• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are writers moving over to Mastodon?

Never heard of Mastodon.

Then again I don't do social media. I do boards and list-servers. And if a board or a list-server starts to turn into even remotely the kind of cesspool that Facebook and Twitter have been since their inceptions, I leave. Often with extreme prejudice (as I did, some years ago, with Cake Central).
 
I've been here forever. I'm not going anywhere.

Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, Mastodon . . . that's a brave new world I've never gotten around to exploring.

Good point. I think, Snow Crash predicted how awful the Metaverse would be, and Wild Palms predicted how awful social media would be.
 
I find Mastodon confusing. I've set up backup social accounts at CounterSocial.com and CoHost.org, both as "davidmack". I haven't been able to post yet at CoHost, and I've not really made use yet of CounterSocial.

I have no interest in using Tumblr, TikTok, Pinterest, Instagram, or whatever else is hip these days.
 
I have enough trouble maintaining the social media presence I have already and my Twitter is there for advertising not social fun.

Even if I'm not a Star Trek author, I am a full-time author and this is affecting financial status for a lot of people.
 
Musk is now charging $7.99 a month to have your Twitter name validated.
If he wants to turn Twitter into a free speech paradise like he claims to, he needs some way of raising money to compensate for the far-left advertisers that are going to leave Twitter when he unbans Donald Trump, Alex Jones, Babylon Bee, etc.
 
People make Mastodon sound more complicated than it is, because they're excited about the ways it avoids Twitter's horrible, fundamental flaws. Having to pick a home server is different than signing up for Twitter, yes, but it's more-or-less the same as picking an email service, once you've got one, it doesn't really matter in terms of connecting with other people. And Mastodon makes it a lot easier to switch from one to another if you want to than it would be to switch from a Gmail to an iCloud address or something, you can just update one place and everything goes to the new account. This article goes over the basics.

And Twitter was pretty complicated in its early days, too (it was designed for you to post to it using text messages!), and still has a lot of weird little rules and practices people stopped thinking about because they've learned them already.

I'm hopeful Mastodon finally getting some inertia, I signed up back in 2018 when Twitter did... something objectionable. Oh, right, it was when they refused to ban or moderate Alex Jones. Anyway, I like it conceptually by spreading things out a bit more into the good old days of the internet where places could be separate rather than everyone in the world all living under Twitter's or Facebook's or Reddit's roof. And even though it's decentralized, it still has a way to verify your identity, which Twitter no longer has, since Musk turned their anti-fake-account feature into a paid-dues membership badge that anyone could get, no matter who they say they are.

EDIT: Anyway, to return to the primary topic, while I was filling out my follows earlier (it's a fun scavenger hunt of "Someone I follow on Twitter says they're on Mastodon, I follow them, then I check who they're following for familiar names and follow them, rinse, repeat"), I stumbled on to a few Trek novelists.

William Leisner

Una McCormack

James Swallow
 
Last edited:
EDIT: Anyway, to return to the primary topic, while I was filling out my follows earlier (it's a fun scavenger hunt of "Someone I follow on Twitter says they're on Mastodon, I follow them, then I check who they're following for familiar names and follow them, rinse, repeat"), I stumbled on to a few Trek novelists.

William Leisner

Una McCormack

James Swallow

Looks like the flight away is happening. Just reading through Una's postings.
 
If he wants to turn Twitter into a free speech paradise like he claims to, he needs some way of raising money to compensate for the far-left advertisers that are going to leave Twitter when he unbans Donald Trump, Alex Jones, Babylon Bee, etc.

That may get me to leave more than anything else. If he's going to legalize hate speech, I don't want to support Twitter anymore.

But I admit, I don't think that Elon Musk will be making any of those sort of changes for the very reason that you listed above: it's not about the users, their safety, or the overall content. It's about the advertisers and their $$$.

"Free speech paradises" are something I have plenty of experience with as well, There's a reason that 4chan and its successors kept running into brick walls. Inevitably, the jerks turn the community into a hellscape for anyone isn't a jerk.
 
If he wants to turn Twitter into a free speech paradise like he claims to, he needs some way of raising money to compensate for the far-left advertisers that are going to leave Twitter when he unbans Donald Trump, Alex Jones, Babylon Bee, etc.
"Free speech paradise" where he bans people left and right for saying anything bad about him or Tesla:guffaw:
 
That may get me to leave more than anything else. If he's going to legalize hate speech, I don't want to support Twitter anymore.
There is no way to define hate speech. What sounds like a valid criticism to one person may seem like hate speech to someone else. Anyone who campaigns against hate speech inevitably defines it as "any opinion that I disagree with". Before Musk, Twitter had a strong left wing bias where criticism of so-called marginalized communities was considered hate speech but criticism of white people was completely allowed. Anyone who rants about nonsense like "white privilege", "white fragility", "white supremacy" or "whiteness" is guilty of hate speech in my opinion.

Either it should all be allowed or none of it should be allowed.
 
There is no way to define hate speech. What sounds like a valid criticism to one person may seem like hate speech to someone else. Anyone who campaigns against hate speech inevitably defines it as "any opinion that I disagree with". Before Musk, Twitter had a strong left wing bias where criticism of so-called marginalized communities was considered hate speech but criticism of white people was completely allowed. Anyone who rants about nonsense like "white privilege", "white fragility", "white supremacy" or "whiteness" is guilty of hate speech in my opinion.

Either it should all be allowed or none of it should be allowed.
Well then, denying the existence of white supremacy is the ultimate example of white fragility. Denying the existence of marginalized groups is the luxury afforded to you by your white privilege and presumably insular upbringing. And the entirety of your post includes many of the worst aspects of whiteness in short form.

Better call the cops on me for all that hate speech.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top