he could put a saddle on the Planet Killer and ride it into the fight with the Borg.
And that's why Dr Keniclius 5 created the giant Spock clone in "The Infinite Vulcan".
Giant Spock Clone uses Planet Killers as birth control![]()
however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
Former editor, Marco Palmieri, used to say (I'm paraphrasing) that he'd rather have ST books come out that polarized the readership into two distinct camps than to release a book that no one had particularly strong feelings about.
This one really fits that first description. Controversy sells books. "Meh" sits on bookshelves.
It this is true, then it is time to bring Janeway back. Her return would certainly polarize the readership, and I guarantee that, if done well, it would fly off the bookshelves.![]()
however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
Former editor, Marco Palmieri, used to say (I'm paraphrasing) that he'd rather have ST books come out that polarized the readership into two distinct camps than to release a book that no one had particularly strong feelings about.
This one really fits that first description. Controversy sells books. "Meh" sits on bookshelves.
It this is true, then it is time to bring Janeway back. Her return would certainly polarize the readership, and I guarantee that, if done well, it would fly off the bookshelves.![]()
Yeah, but the only reason it would polarize readers is because it's a bad idea.however I've found it to be better than all the next generation books that came before it. I'm not sure why people complain about it so much.
Former editor, Marco Palmieri, used to say (I'm paraphrasing) that he'd rather have ST books come out that polarized the readership into two distinct camps than to release a book that no one had particularly strong feelings about.
This one really fits that first description. Controversy sells books. "Meh" sits on bookshelves.
It this is true, then it is time to bring Janeway back. Her return would certainly polarize the readership, and I guarantee that, if done well, it would fly off the bookshelves.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.