1) I don't think consensus here is that it's particularly jarring.
2) All it really tells us about the fate of anything is that the station and characters all eventually end up dead.
Babylon 5 first time watching - specific viewing order?
- Thread starter Riverside2233
- Start date
1) I don't think consensus here is that it's particularly jarring.
2) All it really tells us about the fate of anything is that the station and characters all eventually end up dead.
You should be able to set up a watchlist and then in the departments pull down select Prime Video and you'll get Your Watchlist as one of the options.
I use my TV to watch Amazon, but when I find something I like, like a season of a tv show, it says add to watchlist and then it's on my list and I don't have to search anymore.
And now on a different topic, SiL takes place 20 years later. If you can't adjust to things changing over the course of 20 years, then I suppose that would be jarring. Almost every other show, at least from that time period, you could watch a first episode and a last episode and the characters are very much in the same place and the same people. Anyone who knows Babylon 5 knows that is exactly NOT what happens with these characters. Who is in exactly the same place with no changes after 20 years in real life? And that's what JMS did with his characters, they aged, they changed and not always for the better. So to expect an episode that happens about 20 years later not show changes is illogical.
And now on a different topic, SiL takes place 20 years later. If you can't adjust to things changing over the course of 20 years, then I suppose that would be jarring. Almost every other show, at least from that time period, you could watch a first episode and a last episode and the characters are very much in the same place and the same people. Anyone who knows Babylon 5 knows that is exactly NOT what happens with these characters. Who is in exactly the same place with no changes after 20 years in real life? And that's what JMS did with his characters, they aged, they changed and not always for the better. So to expect an episode that happens about 20 years later not show changes is illogical.
Are you talking like something similar to Prime Video service? I guess online they have it tabbed to where it should show your recently watched. Might take a few clicks.
I'm watching through a smart TV app so it's similar to Netflix interface.
Not sure if that's what you mean.
As for the specific presence of one character and the specific absence of another, one of the things I like about B5 is that it was able to hold on to recurring characters across only a handful of episodes, even years apart. It helped with the scope. People like the Regent, Dr. Hobbs, and Ms. Connally (who only actually appeared in one episode, but was still name-dropped when there was an issue at the docks five years later). And doing that made it feel less odd when they had one-offs who were supposedly always in the background, like the Nightwatch security guard in season three, or the time Franklin had a meeting with, like, a half-dozen other doctors who he was in charge of.
I will fully admit that I really like Lochley and that the way Sleeping in Light ignores her completely (when it would've been real easy to film a pickup for SiL mentioning her) is my central issue with the episode and the reason that I don't think it works as a Series Finale, especially on a first-time viewing.
People can disagree with me on that, but it's how I feel.
People can disagree with me on that, but it's how I feel.
Not to mention but in SITL JMS was concluding a bit of foreshadowing with having Londo dead and Vir as Emperor.
This Homeguard thing hitting more close to home now than it did in the 90s or in the 00s when I first saw it.
Which concluded in the novels right?
I find the best viewing order is to start with "Emissary". 
Unless Londo was killed in the novels, then SITL is the conclusion to what Majel Barret-Roddenberry foreshadowed I’m her appearance.
Is Garibaldi...reading a newspaper in this scene?
Amazing how hilariously wrong they got the future in the 1990s. Even if newspapers are still a thing, would they really have somebody courier physical papers all the way from Earth to Babylon 5?
Even if there is some local Babylon 5 paper printed on the station, would they really go to the cost of transporting huge amounts of paper to the station to print on? I thought this was a show that tried to portray a realistic economy where the cost of interplanetary transport was high.
Amazing how hilariously wrong they got the future in the 1990s. Even if newspapers are still a thing, would they really have somebody courier physical papers all the way from Earth to Babylon 5?
Even if there is some local Babylon 5 paper printed on the station, would they really go to the cost of transporting huge amounts of paper to the station to print on? I thought this was a show that tried to portray a realistic economy where the cost of interplanetary transport was high.
Last edited:
I too liked Lochley and wish she had a bigger role in crusade.
There's a season two episode (Divided Loyalties) where you see exactly how it works. You turn in your old copy at the newspaper machine (I imagine there's some sort of deposit that gets paid forward if you don't just throw it away), and it's recycled and prints a fresh one on-demand, customized to your interests.
Still an anachronism. Flexible e-paper updated via wifi was predictable in the 90s. In the 23rd century though, we might have a brain implant feeding us the news directly but neither that nor Babcom also wired directly to the cortex translate well to TV.
Similar threads
