• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Any under 30 classic film fans?

If i am not doing anything and i see a old film being shown on TV i like to sit down and watch.
Love the original UK gas light and have always wanted to see citizen Kane and i have apocalypse now sitting on my digital hard drive waiting for me to watch.
 
I'm 25, and mostly enjoy movies from the 30s, early 40s, and late 90s. While many of my favorite movies, such as An Ideal Husband, Amistad, and Meet Joe Black, are from the very late 1990s (the only period that exceeds the early 1930s in my esteem), most of balance of the movies I like best were released during the Golden Age of Hollywood. (Indeed, I admire the late 90s and early 2000s in no small part because of the then-popularity of the Classical Hollywood Style which had been abandoned for decades.)

Some of my favorites from the Golden Age include My Man Godfrey, Goodbye, Mr. Chips, Holiday Inn, Thirty Day Princess, Manhattan Melodrama, They Died With Their Boots On, and Here Comes Mr. Jordan.

The period featured some of my favorite actors: Claude Raines, Sylvia Sidney, Cary Grant, Errol Flynn, Myrna Loy . . . I could go on for hours. Many of even the bit players in the best pictures were outstanding actors in their own right. I don't think Hollywood produced many stars of their equal until, again, the late 90s and early 200s, when a similar number of captivating actors were working again: Anthony Hopkins, Ben Kingsley, Ian McKellan, Judi Dench, Morgan Freeman, Lucy Liu, etc.

Another similarity, beyond the use of the "invisible" film-making style, that I've noticed between the very late 1990s and early 1930s is a subtle sense of approximate sexual equality that disappeared as both the 30s and 2000s progressed. Females in both periods generally wore more, were objectified less, and were treated as intelligent and focused on goals neither romantic nor sexual. The first version of The Maltese Falcon showcases this well, in comparison to the later two 1930s/40s versions of the story: Sam Spade's secretary in the first version is sharp-witted, conservatively dressed, and totally uninterested in him - which is not a plot point or even a visibly intended motif. The Bogart version of the picture is much more sexual and sexist. Like the comedic version of the picture (Satan Met A Lady), it features a ditzy secretary, higher hemlines, and female characters who pine for Mr. Spade. Altogether, the early 30s seem as much infused with the equalizing Republican spirit of the Progressive Era and Roaring 20s as the late 1990s are with the open and optimistic spirit of the Clinton period, which I'm quite fond of.

(I also enjoy the appearance of art deco architecture and decor in the early movies, especially in the rooftop dance scene in Follow the Fleet, having come to love it on Poirot in the 80s and 90s, which I didn't at first realize took place in the past.)
 
23, and a classic film fan of sorts (though I wouldn't call 1980s-ish classic, I use the arbitrary cutting off point of, oh, 1969, say - though I'm a fan of plenty more modern films too!).

Ikiru is my favourite film ever.
 
Yes, I'm 22.

I watch stuff from all eras and genres. In the last week I've been rewatching Ben-Hur, Easy Rider, and Battleship Potemkin.

right now my favorite movies are Blue Velvet and the original Dawn of the Dead.
 
It's weird that some of you folks have said eighties and nineties. Sometimes I don't consider these films that old, but other times the weaker values show. Besides, if something is eighty years old, it's a lot more classic than something that's 15 or 20, isn't it?

I like silents,too, and it drives my family crazy!
 
I mentioned the '80s era because if you're 30 and under that era isn't likely to be a time you remember much.

For myself I think of the modern, contemporary era of film coming around the early 1980's. Of course this is a personal, subjective perspective.

On TCM they've also shown movies from the '80s.
 
Most under-thirties that I know grew up on 80's movies... either on TV or videocassette (laserdisc, beta, and CED can of course be substituted depending on how when in the 80's/90's you saw the film, but VHS was the staple of our youth).

I usually consider "classic" films to be 70's or earlier. Just my opinion, of course... I am on the older end of the under-thirties crowd. Someone born in 1990 may disagree with me.
 
Most of my favorite science fiction and horror movies are from the 1960s or earlier, like Forbidden Planet, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Godzilla, Village of the Damned, The Wolf man, The Haunting, The Time Machine, etc. And no, I don't like them because they are cheesy or campy. I find that black and white films have a different feel to them that suits a certain genre, and I'm not a fan of the excessive gore effects that dominate films these days (including the remakes of a number of films listed above).

On the other hand, I do love a good movie-mocking MST3K episode, which tend to work better on classic movies than modern ones for entirely different reasons.
 
I am 32...guess too old for this, huh?

I like all of Rita Hayworth's movies I seen/own.
 
I'm in my 20s. I'm trying to get into 'classic' films. I'm on a quest to see all the classics and cult classics from the 20s to the present. At the moment I think the oldest movie I've seen is "Nosferatu". I've had mixed results. There are certain old movies I watch that just piss me off with how boring I find them and make me want to give up on seeking out older movies (i.e. "The Third Man", "Touch of Evil", "Apocalypse Now", "The Seven Samurai", "8 and a Half", "The Conversation", "A Man for All Seasons", "Ikiru", and "The Searchers").

Then there are others that are so unforgettably beautiful and powerful (i.e. "Citizen Kane", "M", "Metropolis", "A Streetcar Named Desire", "The Adventures of Robin Hood", "The Last Picture Show", "The Apartment" and my favourite oldie - "Bride of Frankenstein") that make me so glad I decided to explore cinema history when I was a teenager and make me feel spoiled by classics and deeply cynical about modern movies. In the end, just like modern movies, I find that even those almost universally recognized as masterpieces of film history are hit and miss. And no matter how far back into movie history I go, I always find that most of the movies of the past I end up treasuring most are from the 80s (even though I grew up in the 90s and 80s movies were technically 'before my time').
 
Most definitely, I am 23 and I love classic movies. Specifically Westerns and am a fanatic of B-Westerns. The Largest bulk of my collection is dominated by stars of the Golden Age (1930-1955 in my opinion)

Roy Rogers (The King of the Cowboys)
Tim McCoy (Rough Riders)
Buck Jones (Rough Riders)
Tom Tyler (Check out "The Adventures of Captain Marvel")
Abbott & Costello (Hold That Ghost)
Bob Hope (The Road To...)

And above all else John Wayne. Of whom I own all of his movies that are available on DVD, roughly 119-122. And it's from one of his movies that I have derived my screen name from.

However disagree with 80's films being labeled classics at this point as I don't think they are quite deserving of that title yet. To soon I think.
 
I love John Wayne! I have most of his movies on VHS, and have slowly upgraded to DVD for him and my fave Montgomery Clift. Up until I got the Gone With the Wind blu-ray set for Christmas, The Searchers was the only blu-ray I owned. I got it on the first day it came out, and because someone in the pricing department isa twit, it was only $15.

Does anyone have a MovieSTop near them? I really love the store and the low used prices, but they have one sliver of a classics section, and it is woefully understocked. The sad part is, if you look through the rest of the store, you see all the classics mixed in with the other genres. Me thinks there are careless non classic little boys who don't recognize a gem when they see it!

ETA: I forgot to mention I just did a review for Yellow Sky. Anyone else seen it? It seems to be pretty obscure, which surprised me.

http://ithinkthereforeireview.blogspot.com/search/label/western
 
So I gotta be the first a@#$le to come in here and say 'no?'

I honestly can't think of a movie pre-1980 that I actually like. I mean, like really like.

I mean, yeah, I can tell that Hitchcock was a genius. And yeah, 'It's a mad, mad, mad, mad, mad World' has its moments. And of course Connery was the best Bond and 'Dr. Strangelove' was brilliant. I get that.

I'm not saying they're bad movies. I'm just saying I would never buy or rent one, pop it in, and sit down and watch it. It just never happens.

I kind of think that's required to claim 'liking' them, huh?

Everything's just...so...different...and...slow. I can't even enjoy 'Cadyshack' at ALL and those are the funniest actors of their era. I mean, if I can't enjoy that what hope does anything else have?

And please don't accuse me of needing Michael Bay style explosions. That is SO not the point. One of my top favorite films is The Impostors which, ironically, tries to feel like a classic film! So go figure. It's something about the edit and story pacing back then...I just can't get into them.
 
^^ Don't feel bad. I've watched Citizen Kane twice all the way through and I still don't get what is supposed to be so amazing about it. And although I know Blade Runner is full of interesting ideas I find it so fucking slow and plodding that it makes 2001: A Space Odyssey feel like a roller coaster.
 
^^ Don't feel bad. I've watched Citizen Kane twice all the way through and I still don't get what is supposed to be so amazing about it. And although I know Blade Runner is full of interesting ideas I find it so fucking slow and plodding that it makes 2001: A Space Odyssey feel like a roller coaster.

I enjoy these movies like I enjoy Shakespeare. I enjoy reading about WHY they're brilliant. I like seeing snippets of them. I know we have a lot to learn from them.

But I can't just sit down and read 'Romeo & Juliet' or watch '2001' and actually enjoy either of them. It's kind of the same thing.
 
^^ I couldn't take 2001 when I was younger. Now from an adult perspective I can watch it, but I've got to be in a particular mood and/or frame of mind.
 
Blade Runner

I find it so fucking slow and plodding that it makes 2001: A Space Odyssey feel like a roller coaster.

Right on. :techman: I wouldn't even say it had interesting ideas. I feel a lot like S.W.C, even though I claim to be a classic film fan. There are a select few I love, but in general, the vast majority of so-called classics I rent end up being a chore to watch. Pacing and different acting styles often have a lot to do with that.

"Bringing Up Baby", for example. I've enjoyed the charisma of Katherine Hebpurn and Cary Grant in other movies, but their 30s screwball comedy banter way of exchanging dialogue exhausted and annoyed the hell out of me very quickly. I often end up feeling glad I watched the classics just so I know what people are talking about when they praise the movies, but can't say I much enjoyed them while watching them. :(
 
^^ Don't feel bad. I've watched Citizen Kane twice all the way through and I still don't get what is supposed to be so amazing about it. And although I know Blade Runner is full of interesting ideas I find it so fucking slow and plodding that it makes 2001: A Space Odyssey feel like a roller coaster.
I don't get all the fuss about citizen Kane and blade runner either.
I like citizen Kane but i would not call it the greatest film of all time and less said about Blade runner the better.
 
I'm under 30 and enjoy films from the 80s. I wouldn't call that the classic era though, as we talked about in the other thread. I think the oldest 'classic' film I like is 'House on Haunted Hill' from 1959.

I'm not a big fan of pre 1970s things in general though. Most 1960s stuff I find quite repelling.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top