• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Balance of Terror Questions

Hey, that's no way to talk about the War For Southern Independence. ;)

Praetor, honey, face it: Your side lost. But it was oh, so gallant while doing so. Have a shot of bourbon on me. ;)

Whoa. Brain storm. I can't help but equate the Romulan sundering to the American Civil War, i.e. the Romulans didn't want to do what Surak said they should do, so they left - which makes Stiles' bitterness relating to similar bitterness over the Lost Cause all the more bittersweet, since his Great Enemy went through something 'similar.'

Cool theory. Babaganoosh is correct about "no overt evidence," but I rather like it. I can't imagine it was a friendly "sundering," logic or no. Doesn't Spock somewhere or other refer to ancient Vulcan history as "savage, even by Earth standards."

^ Now I have a mental image of 'Confederates in Space'.

No no no, it's 'Confederates... In... Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!' :)

:guffaw::lol::rommie::guffaw::lol::rommie:

That is exactly, and I do mean exactly, what I thought, right down to the elipses!

OK, so that's a little scary in addition to really funny...

It certainly provides a more fitting explanation for the Sundering, after all the Romulans are the descendants of those who 'marched under the Raptors wings' indicating that there was a ideological civil war on ancient Vulcan.

That was part of my thinking. On the whole though, it almost seems more fitting if the Romulans-to-be went willingly. Of course, this is still workable even if they did leave after a civil war...

Yes - an exodus.

Has anybody besides me read a couple of Ray Bradbury stories that involve all the black peoples of Earth (or at least in the U.S.) emmigrating to Mars? I can't remember the names, but at least one of them is in The Martian Chronicles. Anyway, if the Romulans-to-be saw themselves as an unpopular minority...not bad, not bad at all.

Actually, my old guy at the Shiloh relic shop considered himself an oppressed minority, too, now that I think about it. Which is a little unsettling, really, but it does go to show that oppression is in the eye of the beholder.

Finally before I draw my ramblings to a conclusion I have one question of my own. Is this Lt Stiles the same person who went on to become Captain stiles of the USS Excelsior?

No. The Captain of the Excelsior spelled his name 'Styles' apparently. But there are real-world explanations for this sort of spelling-change that could allow for him to be a relative. ;)

Hambone said:
No. BOT = Lt. Stiles. STIII = Captain Styles. It would have been an interesting homage to the character, though.

Yeah, but Stiles in BOT was such a bigoted jerk. I guess that doesn't mean his decendent has to be, of course.
 
^ Do'h I just failed at basic reading. What a fool I am.:alienblush:

And I would love to see a Cardassianoid offshoot race, perhaps based around the philosophy of the Hebitians? Thus taking an opposite approach to the Vulcan Sundering.
And how about some pacifist Klingons?
 
^ Oh, heck, Thor - I'd bet you just about anything that my last name isn't spelled the same way it was many generations back. So if you want them to be related, why not?

I'd rather they weren't, because of that "bigoted jerk" thing I mentioned earlier...
 
^ Oh, heck, Thor - I'd bet you just about anything that my last name isn't spelled the same way it was many generations back. So if you want them to be related, why not?

I'd rather they weren't, because of that "bigoted jerk" thing I mentioned earlier...

Well, I know for a fact that my (Real) name/Surname is not spelled or pronounced the same way as they were back in the day. Basically my surname is an Anglicisation of an Irish surname and both my first name and middle name come from biblical sources.

I think I made the classic mistake of confusing two very similar surnames besides considering what captain Styles was all about I doubt that he ever served under Kirk. (I do feel ever so slightly foolish now...)
 
^ Aw. You want me to make a big error right now so you'll feel better? I'll bet I could - and without faking anything, either.

My last name is not only certainly anglicized, but it's been changed so much that nobody is quite sure what nationality it was originally. The geneology buff in one branch of the family determined that it's French while the geneology buff in another branch of the family decided it's German. You wouldn't think these would be all that easy to confuse...

But anyway, to get myself back on topic, where does your quote "under the Raptor's wings" come from?
 
^ Do'h I just failed at basic reading. What a fool I am.:alienblush:

And I would love to see a Cardassianoid offshoot race, perhaps based around the philosophy of the Hebitians? Thus taking an opposite approach to the Vulcan Sundering.
And how about some pacifist Klingons?

Oh, don't feel bad. You should see what my Irish surname looked like before it was Anglicanized. (In fact, we may have the same one... :shifty:)

Hey, that's no way to talk about the War For Southern Independence. ;)

Praetor, honey, face it: Your side lost. But it was oh, so gallant while doing so. Have a shot of bourbon on me. ;)

Cute. *grumbles as he signs the treaty* ;)

Whoa. Brain storm. I can't help but equate the Romulan sundering to the American Civil War, i.e. the Romulans didn't want to do what Surak said they should do, so they left - which makes Stiles' bitterness relating to similar bitterness over the Lost Cause all the more bittersweet, since his Great Enemy went through something 'similar.'

Cool theory. Babaganoosh is correct about "no overt evidence," but I rather like it. I can't imagine it was a friendly "sundering," logic or no. Doesn't Spock somewhere or other refer to ancient Vulcan history as "savage, even by Earth standards."

Indeed he does.

Has anybody besides me read a couple of Ray Bradbury stories that involve all the black peoples of Earth (or at least in the U.S.) emmigrating to Mars? I can't remember the names, but at least one of them is in The Martian Chronicles. Anyway, if the Romulans-to-be saw themselves as an unpopular minority...not bad, not bad at all.

That sounds interesting. I haven't heard of that. It does seem to fit.

No. The Captain of the Excelsior spelled his name 'Styles' apparently. But there are real-world explanations for this sort of spelling-change that could allow for him to be a relative. ;)

Hambone said:
No. BOT = Lt. Stiles. STIII = Captain Styles. It would have been an interesting homage to the character, though.

Yeah, but Stiles in BOT was such a bigoted jerk. I guess that doesn't mean his decendent has to be, of course.

Capt. Styles was something of a pompous jerk, though. It may be in the genes after all...

And I would guess 'under the raptor's wings' refers to the Romulan logo, with the two worlds of Romulus and Remus clutched in its grasp. An almost literal reiteration of the Roman myth of Romulus and Remus with 'Confederate' overtones thrown in as the origin for Romulus would be interesting.
 
"Raptor" means "Bird of Prey", doesn't it? It probably just originated as the design of their warships, though I have to wonder if Vulcan (a desert world by this point) had any birds. Must have been from before the ancient wars turned Vulcan into a desert.
 
^ Yes, I know what raptor means - cool word. And I agree it must be in reference to the Warbirds. It's just that I'm pretty sure Thor had a reason to put that phrase in quotes. It's so poetic.
 
^ Oh, I see. That's what I get for not watching ENT very often. Thanks, Brutal.

Ha, so that's where I got it from. And there I was thinking that I had come up with a brilliantly poetic description;).

And Preator, with the surname it would probably depend on what part of the Emerald Isle your family hailed from:shifty:
 
I knew I'd heard it somewhere but I had to Google it to be sure. Not the biggest ENT fan, I must admit--I saw "The Forge" during a holiday marathon on Sci-Fi.
 
No. The Captain of the Excelsior spelled his name 'Styles' apparently. But there are real-world explanations for this sort of spelling-change that could allow for him to be a relative. ;)

Hambone said:
No. BOT = Lt. Stiles. STIII = Captain Styles. It would have been an interesting homage to the character, though.

Yeah, but Stiles in BOT was such a bigoted jerk. I guess that doesn't mean his decendent has to be, of course.

Then again, when were we shown either character's name onscreen (not counting the credits)? How do we "know" they're spelled differently? I suppose it's technically possible they are the same character...
 
Well, I think the script and cast list SHOULD count for a character's name since that most likely where we're going to see it. There aren't many times where we would see their names on a screen or nametag in the episodes or movies.
 
"Raptor" means "Bird of Prey", doesn't it? It probably just originated as the design of their warships, though I have to wonder if Vulcan (a desert world by this point) had any birds. Must have been from before the ancient wars turned Vulcan into a desert.
Condors and vultures and such live in rather arid conditions, and seem to do all right. Vulcan was still able to support humanoids, if marginally--regardless of the cause of the desertification, or whether it occurred nearer to the present or far back in geologic time--so it should still be able to support some animal life.

I always interpreted the "march under the raptors' wings" line as rather poetic--arising from the feast for the carrion birds after the war(s), which in itself may be metaphorical (ala "all that's left will be the cockroaches")

The Romulans might have taken it to heart, like a bunch of Yankee Doodles, or, even more simply, looked to actively hunting raptors as a metaphor for their own greatness and nobility, just as humans often use the form and names of the eagle, falcon, and hawk--even occasionally the owl--as symbols of prowess.

Of course, splitting hairs, in no way would Vulcan have "birds." They would have a completely unrelated class of flying creatures with a likely hemocyanin-based respiration, which just happen have strong morphological similarities to birds, much as pterodactyls, bats, and sparrows have morphological similarities to each other. :p But Vulcan probably continues to have flying life to fill the ecological niche that our own class Aves fills on Earth.

I wonder, do they have birds (or animal life at all) on Romulus? They must have some, for plantlife to be so prevalent. Which means odds of flying animals of some sort.

Interestingly, life that arose on Romulus must be similar enough to Vulcan life to provide fodder for the transplanted Romulans. Is that a stroke of luck, diligence on the Romulans' part for avoiding crappy planets and homing in on ones capable of supporting them (or possibly rebuilding the local ecology to suit their needs), or just more interference from our mysterious first humanoids?
 
Last edited:
I think the Romulans would have taken some terraforming tech with them on their ships. I mean wouldn't they have needed to have traveled in something akin to colony vessels in order to transport a big enough population to properly settle Romulus to begin with?
 
"Raptor" means "Bird of Prey", doesn't it? It probably just originated as the design of their warships, though I have to wonder if Vulcan (a desert world by this point) had any birds. Must have been from before the ancient wars turned Vulcan into a desert.
Condors and vultures and such live in rather arid conditions, and seem to do all right. Vulcan was still able to support humanoids, if marginally--regardless of the cause of the desertification, or whether it occurred nearer to the present or far back in geologic time--so it should still be able to support some animal life.

I always interpreted the "march under the raptors' wings" line as rather poetic--arising from the feast for the carrion birds after the war(s), which in itself may be metaphorical (ala "all that's left will be the cockroaches")

The Romulans might have taken it to heart, like a bunch of Yankee Doodles, or, even more simply, looked to actively hunting raptors as a metaphor for their own greatness and nobility, just as humans often use the form and names of the eagle, falcon, and hawk--even occasionally the owl--as symbols of prowess.

Of course, splitting hairs, in no way would Vulcan have "birds." They would have a completely unrelated class of flying creatures with a likely hemocyanin-based respiration, which just happen have strong morphological similarities to birds, much as pterodactyls, bats, and sparrows have morphological similarities to each other. :p But Vulcan probably continues to have flying life to fill the ecological niche that our own class Aves fills on Earth.

I wonder, do they have birds (or animal life at all) on Romulus? They must have some, for plantlife to be so prevalent. Which means odds of flying animals of some sort.

Interestingly, life that arose on Romulus must be similar enough to Vulcan life to provide fodder for the transplanted Romulans. Is that a stroke of luck, diligence on the Romulans' part for avoiding crappy planets and homing in on ones capable of supporting them (or possibly rebuilding the local ecology to suit their needs), or just more interference from our mysterious first humanoids?

First of all, that's all beautiful. :techman:

Second, I can't help but wonder if Vulcan's civil wars had something to do with it being a barren wasteland in 'modern' times? 'Old' Vulcan might have had birds in the traditional sense, allowing the Romulans to be inspired by more traditional birds as in their logos, which then gave way to vulture/pterodactyl type flying creatures. This might also help explain why Romulans don't seem to be as strong as Vulcans - which could of course be equally explained by Romulus having lower (Earth-type) gravity and the Romulans weakening.

I think the Romulans would have taken some terraforming tech with them on their ships. I mean wouldn't they have needed to have traveled in something akin to colony vessels in order to transport a big enough population to properly settle Romulus to begin with?

That's a good question. I believe Diane Duane said that they left in something like a half-dozen gigantic, slow ark-type ships. I haven't read those books (shame on me) but it would make sense that they would take whatever colonizing technology they needed, and I almost can't help but wonder if they didn't take animal and plant specimens with them to repopulate wherever they ended up settling too? In that sense, perhaps extinct ancient Vulcan animals and plants still lived on Romulus?
 
...You mean the same people who say "We as a species do not lie"? :vulcan:

Regarding Surak/Archer, I wasn't intending to disagree much with you. Instead, I wanted to postulate that whatever remained of Surak was not a "living self", an active self-aware being with a goal of survival, speaking through Archer's vocal cords (a situation which logically would make all Vulcans very eager to reserve an appointment with T'Lar), but merely a collection of phrases and catchy ideas that greatly influenced Archer's behavior. Surak lived on as a particularly vivid meme; any Vulcan would no doubt want to do that, as vanity must be universal, but modern Vulcans have far better ways of creating immortal memes than this arcane toying with their katras. Thus, no lines up the stairs of Mount Seleya.

Perhaps Surak indeed was able to equip his meme with an exceptionally great will to perpetuate/multiply; and perhaps there's a bit of Surak inside every modern Vulcan skull, through a variety of meme transfer methods and not just through fingertip-to-temple katra transfers. The key concern would be that this not be particularly enjoyable or effective eternal life, since it's not observed more commonly. A combination of it requiring a Surak-level superhero and it only offering fragmented and unsatisfactory eternity would be sufficient to do the trick.

Timo Saloniemi

I meant to get to this earlier.

I actually think I like this, that theoretically, a Vulcan could contain and maintain another's whole mind, but that he'd have to be as badass as Surak to do it, and the other person might have to be as wicked as Surak to hold on.

Praetor said:
First of all, that's all beautiful. :techman:
:alienblush: Danke.

Second, I can't help but wonder if Vulcan's civil wars had something to do with it being a barren wasteland in 'modern' times? 'Old' Vulcan might have had birds in the traditional sense, allowing the Romulans to be inspired by more traditional birds as in their logos, which then gave way to vulture/pterodactyl type flying creatures. This might also help explain why Romulans don't seem to be as strong as Vulcans - which could of course be equally explained by Romulus having lower (Earth-type) gravity and the Romulans weakening.
I dunno. I don't think even a really bad nuclear war could actually cause such widespread ecological effects as to desertify a whole planet... I'm one of those who doesn't believe a nuclear war would even spell the end of human civilization, though, and ymmv.

A flare from the supposedly nearby 40 Eridani C might do the trick, which iirc is what Duane posited. I'm not sure how much I like this explanation, since if the flare is capable of burning up a green world, it seems like the ionizing radiation damage to genes is going to be intense. 40 Eridani C's dangerous nature kind of makes me wonder if the 40 Eridani system is really Vulcan's location, Gene Roddenberry or no Gene Roddenberry.

At any rate, I figured continental Vulcan had always been a desert. Heck, I figure this is why the Romulans left--Vulcan is probably the worst place in the galaxy that humanoid life actually evolved on. I sometimes wonder if the Romulans weren't necessarily so ideologically opposed to Surak, but opposed to his (logically flawed) notion that the environment of his planet didn't matter just as long as you had the willpower and grace not to crack someone's skull open for a skin of water...

Of course, thinking on it, it can't be a world totally without carbon dioxide-breathing plant life that frees O2 from water, for the reasons I laid out that Romulus must have aerobic animal life. We know Vulcans metabolize oxygen, so all animal life on Vulcan almost definitely metabolizes oxygen as well. (Even if we do go with the assumption that "Vulcan after the rain" doesn't have birds, they've still got sehlats.) Whence the oxygen cycle? We don't see any plants, but we know there must be plenty.

Beware--below is a semi-coherent tract about the Vulcan ecology and other points of very questionable interest. Anyone who values their time should skip ahead.

At the same time, aerobic or oxygen cycle-supporting photosyntheic biomass on Vulcan is likely to be smaller than on Earth, not just because of crappy conditions, but because of the "thin" atmosphere. Whether this means "thin" as in "less dense" or "thin" as in "less molecular oxygen" is debateable, but no one seemed to develop the bends in Amok Time, just hypoxia. In either case, it does mean less oxygen. (One of the few things they accidentally got right was that a copper-based respiratory pigment can be more efficient than an iron-based one, but this isn't because of the chemistry, but because copper-based pigments don't need to be contained by cells in order for the analogues of kidneys Vulcan animal life must have to filter the blood without jamming up, and hence more molecules can be present in the bloodstream).

Very unfortunately, I'm not a biologist--I wonder if the lack of oxygen in the atmosphere is consonant with an assumption that the reddish hue of Vulcan is the result of a crust binding large amounts of oxygen with iron (as ours is a crust binding large amounts of oxygen with silicon)? I hope so, as an iron oxide surface not only explains the color, but is fully consistent with the fact that Vulcan is a planet with a very high surface gravity (and hence denser than ours). :(

So where are all the Vulcan plants? In the oceans? But there aren't oceans, or, if there are, they're no healthy color... at least for Earth life, they may use different photosynthetic pigment on Vulcan, red perhaps (although since photosynthetic pigments' makeup and color depend on the peak spectrum or spectra photons are emitted in by the life-giving sun, this doesn't, if I'm not mistaken, jive well with a K-class star like 40 Eridani A either!).

Tract over

I think you're right on target about the Romulans adjustment to their (evolutionarily speaking) new world, Praetor. Compared to the Vulcans, the whole species likely suffers from muscular atrophy. They're probably still stronger and built tougher, and no doubt have a greater potential for strength.

Again, below is a section with too much thought devoted to the biology of a fictional planet.

The copper-based blood alone allows significantly greater potential respiratory capacity, although increased capacity means an increased viscosity, which increases workload on the heart. Greater oxidization of glucose also means more waste products, stressing the circulatory system further. And of course more oxygen has to be intaken, requiring more energy expenditure in pulling air in.

All this would, I believe, permit a copper-pigment creature--as correctly but I suspect randomly pointed out in Enterprise in regards to the Andorians, whose blue blood is actually the correct color for a copper-based pigment--to tire more readily in states of extreme exertion than a human, even if the copper-pigment creature can do more before his cardiovascular system reaches its limit.

I have some serious and perhaps unresolvable questions--Does anyone know what would make copper-based blood green? I'm assuming hemocyanin with perhaps some sulfur compound of unknown provenance and purpose, but if there's a respiratory pigment that is both 1)copper-based and 2)green, I'd love to hear about it.
 
Last edited:
Well, I do agree that Vulcan can't be ALL desert, otherwise there's nothing to generate oxygen for the atmosphere (Frank Herbert did his work when he wrote Dune by explaining that the worms created the oxygen and kept the world a desert by moving all the time). But while it's never been explicitly stated in the official media, the general theory is that Vulcan was once a green world like Earth (well, Blue-green) and the wars of the old violent Vulcans made it the way it is now.

There are wackier theories, like that one of the asteroid belts in the system is the REAL Vulcan homeworld which was physically destroyed in one such war and the current one is a second world they all moved to. Perhaps THAT is what led to the schism, the present say Vulcans came to what is now Vulcan while the Romulans just left when the original world went boom.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top