• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are there any good websites or links to debunk rubbish?

No just engineer an optical chip that can be read directly by a laser or other kind of beam like isolinear chips, then we shall have more Trek stuff in real life.
I believe the problem with optical chips is the limitation presented by the wavelength of light: 400 nm (violet) to 750 nm (red). The transistor size on current integrated circuits is typically 7 nm; IBM have manufactured ones as small as 2 nm. Those sorts of dimensions are only accessible to soft X-ray photons with an energy of around 160 eV or higher. Therefore, optical chips that depend on visible frequency light would have a low gate density compared to electronic chips. There was research being done on optical holographic storage. Given a typical laser wavelength of 500 nm or so, the density achieved corresponded to 10^12 bits (1 Terabit) per cubic centimetre - last time I looked into it, anyhow. I'm not sure what the typical read and write access times were. However, I think SSDs can beat that technology in most respects apart perhaps from power requirements. Data centres appear to be moving toward SSDs from HDDs. I can stand to be corrected on my analysis.
 
I believe the problem with optical chips is the limitation presented by the wavelength of light: 400 nm (violet) to 750 nm (red). The transistor size on current integrated circuits is typically 7 nm; IBM have manufactured ones as small as 2 nm. Those sorts of dimensions are only accessible to soft X-ray photons with an energy of around 160 eV or higher. Therefore, optical chips that depend on visible frequency light would have a low gate density compared to electronic chips. There was research being done on optical holographic storage. Given a typical laser wavelength of 500 nm or so, the density achieved corresponded to 10^12 bits (1 Terabit) per cubic centimetre - last time I looked into it, anyhow. I'm not sure what the typical read and write access times were. However, I think SSDs can beat that technology in most respects apart perhaps from power requirements. Data centres appear to be moving toward SSDs from HDDs. I can stand to be corrected on my analysis.
Optical WaveLengths that are usable for Optical Storage have their issues, going X-ray wavelength would be the next step, but getting the cost down for a cheap X-ray laser diode won't be easy.

As for Optical Storage in 3D space like a Isolinear Rod, that can be doable with enough lasers reading/writing on a point in the crystal, but to do that, you need more lasers and DLP would be the faster way to do it with it's array of micro mirrors and bouncing lasers around without having to move the laser head.

But the DLP array would get expensive since you need such a large area for the DLP.

As far as Data Centers, they're moving to tiered storage.

SSD's are for Hot Data, HDD's are for Cold Data, Optical Disc/Tape is for Offline backup.
 
Data centres always used tiered storage. It's just that SSDs were dropped into the mix. I expect holographic storage would be added if it offered commercially viable benefits such as reduced power consumption, long-term stability, or speed of access - perhaps as a replacement for tape storage.

Using ionising radiation (UV, X-ray, gamma) to access data would seem a tad unnecessary. Electrons seem to do a good job of allowing us to probe down to the atomic level - albeit measuring or creating deviations from 2D rather than volumetrically. When at that scale, quantum effects kick in so error correction is especially vital.
 
Using ionising radiation (UV, X-ray, gamma) to access data would seem a tad unnecessary. Electrons seem to do a good job of allowing us to probe down to the atomic level - albeit measuring or creating deviations from 2D rather than volumetrically. When at that scale, quantum effects kick in so error correction is especially vital.
Modern NAND Flash are already stacked & 3D packaged, so it's not like they aren't "3D" already.
 
Modern NAND Flash are already stacked & 3D packaged, so it's not like they aren't "3D" already.
They're really just folded 2D though. I'm thinking of quantum tunnelling and other electron microscopy methods rather than semiconductor gates. That gets you down to the atomic scale. The smallest gates currently are roughly 10 atom widths across but more typically 30 (the unit cell size of silicon is actually 0.543 nm or 543 pm).

A 2D array of atoms with 0.5 nm spacing gives an upper limit of 4 x 10^14 bits per square centimetre or roughly 50 terabytes, not allowing for parity bits, checksums, and formatting. I don't envisage that being applicable to consumer electronics anytime soon but it might be a possibility for tier 5 or higher "cold" storage.

Guide to Tiered Storage
IBM (atoms) - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Now, a few questions about this video:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

As you can see, this battery still seems to work even with pieces cut away.

Then too...

If you had a real battery hidden in your voltmeter, and this was just metal foil---it wouldn't matter how much of the "tail" you cut away.

As long as you have some of that metal foil between the electrodes it is enough to complete the circuit, right?

Cut between the electrodes and the circuit is broken---of course, were it a real battery---cut it there and the lights go out anyway. Unfalsifiable.

What James Randi might have done is yank the voltmeter out of his hand a and pop it open for a look.


Or maybe this is legit. Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Back to this battery. If it was totally legit wouldn't everyone be knocking on his door to buy the technology? and Nova shame on them for promoting this if it isn't legit.
 
Debunking is not often foremost in people’s minds. Pogue has his focus on what he’s cutting and doesn’t even think to look at the voltmeter…light array…whatever.

Scientists are the easiest to fool:
https://whyy.org/articles/what-magicians-can-teach-scientists-about-skepticism/

I seem to remember Randi saying that children were the hardest to fool.

But that too might be a confabulation of my own memory…

New form of entanglement?
https://www.unexplained-mysteries.c...sts-discover-new-type-of-quantum-entanglement
 
Last edited:
Debunking is not often foremost in people’s minds. Pogue has his focus on what he’s cutting and doesn’t even think to look at the voltmeter…light array…whatever.

Scientists are the easiest to fool:
https://whyy.org/articles/what-magicians-can-teach-scientists-about-skepticism/

I seem to remember Randi saying that children were the hardest to fool.

But that too might be a confabulation of my own memory…

Yeah all through that I kept thinking about that voltmeter. Let's take that apart and see if it had a hidden battery giving a false reading.

I like James Randi, and yet not one soul has ever taken on his psychic challenge and claimed their prize, funny that.
 
Yeah all through that I kept thinking about that voltmeter. Let's take that apart and see if it had a hidden battery giving a false reading.

I like James Randi, and yet not one soul has ever taken on his psychic challenge and claimed their prize, funny that.
Well stupid me just noticed that it was just that light array. Looking at the video again, I see no voltmeter now…
 
Now this one I don't know about:
https://phys.org/news/2022-08-robotic-motion-space-defies-standard.html

Ultimately, the principles of how a space's curvature can be harnessed for locomotion may allow spacecraft to navigate the highly curved space around a black hole.

"This research also relates to the 'Impossible Engine' study," said Rocklin. "Its creator claimed that it could move forward without any propellant. That engine was indeed impossible, but because spacetime is very slightly curved, a device could actually move forward without any external forces or emitting a propellant—a novel discovery."


I want this one to be real so bad...
 
I've listened to The Skeptics Guide to the Universe for years -- so long that when I originally found them, I had to use a dialup connection to download their weekly episodes! They usually respond to misinformation and woo making the rounds in the news cycle, as well as share science news.

https://www.theskepticsguide.org/podcasts
 
Every so often…an idea that is “Against The Mainstream” makes good.

To wit, longtime Bad Astronomer/Cosmoquest forum gadfly Pogono got published:

https://forum.cosmoquest.org/forum/...at-finally-matured-wised-up-and-was-published
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0218271823500104

Applause! (and I don’t mean the company that made little trek toys!)

On that front—maybe the steady staters are ready for a come-back
https://forum.cosmoquest.org/forum/...-challenge-to-the-standard-cosmological-model

In terms of determining true from false--things only get harder from now on
https://techxplore.com/news/2023-01-chatgpt-convincing-fake-scientific-abstracts.html

Legit laser?
https://www.tiktok.com/@phamtuantung2023/video/7212026789625974042

If you can't beat them
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/08/business/uri-geller-magic-deep-fakes.html

I can't believe phys.org ran this:
https://phys.org/news/2023-08-spirit-mediums-tourism-secrets.html
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top