• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Babylon 5

I never really cared for that episode; I just find it forgettable, and that character is one whom I ultimately feel is more significant for the repercussions of what becomes of them than for anything else.
 
The original CGI is definitely showing its age but that's part of its charm.

Physical models used in other shows before CGI became available tend not to age as badly when remastered. The models used on UFO and Space 1999 are probably the best from the pre-CGI era on TV and hold up very well on Blu-ray. However, some of the ships on Blakes 7 always did look like cheap kit bashes - I remember having fun spotting Airfix parts and kitchen utensils. I doubt they'd look better in HD.
With respect to Space 1999 - The better resolution does make it easier to spot when they use the cardboard cutouts (which they did in a number of shots of eagles on the ground on the pad.)
 
Chiggy Von Richthofen.
_Chiggy_von_Richthofen__Screencap_03.jpg


Damn you Fox!
 
If there's ever a series that should be brought or rebooted, it's SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND.

Absolutely loved that show!

(Strangely enough, the Babylon 5 station is in the menu screens. I got the dvd set as soon as it was released, so maybe it's the first print version. Unless all released versions have that error.)
 
If there's ever a series that should be brought or rebooted, it's SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND.
I suppose Disney owns it now too. Which of the Fox's shows, if you had to pick one has better chances of being revived on Disney+? S:AAB or Firefly?
 
I think SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND has a better shot. And for an unusual reason.

The FIREFLY fanbase is massive. But it will also be VERY unforgiving if certain things don't occur.

SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND doesn't have as large a fanbase, so there are liberties that can taken that won't have the backlash a FIREFLY reboot would likely have. Fan backlash, as much as I don't like this to be true, can make or break a show.

And even though a FIREFLY reboot might be a bit more family friendly, I suspect Disney would want to do it so it can show they can do dark material equally well. SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND has everything you can want in a dark world... humans at war with an alien race, AIs that revolted and are still a threat, In Vitro humans that are treated as second class citizens... those three things alone are enough to fuel a dozen seasons worth of stories. Add all the stuff the marines go through, both physical and particularly mental, and you've got a goldmine of a universe to play with.

SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND did get almost 10 episodes more than FIREFLY, but at least they got a movie in addition to a short season to give some kind of closure. We got a rollercoaster of a cliffhanger with the other.
 
Those that have dived into a rewatch on HBO Max, the errors seem to be slowly corrected. For example, "Babylon Squared" and its being cutoff early. The episode ordering.... I am not sure if that will be adjusted or not anytime.
 
Given the troubles Joss Whedon is dealing with lately, I don't think a Firefly reboot is likely currently. It's admittedly also hard for me to imagine such a reboot without his involvement, though...that might be for the best.
 
I hadn't considered his troubles as a factor. Good point.

But if Ben Edlund and Tim Minear could get attached, that would give new life into the prospect.
 
Would they have to involve Whedon in a Firefly reboot?
I think SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND has a better shot. And for an unusual reason.

The FIREFLY fanbase is massive. But it will also be VERY unforgiving if certain things don't occur.

SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND doesn't have as large a fanbase, so there are liberties that can taken that won't have the backlash a FIREFLY reboot would likely have. Fan backlash, as much as I don't like this to be true, can make or break a show.

And even though a FIREFLY reboot might be a bit more family friendly, I suspect Disney would want to do it so it can show they can do dark material equally well. SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND has everything you can want in a dark world... humans at war with an alien race, AIs that revolted and are still a threat, In Vitro humans that are treated as second class citizens... those three things alone are enough to fuel a dozen seasons worth of stories. Add all the stuff the marines go through, both physical and particularly mental, and you've got a goldmine of a universe to play with.

SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND did get almost 10 episodes more than FIREFLY, but at least they got a movie in addition to a short season to give some kind of closure. We got a rollercoaster of a cliffhanger with the other.
Does Space: Above and Beyond have much of a fanbase? I've vaguely heard of it, but that's about it.
 
ABOVE AND BEYOND did get almost 10 episodes more than FIREFLY, but at least they got a movie in addition to a short season to give some kind of closure. We got a rollercoaster of a cliffhanger with the other.

I actually though SAAAB's finale worked fine as a finale, rather than a cliffhanger (not unlike Serenity, or for that matter Angel). Without spoilers, by the end, the main character has been so changed by his experiences that when he finally gets something that he's wanted from the beginning so much that it defined his course for him, it practically doesn't even register. That's a perfect ending for a war story.
 
There are other aspects that make it a cliffhanger. I'll refrain from posting as to not spoil for those who may be interested in watching.

You can message me if you want me to elaborate.
 
That's an interesting view, and it has a lot of merit.

Until now, I didn't see it directly like that, only that BSG took some cues from SPACE.

Good comparison.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top