I was reading a recent issue of WIRED magazine and came across this topic. I studied human sexuality in school a long time ago and thought I understood the different gender identities and sexual orientations, at least the basic ones.
According to Wikipedia, asexuality is defined as the lack of sexual interest or sexual attraction. Some experts even go so far as to say it's the lack of a sexual orientation.
If asexuals aren't interested in sex or physically attracted to others, then one could argue that most people could be labeled as asexual--nuns, monks, priests, elderly folks who aren't sexually active, etc.--but that's not the case, since voluntary abstinence or celibacy does not signify an asexual orientation. Furthermore, people with certain psychological or hormonal conditions (an emotional trauma, anxiety, depression chemical imbalance) may lack the libido, but that's mostly a matter of physiology.
To add more complexity to this sexual dynamic, there are even subcategories or subtypes, like demisexuals, aromantic, heteroromantic, homoromantic, gray panromantic, and biromantic, depending on one's type of romantic or emotional attraction to others. This whole concept sounds to me like an oxymoron because, aren't asexuals supposed to be not attracted to either sex?!?
But wait! It is said that asexuals do feel an emotional attraction to others, although sexual attraction or interest may not be present.
Having said that, I think many people would fall under that definition: anyone who has ever had a crush on someone (but not in a sexual way), people who can't or don't get laid in general (namely yours truly), or couples who are no longer physically intimate but still very much in love.
The more I try to understand asexuality, the more befuddled I get. Given those definitions, does this mean I'm asexual? What say you?
According to Wikipedia, asexuality is defined as the lack of sexual interest or sexual attraction. Some experts even go so far as to say it's the lack of a sexual orientation.

If asexuals aren't interested in sex or physically attracted to others, then one could argue that most people could be labeled as asexual--nuns, monks, priests, elderly folks who aren't sexually active, etc.--but that's not the case, since voluntary abstinence or celibacy does not signify an asexual orientation. Furthermore, people with certain psychological or hormonal conditions (an emotional trauma, anxiety, depression chemical imbalance) may lack the libido, but that's mostly a matter of physiology.
To add more complexity to this sexual dynamic, there are even subcategories or subtypes, like demisexuals, aromantic, heteroromantic, homoromantic, gray panromantic, and biromantic, depending on one's type of romantic or emotional attraction to others. This whole concept sounds to me like an oxymoron because, aren't asexuals supposed to be not attracted to either sex?!?


The more I try to understand asexuality, the more befuddled I get. Given those definitions, does this mean I'm asexual? What say you?