Still an anachronism. Flexible e-paper updated via wifi was predictable in the 90s. In the 23rd century though, we might have a brain implant feeding us the news directly but neither that nor Babcom also wired directly to the cortex translate well to TV.
Amazing how hilariously wrong they got the future in the 1990s. Even if newspapers are still a thing, would they really have somebody courier physical papers all the way from Earth to Babylon 5?
I will fully admit that I really like Lochley and that the way Sleeping in Light ignores her completely (when it would've been real easy to film a pickup for SiL mentioning her) is my central issue with the episode and the reason that I don't think it works as a Series Finale, especially on a first-time viewing.
People can disagree with me on that, but it's how I feel.
The pivotal events that justified the whole story mostly happened before her tenure and she was never a main player in the IA or one of the main circle of characters even in the season she was in.
On the B5 Audio Guide, it became a running joke that, despite being listed in the main credits and on the DVD covers, "the telepath" was barely actually on the show. That carried forward to the other telepath and, now, calling out every time Lochley doesn't show up (which is startlingly often).
I recall numerous times seeing orders and private text messages being printed out on plastic transparencies.Still an anachronism. Flexible e-paper updated via wifi was predictable in the 90s. In the 23rd century though, we might have a brain implant feeding us the news directly but neither that nor Babcom also wired directly to the cortex translate well to TV.
I mean, is that any different from if someone in Trek chose to use a replicator to produce a paper copy of the paper even though they could read it on a PADD if they wanted to do so?
That's not the same as e-paper though. E-paper prints itself.I recall numerous times seeing orders and private text messages being printed out on plastic transparencies.
The implication was probably for something that was appropriately, though vaguely, futuristic. E-Ink, flexible display, something (though I remember Sheridan crumpling one up and throwing it away in disgust, so it can't be that expensive. I can't imagine throwing an iPad into a burning fireplace no matter how angry something I read on it made me).That's not the same as e-paper though. E-paper prints itself.
And we have reason to believe that one recycling their newspaper in B5 works differently why?
I'm surprised Sheridan didn't nuke it to make sure.The implication was probably for something that was appropriately, though vaguely, futuristic. E-Ink, flexible display, something (though I remember Sheridan crumpling one up and throwing it away in disgust, so it can't be that expensive. I can't imagine throwing an iPad into a burning fireplace no matter how angry something I read on it made me).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.