if anything, we're Goldilocks now for the conflicting requirements from preexisting Trek: "The galaxy is at peace now, Starfleet has kept the peace for a century, violence is a thing of the past" vs. "Klingons are our arch-enemies, unremittingly hostile for half a century already, we have these great veteran warriors, we're armed to the teeth".
A single adversary who elevated the threat level from "hostility" to "slaughter" for a brief moment a decade before TOS and managed to kill a grand total of 10,000 people is just plain sweet. Two such adversaries would make it "a galaxy at constant war" instead.
An additional adversary who doesn't yet kill anybody but intimidatingly has the potential to do so would be doable, I guess.
Timo Saloniemi
A single adversary who elevated the threat level from "hostility" to "slaughter" for a brief moment a decade before TOS and managed to kill a grand total of 10,000 people is just plain sweet. Two such adversaries would make it "a galaxy at constant war" instead.
An additional adversary who doesn't yet kill anybody but intimidatingly has the potential to do so would be doable, I guess.
Timo Saloniemi