Get Gloria Gaynor to do the theme song."Discoverse"...
Space...the disco inferno. These are the voyages of the Mothership Connection Discovery. Its five-year boogie: To explore strange new dance floors. To seek out new mirrorballs and new polyester civilizations. To boldly groove where no one has grooved before!
"Captain! There is a 50-foot high hump directly in our path."
"Can we evade?"
"Negative, sir. It's so high we can't get over it and so wide we can't get around it."
"Very well. Da Bomb must be deployed immediately. We have no choice but to tear the roof off the sucker."
This means STD is a type of tense Cold War drama with a submarine feel set after ENT and 10 years before TOS, where the nameless main character learns about herself as she advances in rank.
All that and a gay character too?
Wow! This is more dense than The Phantom Menace
I forgot about the robots... Fuller is the new LucasIf the robots say "roger, roger" I'm phoning up the CBS offices...I won't stand for it.
RAMA
If the robots say "roger, roger" I'm phoning up the CBS offices...I won't stand for it.
We have 700 hours of Star Trek taking place over roughly 200 years covering on average a few cubic kilometers (say 100 ) of the universe, plus stray references to events happening elsewhere. Take 700 hrs / 200 yrs + 100 km3/ size of Trek Universe. This back of the envelope calculation shows that the entire Star Trek universe is essentially a vacuum. This series wont fill any gaps, it will just add a little detail. The only way the show would be meaty enough to fill the gaps is if it was high speed Guardian of Forever footage of the trek timeline.If that's the point of the show, or is even a sizable portion of it, I'll be checking out early.
"What do you want to do when you grow up, Johnny?"
"I want to fill in the gaps!"
Some of you guys really need to expand your vocabulary.
As others have pointed out, all he means is that he's going for the same general tone that was found in that episode. Not that the show revolves around the episode or the Romulans or anything other than the feel and style portrayed in Balance of Terror.
I don't think the statement made was about content but about tone.
I had always assumed from interviews and articles back then that Piller was the Teddy bear of the production staff. Not true according to the 50-yr mission Vol2. He had his way through season 3, he was tough on the writers, rewrote them or told them their script sucked, and Spiner is quoted as saying "Piller? Who's that? The guy in the baseball hat?" He never talked the actors and handed the writers their asses if they were caught on set other than when their script was being shot. I was shocked. In some ways he was more tyrannical than Hurley. BUT he also course corrected the shite out of that show. He made it possible for creativity to flourish again which is in no small part why s4 and s5 are some of the show's best.Back story is the laziest, least dramatic and usually least effective approach to characterisation - which is probably why we see it so often and certainly why it dominates in fan fiction. It's a form of exposition.
It's not obvious from later Trek, but Michael Piller particularly disliked "let's bring in someone from one of our characters' pasts" as a way to launch a story.
I could be wrong but Fuller's quote was ""Balance of Terror" is a touchstone for the Discovery story arc". Story arc as an extended or continuing storyline. As in actual narrative arc. As a writer I don't think he chose the very specific phrase "story arc" simply meaning setting or tone.
Fuck you, Rick Berman!This means STD is a type of tense Cold War drama with a submarine feel set after ENT and 10 years before TOS, where the nameless main character learns about herself as she advances in rank.
All that and a gay character too?
Wow! This is more dense than The Phantom Menace
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.