• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Anyone else annoyed at the dumbed down writing in ENT?

AnnaY: Not anymore, they don't. [Value experience over a degree]
You're a little bit younger, so I'll prevent you from the shock I had when I graduated from college (and wasn't sure what I wanted to do with a double major in creative writing and history).

As someone who's 37 and helps hire people -- experience is always the winner. Notice how it's in job descriptions - degrees are after thoughts. In some places, you have to even demonstrate you can do the work. For example, we give tests to people interviewing to ensure they can edit and use the graphics packages they say they can. It's why it sucks when you graduate from college -- you lack experience, but have a degree. As a degree-wielding person, you pretty much start at an entry level job and work yourself up (unless you got said experience in a job while you were getting your degree). Experience is always the winner.

Well, the average person does. Employers not so much, since nowadays the world is lawsuit happy and said employee having a degree is most likely a far safer insurance policy than one that doesn't.
Not true. In these lawsuit happy days, employers just need to ensure you've done what you said you've done -- they double check with previous employers and double check to see if you have a degree if you say you have one. If you say you have certifications, they check that, too.

Not that I believe everything requires a degree, though, but that's just the way the wold works these days.
Don't let them fool ya. I encourage you to get one, but when you do, it's about experience. No one has asked me what degree I got since I was 22.

Captain X: I know people who could build a computer with their eyes closed and they aren't even out of high school yet, but unless they catch a break, they still need to make it official by going to an accredited university.
This is very sweet, and I'm not being condescending. I remember thinking this way when I was younger.

As an older person, it's all about catching a break even if you have a degree. It's about who you know and what you can do. I betcha everyone on this board is where they are now because they "caught a break."

I sure did! I wanted to write the great American play as a bartender with my degree. After some tough conversations with the folks who helped pay for said degree, I figured I should probably enter the workforce. My boyfriend at the time had a father who worked for NASA; they needed a junior editor. I caught a break.

So to wrap things up:
* Have experience; having a degree helps, but may not be essential - chances are if you have experience, they'll overlook needing a degree
* Network, so you can meet people who can give you a break
* Be smart
* Be nice - personality really does help

For those young-uns in the crowd who are likely to disagree because I'm Commodore64, I encourage you to chat with others who have jobs and are old. :) I promise what I say is true.

Trip - bringing it all home - had experience and demonstrated it, had networked with a captain who gave him a break, was smart and was nice.


I've got to agree with everything you've written. I'm 41 myself, and I've taught and talked with thousands of businesspeople in all manner of jobs, including tons of HR people. The short answer? Degrees don't guarantee the person knows his ass from a hole in the ground.

Experience. Of course, since my degree was psychology, I can also tell you that people, being the cognitively lazy animals we are, will use the degree as the simplest measure of value and be a bit myopic in that regard. But those who do strive to hire quality employees will understand that the degree is no real measure at all.

Further, universities are very adept at promoting the supposed worth of degrees in various arcane fields, making it seem that unless you've paid the tuition, your opinion in said topic doesn't amount to squat.

What this conversation is lacking, is that the wealthiest people in the world did not get their money by getting hired by the right people. They were entrepreneurs. They made their own companies.

So in my opinion, degrees are necessary to obtain, to open one's mind and expand their thinking skills; but have very little to do with actual job skills. Universities are quite inept at imparting actual job training. We keep signing up for more degrees in the hopes of getting that crumb. Meanwhile the industrious immigrant kid with two years of vocational school is fixing car engines and starting his very own household. And most are taking jobs that aren't even related to their uni study.

Nope, give me experience. And intrinsic interest in the job.
 
if a person wants to move up to a certain level yes experience counts but you better have that little piece of paper before you even consider applying for certain postions.
and positions within engineering is one of them.
and even if gates dropped out of college dosnt mean microft dosnt value that piece of paper because it does.
go and look through a lot of the positions for them and apple and see how many require that degree and often mention masters and above is preferred.


heck i know people who had tons of experience but who had to go back and finish their degrees before they could get certain positions.

shrug..
heck as i noted tatv has so many faults this is pretty minor and there is the chance hoshi was just pulling chefs leg or was ignorant of trips qualifications.
:lol:
 
Last edited:
I don't recall anything saying that they went to Academy at the same time, but they were both working on the Warp 2 project in First Flight. That's when Archer met Trip, and so they would have known each other - and been working together - for 8 years or so before Archer actually picked Trip to be his First Officer/Chief Engineer. By that time, Trip would have been the resident expert on and probably a main developer of the first Warp 5 ship.

As for education (although I typically ignore everything expressed in TATV), isn't it possible that Trip received his engineering training through Starfleet, and so did not go to a private four year college? I mean, the warp 2 engine may have been a specialized area being worked on only by Starfleet, so maybe they provided his education.

First flight contradicted something from season 1--there was a coversation with Trip talking about being on a training mission with Archer and like his leadership or something, can't remember. Archer might have been an instructor at that point though. The first time I saw First Flight, I thought--well there goes Trip/Archer continuity.
 
^ It's funny. I had two engineers in the room when I crafted the response -- the hub (no degree) and a friend of his (who graduated in architecture, but is an engineer). I have a degree, but we all pretty much agreed: who you know and what you know wins out every time.
 
^ It's funny. I had two engineers in the room when I crafted the response -- the hub (no degree) and a friend of his (who graduated in architecture, but is an engineer). I have a degree, but we all pretty much agreed: who you know and what you know wins out every time.

frankly it depdends on what kind of work one does and the field they work in.
certain areas you have to have an engineering degree to call yourself an engineer in that field.
for instance the people i work with the engineers have degrees and the one who only have some engineering or other education are techs.
 
First flight contradicted something from season 1--there was a coversation with Trip talking about being on a training mission with Archer and like his leadership or something, can't remember. Archer might have been an instructor at that point though. The first time I saw First Flight, I thought--well there goes Trip/Archer continuity.
If you're thinking about Strange New World, where Archer was trying to convince Trip not to shoot T'Pol by referring to an incident on a training mission, where Trip got some sort of oxygen narcosis and tried to take off his helmet in no atmosphere - there's no contradiction or continuity violation there. I think they were talking about specific deep space training for this mission, not some earlier Archer as instructor, Trip as student scenario.
 
First flight contradicted something from season 1--there was a coversation with Trip talking about being on a training mission with Archer and like his leadership or something, can't remember. Archer might have been an instructor at that point though. The first time I saw First Flight, I thought--well there goes Trip/Archer continuity.
If you're thinking about Strange New World, where Archer was trying to convince Trip not to shoot T'Pol by referring to an incident on a training mission, where Trip got some sort of oxygen narcosis and tried to take off his helmet in no atmosphere - there's no contradiction or continuity violation there. I think they were talking about specific deep space training for this mission, not some earlier Archer as instructor, Trip as student scenario.

You could be right--that was indeed what I was thinking of. Still, it felt like a continuity error at the time--and I think it WAS one. I'm not all that bugged about continuity--they probably had an idea for First Flight, then said, how can we get Tucker in there, and didn't care about what they said before. It didn't bug me all that much. I just think that Trip did in fact go to the Academy.
 
jon..Remember when your EV pack froze up on Titan during the Omega training mission? You got nitrogen narcosis. You started to try to take off your helmet. You remember what I'm talking about?

i just dont see the problem between this and first flight.
we are already know that jon and trip did training together. for instance the survival training in the australian out back.
and jon even in first flight was the superior officer so yeah he could order trip to
keep his helmet on during the titan training mission.

and as far as we know the academy does not exist yet.
evidently after you go to school you then enter into specialized starfleet training.
trip calls it stc and from hoshi we know st is starfleet training.

frankly in something like starfleet the training never would stop.
there would be refrsher training for survival and all kinds of scenarios.
 
Oh yeah, I didn't ever think of no Star Fleet Academy! Whoops! Oh well, I just don't let things like that bother me--I just enjoy the show. BUT I've refused to watch other shows over small things that bug me, so I can't really chastise those who find that Trip's training makes the whole thing seem fake.
 
I would think the first starship out there would have the 'best and the brightest'. The idea that the chief engineer of this vessel, who doesn't have a degree and who gained his knowledge from tinkering on fishing boats, is beyond silly and ludicrous. (Just another stupid inconsistancy from a ridiculous episode:rolleyes:)
You know, I see where they were going with the whole, "Trip didn't get an engineering degree," thing, but I agree with Hoshi's sis on this one. Okay, Trip is a practical, come-up-with-a-solution-on-the-fly kinda guy. I like that, I can respect it. However, regardless of how it works today (and honestly, it does work both ways, both experience and having the asked-for qualifications are important), I would hope that in the future, on the brand-new, braving-new-worlds, let's-show-off-our-new-technology flagship that the engineer would be the numero uno guy. I never doubted that Trip was, and, like you, HS, found this description of Trip to be ridiculous. Okay, maybe he didn't go to college, but he had to have more than natural intuition. He had to get some kind of qualification. I personally fill in the blanks myself by thinking he had specialized auxilliary training of some sort at which he excelled, but really, at the time I heard this line I was like, gimme a break.

Here's the quote, by the way:

RIKER: Did you ever find yourself attracted to him?
HOSHI: Maybe a little. I never really thought he was my type. Didn't even graduate college, he learned about engineering working on boat engines, I think. Never cared much about languages, could barely speak English. But he did have his moments. I still find him kind of cute. Keep that to yourself.
 
And that remains one of the most absurd things I've ever heard. Just how the hell can you learn the complex physics and engineering you'd need about warp engines or anythign else about a starship working on boat engines? :wtf: Stupid.
 
I learned about psychiatry by working on computers in a psychiatric setting. Someday I hope to get a job as lead phychiatrist on a space ship. :lol:
 
I don't think ENT was down to Earth.

The "contemporary style in the future" gimmick that Berman may have believed he crafted for ENT never happened IMO.

I think Firefly was more down to Earth than ENT. Realistic dialogue and character interactions.

Different strokes for different folks - of ALL the 'modern' Star Trek series, I felt Enterprise came the closest in true spirit and execution to the original Star Trek series itself, and that's why it's my second favorite Star Trek series after TOS.

As for DS9 - its 3rd, 5th and the start of the 5th season were it's best moments. When it became Siso soap-opera Star Trek in Seasons 6 and 7, it lost a lot of appeal for me.
 
HOSHI: Maybe a little. I never really thought he was my type. Didn't even graduate college, he learned about engineering working on boat engines, I think. Never cared much about languages, could barely speak English. But he did have his moments. I still find him kind of cute. Keep that to yourself.
That sounds so "and he didn't even call the next day like he said he would!" Idiotic line and reason number 3004948 why I ignore TATV.
 
I would be annoyed if I thought the writing were "dumbed down."

I didn't.



I enjoyed ENT..

Sorry none of you apparently did.


;)
 
"Dumbed down" is just code for "if you liked the show, you're dumb." Well, I loved the show, and I'm certainly not dumb. Go watch something else if you think Enterprise is dumb.
 
Enterprise was doomed from the start with creatively bankrupt writers/producers and a weak cast. There was a lot of flailing around in the 1st 2 seasons, and then when they did try to get an outline going for season 3 and 4, it was pretty much too little too late. I did like the direction the series took in the last 2 seasons, but it was marred by poor writing and weak acting. The show would start to get the tiniest bit of momentum going and then you'd get bombed with Hatchery or Daedalus and lose all faith again. It's a shame because I thought some of the subject material they finally got around to with regards to a desperate humanity was actually pretty interesting. DS9 touched on similar themes, but under different circumstances. I never felt it was dumbed down writing, but rather it was tired. It seemed like they wanted to explore a new direction, but didn't have the commitment or the fresh ideas to really get it there. Props to Manny Coto though, for trying to bail water out of a sinking ship.
 
I can't agree with you about the acting. I think all of them did pretty well for what they were given. A lot of people like to lay it on Scott Bakula because they didn't like Archer, but that wasn't really his fault, that's how his character was written and he was just trying to work with what he was given. No, I just blame the poor writing, caused by producers who ceased to really care all that much about their own franchise, and by plenty of network and studio interference. That's what doomed them.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top