• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Aviation Geeks unite?! Anybody else care about planes here?

What's your level of interest in aviation?!


  • Total voters
    51
Single-seat VTOL electric quadcopter flies!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The aircraft actually has four pairs of contrarotating rotors, so I guess that makes it an octocopter. With its range of only about 20 miles on a battery charge, it's basically an expensive toy. Still, I suppose if these things ever become popular, the FAA may have to make some new rules concerning their use.


Its just a human sized drone with more range
 
would it be a fixed wing ppl/a (airplane) or rotary wing ppl/h (helicopter) pilot license required or will it be a new class of pilot license
 
I've long called the F-35 the joint strike turkey.

now the US Government Accountability Office has come out with damning reported on the program as it continues to fall behind with block 4 aircraft which are supposed to addressing current emerging threats won't be ready for6 years and will cost more to delivery less.

and the manufacturers are still making a pretty big chunk of change. under the contract they be receive incentive payments to get things moving along.

so as the program slip behinds they've received multiple millions in payments.

and even when they've been fined $5mil per aircraft that has been delivered but not combat capable (will be used for training and avoids Lockheed-Martin having nearly 100 aircraft at it's facilties) that's small percentage of the cost.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I've long called the F-35 the joint strike turkey.

now the US Government Accountability Office has come out with damning reported on the program as it continues to fall behind with block 4 aircraft which are supposed to addressing current emerging threats won't be ready for6 years and will cost more to delivery less.

and the manufacturers are still making a pretty big chunk of change. under the contract they be receive incentive payments to get things moving along.

so as the program slip behinds they've received multiple millions in payments.

and even when they've been fined $5mil per aircraft that has been delivered but not combat capable (will be used for training and avoids Lockheed-Martin having nearly 100 aircraft at it's facilties) that's small percentage of the cost.

Blame the DoD's Sole Supplier rule when it comes to manufacturing Acquisition.

The Government / DoD awards "Sole Supplier" as part of the rule making process instead of including everybody into the manufacturing chain to work on the Winning Design which baffles me.

There's no competition between manufacturers to get things out on time along with seperating parts of the update / design group from manufacturing where necessary.

Defense Contracting is always a large bureaucratic mess, but it doesn't help when Congress likes to stick in all sorts of extra Bureaucracy around it as well.
 
Big defense contracts are few and far between. I read where DoD liked that Boeing was gobbling up other firms to keep them alive between contracts.

MacDoug was a poison pill by accounts.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top