Disillusioned
Commander
Is there some point you're trying to make here? Or are you just implying that since I disagree with you that your opinion is somehow more valid than mine?Correct: Opinion. Yours.
That doesn't make sense.No, but there's a difference between being right and doing the right thing.
No, those things were presented as being the right thing to do, which made Archer right to do them according to the logic the writers were presenting.Not right: He stole a warp coil. He tortured a prisoner. And yet, if he didn't, Earth would've been destroyed. Hence, not right, but did the right thing.
There are a couple of things here. First, he wasn't the first Starfleet captain because we not only saw that there were other Starfleet captains but it was implied by the presence of an Admiralty. Second, even if he was the first one to really get out there an explore, that isn't an excuse for being so horribly incompetent.But here's the thing - the entire series was based on the idea that Archer was the very first Starfleet captain,
A lot of the "mistakes" he made wouldn't have been made by even modern military personnel.making "mistakes" that other captains would benefit from,
The thing that always strikes me is how the writers always acted like there already was one.including a Prime Directive.
What?I personally believe that no one would rise to acceptance from the Trek community.

Which doesn't make using the same cliches over and over and over again any better. why should I care at all if it's been used before outside of wanting to see something different for a change?You should take it up with the people who wrote the Epic of Gilgamesh or the Bible or Homer, not Hollywood. Hercules, Moses, Gilgamesh, etc. are heroes way before Hollywood was ever created. That's how deeply rooted these are. People in Hollywood use these "cliches" because they feel natural. I can't think of a single show that doesn't follow this formula.