• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Babylon 5: Sinclair all the way

They had an extremely tight budget and could not go over on anything and so couldn't go into overtime unlike most other shows in production. The entire business model of the show was that everything would be elaborately planned out in advance to avoid that sort of thing.
 
how bad Michael O'Hare, Bruce Boxleitner, Tracy Scroggins, Claudia Christian, Jeff Conaway, Jerry Doyle and co. were.
Sorry man, I can't take you seriously when you say stuff like this.

----

To the original question and some comments - it's not so much that the original outline is a 10-year arc, but a set of two 5-year arcs. The first one focusing on the station and it's slow descent into destruction as everyone turns on Sinclair; and the second arc focusing on the shadow war with Babylon 4 as its center.

Without Sinclair, the jump was made direct into the Shadow War, and Sheridan had to slowly come to make the decision to break away from Earth while Sinclair was already having Earth's scorn drawn towards him in season one.
 
how bad Michael O'Hare, Bruce Boxleitner, Tracy Scroggins, Claudia Christian, Jeff Conaway, Jerry Doyle and co. were.
Sorry man, I can't take you seriously when you say stuff like this.

Well, to some extent it's in the eye of the beholder - I certainly think some of the above are poor actors and although not all are, some of them certainly came over that way to me in B5.

It's all the more surprising to me as I don't really notice many other shows having 'performance issues' of that nature.
 
Most of the cast was nothing to write home about. There were exceptions - and oddly, they were generally the aliens.

It ends with Sinclair's appearance as Valen in the past. "We have a great deal to do."
 
As I wrote in the other thread, I don't actually believe that the "original arc" as explained in that thread is what would have happened if O'Hare had stayed on the show. So many of the changes have nothing to do with Sinclair. Most of them probably would have happened anyway. It's also unclear when some of these changes to the arc were decided on. Some of the changes were probably already in progress during Season 1, when O'Hare was still there.

The biggest change from the original arc to the one that we actually got is that the original arc ends the series on a cliffhanger, with the conflict with the Shadows unresolved. I speculated that one thing that might have caused JMS to change his mind is his realization of what can be done with CG effects and what can be done on a TV budget.

The way JMS pitched the series initially, he made it sound like the whole story would be told from the POV of the station, whereas in the show as filmed, we have many of our characters going off and doing important things throughout the galaxy in Seasons 3, 4, and 5. We also have a lot of (by early 1990s standards) complex space battles and action scenes. So I wonder if JMS just didn't think that the Shadow War as he envisioned it could be realized on a TV budget in the 1990s. So he figured "OK, we'll make this five year story called Babylon 5. If it's a huge hit, then we'll do the spinoff series, and by then the technology will catch up, and my imagination can run wild." But then once the show got into production, and he realized how he could stretch those dollars and show things with CG that he hadn't anticipated, that freed him up to include much more within the 5 year arc of B5.

That's pure speculation on my part, but it seems plausible to me.
 
I think the larger factor was he realized he was never going to get ten seasons of this niche show and he better condense it into five.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top