You seem to be confused as to what a "blu ray cover" is.Try Black Panther.
*EW magazine cover*
If you visit your local Best Buy, I'm sure you could find an employee to explain it for you.
You seem to be confused as to what a "blu ray cover" is.Try Black Panther.
*EW magazine cover*
The Flag Waver, The Iron Man, and the "Penis Between Us". HahaGiven what people are saying about Wondy on the DVD cover I don't even want to ponder the implications of the positioning of Black Panther on that cover.
You seem to be confused as to what a "blu ray cover" is.
If you visit your local Best Buy, I'm sure you could find an employee to explain it for you.
What? Of course not - I was mocking The Lensman's absurd equation of the false advertising BvS blu ray cover with the fact that the story of CW happened to feature a whole lot of Avengers. He made it seem as though it was some craven and contrived corporate mandate to have all those characters in the movie, despite the fact that, as of the end of AoU, Cap regularly works with and leads those same people.And Black Panther was a bigger player than Sharon Carter, whom you suggested would be on the CACW cover.
Idk, Hawkeye and Ant-Man were kind of shoved into the movie to add to the action scene in the airport. Along with Spider-Man as you stated. Hawkeye was retired and Scott was still a civilian. Everyone else though, was ok.One of the great things about Civil War was that all of the characters (aside from Spider-Man (but he was fun)) had a legitimate reason for being in the story.
What's more. the placement of Black Panther in the photo actually makes a whole lot of sense to the plot of the movie.
Wonder Woman was great, but either give her more motivation for being there, or leave her out.
false advertising BvS blu ray cover
What? Of course not - I was mocking The Lensman's absurd equation of the false advertising BvS blu ray cover with the fact that the story of CW happened to feature a whole lot of Avengers. He made it seem as though it was some craven and contrived corporate mandate to have all those characters in the movie, despite the fact that, as of the end of AoU, Cap regularly works with and leads those same people.![]()
Captain America, Ironman, Bucky and Zemo were the only characters needed to tell that story. The rest could have been easily left out and not taken away from the main storyline.I disagree. I finally saw Civil War yesterday with my son who doesn't follow any internet discussions. He's nine.
I said that it was more of an Avengers film to me. He thought about it for a moment and said, no Daddy--the other super-heroes were in the movie but the story was all about Captain America's decision to help his friend and to go against the United Nations decision. That's why it was a Captain America film and not an Avengers film.
I agree with my son.
Also, we both agree that it was cool to see Spider-Man and Black Panther.
Captain America, Ironman, Bucky and Zemo were the only characters needed to tell that story. The rest could have been easily left out and not taken away from the main storyline.
Captain America, Ironman, Bucky and Zemo were the only characters needed to tell that story. The rest could have been easily left out and not taken away from the main storyline.
Except we DID get the counter identity character to Ant-Man in the film. He became Giant-Man for a few minutes; and people like me who've been into comics since the silver age era - (well I was reading the 1960ies editions in the 1970ies when I was a kid collecting) was wondering if they'd ever work Giant Man into a film story/situation in any meaningful way - and for me Civil War delivered on that in a great way.Idk, Hawkeye and Ant-Man were kind of shoved into the movie to add to the action scene in the airport. Along with Spider-Man as you stated. Hawkeye was retired and Scott was still a civilian. Everyone else though, was ok.
Yeah, but The Lord of the Rings movies were actually... good. There's nothing from BvS and Kingdom of Heaven (another sh*tty movie) which warrants a longer version. Come on the WB is hyping, including their franchise, a house of cards.I can't wait to see the Extended Edition. Just like the LOTR movies I think they're going to be a much stronger product.
I still can't believe they didn't just release this as two movies if they had four hours of footage. You would have doubled your earnings. (Obviously this would have required a different version of the story with two climaxes. End Part One with Batman vs Superman, Part Two with Doomsday.)
Except we DID get the counter identity character to Ant-Man in the film. He became Giant-Man for a few minutes; and people like me who've been into comics since the silver age era - (well I was reading the 1960ies editions in the 1970ies when I was a kid collecting) was wondering if they'd ever work Giant Man into a film story/situation in any meaningful way - and for me Civil War delivered on that in a great way.
There's nothing from... Kingdom of Heaven (another sh*tty movie) which warrants a longer version.
Kingdom of Heaven may not be your cup of tea but to deny the longer version is categorically superior suggests you've not seen it or refused to consider it on its merits. Unlike many "extended" cuts, Kingdom of Heaven is practically a different film altogether.Yeah, but The Lord of the Rings movies were actually... good. There's nothing from BvS and Kingdom of Heaven (another sh*tty movie) which warrants a longer version. Come on the WB is hyping, including their franchise, a house of cards.
Um....I wasn't one of those people complaing about Avengers not appearing in other movies.If anything I consider that a plus. Perhaps you have me confused with another poster?See, this hypocrisy is what gets me. People complain that we should've heard from the other Avengers in Iron Man 3, Thor 2 and Winter Soldier.
Then when that actually HAPPENS in Civil War people complain the Avengers were there!
Just what do you want? This is a Shared Universe where characters do not exist in a vacuum.
What? Of course not - I was mocking The Lensman's absurd equation of the false advertising BvS blu ray cover with the fact that the story of CW happened to feature a whole lot of Avengers. He made it seem as though it was some craven and contrived corporate mandate to have all those characters in the movie, despite the fact that, as of the end of AoU, Cap regularly works with and leads those same people.![]()
I loved Batman vs Superman and can't wait for the extended cut.Yeah, but The Lord of the Rings movies were actually... good. There's nothing from BvS and Kingdom of Heaven (another sh*tty movie) which warrants a longer version. Come on the WB is hyping, including their franchise, a house of cards.
UPD: those wanting to get #BvSUltimateEdition now legally, you can't - WB have taken the early Flixster and CinemaNow streams/downloads down
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.